|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 189 post(s) |
iceyburnz
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
353
   |
Posted - 2013.03.14 17:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
Question:
Will clones as a new resource feed into eve as a potential revenue stream for Dust 514 corporations.
And is this tied to the various hints dropped by devs over the last year of changes to the eve online clone replacement system? |
iceyburnz
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
353
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 18:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
Another Question:
In future will it be possible to have "Dust Industrial Mongols" acting in a one man corp but defending thier territory by hiring other corporations via contracts and what not?
Edit: or does the present system account for that? |
iceyburnz
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
355
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 18:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
On the wiki article you guys stated you arn't ready to release the concept for eve bonues but invite the players to come up with ideas.
Heres mine:
a) Cargo Hub - Increases the volume of all storage facilities, command centers and starport for Eve PI by 25%
Purpose: Promotes synergy with eve through PI.
b)Surface Research Lab - Acts as 3 additional Lab Slots for PE, ME and Invention. These are avaialbel to corporations eve players available through the science and industry interface. Scientific networking 1 is required to access them (since eve players can drop BPs on planets). If the districts flips during a research job the research is lost.
Purpose: Promotes greater eve/dust player connectivity, motivating eve players to get dusties on board, especiall industry fouces corps for access to extra lab slots.
c) Production Facility - Reduces the time it takes to mainfacture Basic, Advanced & High Tech PI materials on a planet.
Purpose: Renewed intrested in PI? Synergy between eve and dust beyond "nuke it from orbit". |
iceyburnz
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
357
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
The Elephant in the room map question:-
Will this be released with a fully implimented - terrain unique to each planet - dynamic/procedurally generated maps
Or will it be ashland, line harvest, manus peak, skim junction, and the wards with the same old fishbowl terrain and randomly generated structues (what we sort of have now) with the SI as a central feature.
|
iceyburnz
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
357
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:Kain Spero wrote:Is there any way to transfer or give up district ownership outside of combat? When you take over a district can you automatically remove any structures built there? You cannot remove the structures that are on a district, but any action that leaves you with 0 clones at a district will abandon that district. So selling all the clones or moving them all away will abandon it.
Thats functional but seems to lack grace. I hope that gets iterated on.
Oh and can we sell spare clones to the fast food industry.
I want a double draugr burger with corpus crispies and a large quafe.
Edit: sweet burn about yesterdays assumptions :P |
iceyburnz
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
359
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:
:D Glad to see people starting to offer suggestions on this topic. Keep them coming please.
I am not a fan of bonusing research things as the BPO's never have to be put in harms way. Manufacturing though would be a good one as things would have to go to the POS.
Well I suppose you have to reflect the fact that its a facility that does research.
Its a difficult one. Maybe you could send the BPOs/BPC to the ground via the customes office, with a greatly increased research bonus due to the increased risk. Otherwise nobody would use it, since you can literally research in low sec stations in highsec with high scientific networking.
One Idea I had before I realised it was an eve bonus was research stations accruing AURUM at maybe 1 an hour. That would shut the "pay to w(h)inners" up.
Maybe a small cummulative bonus to all research carried out in that system? |
|
|
| |
|