|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2388
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 05:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
lol god forbid a guy gets up high out of shotgun and AR range and its called a glitch lol |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2428
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 11:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:
Why so passive aggressive?
So, are you gonna accept my challenge or not? The only difference between your call out, and mine, is scale. We, Subdreddit, intent to operate at the scale I'm challenging you, we aren't concerned with one battle on one district on one planet in one little corner of New Eden. If you aren't prepared for what I'm proposing, I can understand.
You guys have your strengths, and we have ours. So don't taunt us into a game of tee ball, and then act surprised when we challenge you to come play fast pitch.
Baal Roo wrote: This is what they do. I'm sure if we let them, they will end up throwing another hissy fit and pretending like they've some how gotten a raw deal again...
So look, here's the deal GIANT.
You've called us out, after already losing to us. We are supposedly scrubs with nothing to offer, right (again, disregarding the fact that we've already beaten you on your terms once)?
So, it can be assumed that you can beat us on our terms right? I mean hey, anything we can do, you can do better.
So, here are MY terms since you don't seem interested in taking Outlaw's terms (Outlaw's terms were designed to FAVOR YOU, no us):
NEXT WEEKEND
Starting SATURDAY, March 23 1700 GMT (12:00 NOON EST)
Ending SUNDAY, March 24th 1700 GMT (12:00 NOON EST)
10 overlapping Corp battles per hour, for 24 hours straight.
The Corp that wins the most battles is declared the winner
No ringers, legitimate corp members ONLY.
We'll make it cheap to make sure you guys can afford it without issues, only 100k per battle (24 Million total on the line per corp).
You'll only need 80 guys online and playing at all times for 24 hour, surely any corp seriously intending to make a dent in New Eden can handle that, right?
You've got 24 hours from now to give us a definitive response. (deadline is Thursday March 14th, 20:00 GMT).
@ Challenge. Dont think DUST will turn out exactly like EVE #justsayin |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2439
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 14:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: So look, here's the deal GIANT.
You've called us out, after already losing to us. We are supposedly scrubs with nothing to offer, right (again, disregarding the fact that we've already beaten you on your terms once)?
So, it can be assumed that you can beat us on our terms right? I mean hey, anything we can do, you can do better.
So, here are MY terms since you don't seem interested in taking Outlaw's terms (Outlaw's terms were designed to FAVOR YOU, no us):
NEXT WEEKEND
Starting SATURDAY, March 23 1700 GMT (12:00 NOON EST)
Ending SUNDAY, March 24th 1700 GMT (12:00 NOON EST)
10 overlapping Corp battles per hour, for 24 hours straight.
The Corp that wins the most battles is declared the winner
No ringers, legitimate corp members ONLY.
We'll make it cheap to make sure you guys can afford it without issues, only 100k per battle (24 Million total on the line per corp).
You'll only need 80 guys online and playing at all times for 24 hour, surely any corp seriously intending to make a dent in New Eden can handle that, right?
You've got 24 hours from now to give us a definitive response. (deadline is Thursday March 14th, 20:00 GMT).
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.................................................................
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Rynx Sinfar wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:While i do like the free advertising and have complete faith in G I A N T to win the bet should be something about G I A N T on ur end if i agree to it. Idk im not very creative on these things http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxxgu6DC3I1qzj5ty.png lol like i said i got no problems i see Baal pokin about wanting to fight "on your lvl" sounds interesting but dont think G I A N T alone capable of that ill admit im terribly bored with this current build and this can lead to some content if i can get ppl interested if u get what im leading to
ur challenge is still too ridiculous tho 10 battles every hr for 24hrs straight? lol thats not even how stuff will work tho i do like the general idea tho and a gauntlet run sounds interesting since PCQ is gonna be a battle per 1hr how bout we split that up to 24 battles in 1 day ur alliance chooses 12 times we choose 12
grp to win 13 of 24 battles in that 24hr span wins the war game just brainstorming here real quick havent run this by anyone yet to even know availability but sounds fun right? change start time to 2pm EST to 2am EST (west coast guys + generally lazy weekend ppl + ppl that punish their livers on friday nights might not get up that early)
lemme know what u think and ill run it by my guys and if ppl can do this or down for this we will get our times
PS: can let PRO tag along as well since they allied with u |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2440
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 16:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Outlaw OneZero wrote:CookieStein wrote:I support Mavado's more realistic simulation of district battle mechanics. This just seems like a small time grind that 24 dedicated players could fairly easily accomplish. That's just an 8 hour shift each, 1 battle per hour. I know there are a lot of guys out there that do more than this every weekend. At 5 battles / hour this starts to get interesting that's 40 mercs on every hour for 24 hours at the same OPTEMPO, might be able to knock it down to 24 at 2 battles / hour, with a little down time in between (trying to stick with solid 8 man squads for simplicity) So 72 mercs to cover all 24 hours if you want to stick with 8 hour shifts, 144 if you want 4 hour shifts. (I know the math is a little rough, but I just can't be assed to clean it up right now) So who thinks they can handle 5 battles / hour for 24 hours straight? I'm truly interested.
but thats similar to how PCQ (Planetary Conquest) is gonna work seems u just want a system where u will have ppl on 24/7 to ensure an easy win
u get 24 battles. u can set ur times during the 12hr window however u want, we can set our "reinforcement time" for anytime during that window as well
if we REALLY wanna go all gay we can go full 24hrs and u can set bogus times to ensure u can possibly win 12 of ur fights on ur timers altho we would only need to win 1 cuz im quite confident in my guys winning all our 12 even if we gotta do them back to back to back to back and we would just need to meet 1 of ur times to get our 13th win
But id ideally actually want to get fights and not get blueballed since we are quite bored of this build and this is good practice up to u guys im just trying to make this fun and get some good fights
PS: we could tweak the #s but 24 was an initial number i threw out since i havent spoken to anyone yet about this |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2440
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 17:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:I don't see anything ridiculous about my proposal. If other corps find it ridiculous, it just means they aren't yet on our level, plain and simple. Most of these corps are preparing for battles, we've been preparing for wars. If you other folks think 10 battles an hour is an unrealistic number, I think you're going to be pretty heavily underprepared for the game ahead.
Corps wanna talk trash about 8 guys and imagine they have an army, it's freaking ridiculous.
who is talkin trash? u hurt my feelings assuming such things all i suggested was a revision of ur idea based on what the dev blog presented because im bored.
why do u assume we underprepared? Why do u assume CCP will turn this game into a zerg = autowin game? thats pretty boring tbqh especially for an FPS and pretty sure in EVE as well based on what i constantly read.
U have ur ways of recruitment i have mine. This game wont last forever and i sure as hell wont hav a bunch of numbers on my team just for the hell of it like PRO. We build tight knit grps that enjoy playing with each other and competitive by nature
We wont break our philosophy just cuz some game requires zerging to hold some virtual land. We will find ways to make our way work and have fun doin it. Whether others deem that successful or not i really dont care what matters most is that we get fights and we have fun.
Sov is just a means to get fights.
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2445
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 22:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Outlaw OneZero wrote:You guys do remember that this is supposed to go to 16 vs 16 soon and well beyond that at some point, right?
this is not EVE and this is on console and most console clans wont ever have the numbers u guys deal with in EVE so dont expect CCP to sell the game for EVE players thats bad business
dont expect this game to be 100v100 or some ******** large fights like that CCP already said they want small grps to be able to do something, they already said zerging would be a terrible strat for conquest
CCP does not want this game to be EVE where numbers = win because only a very small grp would be able to do anything and that is not what they want.
i fully expect 24v24 or 32v32 to be max fights u see in a battle anything higher an it just pushes fps console players away from the game which is supposed to be marketed at them not u. U want unlimited numbers/retardedly large numbers in a fight there is a game for that called PS2 or EVE.
look on themittani.com and see the article on how the same zerging is killing that game apparently. FPS audience likes stuff to at least be somewhat skill based and not numbers based. Making it numbers based means its like EVE no matter how bad u are u can win cuz u can just throw more bodies at something, **** like that is terrible for any FPS.
Anyway was trying to just make some interesting battles and thanks for the heads up of the bug for G I A N T Baal, started seeing that today got it once. Usually happened right at the start of the match so to ppl playing these matches have ppl on standby to jump in or u can simply have ur guy press start leave game and rejoin |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2446
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 15:39:00 -
[7] - Quote
ppl use proto heavy? madrugar is tier 1 tank btw
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2446
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 16:58:00 -
[8] - Quote
Outlaw OneZero wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:ppl use proto heavy? madrugar is tier 1 tank btw
Come, come, you must readily admit that a madrugar would not be expected in a militia / tier 1 training match with newbros?
Actually......yes Militia tanks are absolute **** and militia gear in general is ****. did ur newbros like literally just started playing that same day? cuz if then yes thats a valid argument BUTTT when u consider lvl 1 swarms = adv lvl lolscattermind and lvl 3 swarms = proto lvl loldarkside militia tanks will get solo'd
not to mention AV nades can solo militia tanks again i say yes standard lvl gunnlogis and madrugars should be used
u get alot of options for day 1 AV if ur players skilled properly, **** 1st week ur players should invest in some sort of AV. When ur doin practice matches or any match u dont just throw whoever online into a match, balancing ur team to make sure u have AV options and not a full team of ARs only is key but i shouldnt need to tell yall about team composition.
PS: also how are ur tankers suppose to get practice if they dont use a std tank? limit the turret to adv tops |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2455
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 14:57:00 -
[9] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:With Quick Gloves shooting his mouth in BotG E03 can we expect more drama and corp battles?
lolQuickGloves |
|
|
|