| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
James Thraxton
The Exemplars
89
   |
Posted - 2013.03.02 00:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
my weapon idea is this
A lock on only rifle that fires a missle/s.
has long range for anti sniper warfare, ineffective as a close range weapon.
doesn't lock onto vehicles, only infantry.
3 round "clip"
only semi effective vs other classes (through damage output, or slow reload)
have at it
|
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
3081
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 02:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
More damage to sniper "class"? so the damage based on the weapon the enemy is holding (which would be ridiculous), or maybe by "sniper" you actually mean scout dropsuit. If the latter, then sniper rifle can just wear assault dropsuits or heavy suits and keep sniping.
I'm not exactly sure what mechanism would make the weapon bad at close range. Be more specific. |
TheEnd762
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 02:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
-1 no matter how it would be implemented. Learn to move tactically or counter-snipe. |
Chances Ghost
Prototype Technology Corp.
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 02:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Did you just suggest an AIM free sniper rifle as a solution to sniper rifles?
All snipers would just use this to snipe instead????????? |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood
Unclaimed.
436
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 02:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Terrible idea, but saying you have to counter snipe is a weak argument |
Patoman Radiant
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
54
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 03:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
It sounds basically like a sniper rifle with missiles
Long range, bad at close range....... missing anything to have this not be a sniper weapon?
|
Professormohawk
Stasis Military Support
31
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 05:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
hmm. lock on, huh? thats dumb. now a dumb fire weapon. yes thats better. but useless for countersniping. now a DMR, that could work |
Sada Mokmo
DUST University
Ivy League
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 05:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
Comment coming from another victim of the hitbox bug it seems. |
WyrmHero1945
IMPSwarm
Negative-Feedback
25
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 06:16:00 -
[9] - Quote
Anti-Gayar Snipacus Particle Accelerator lol. |
Thumb Green
Starship Troppers
30
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 07:17:00 -
[10] - Quote
Yeah, I don't think that would work. The lock-on feature just kills it; this thing would become the be-all-end-all of noobtubes. |
|
|
Bojo The Mighty
Bojo's School of the Trades
462
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 07:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
LOLWUT!? |
usrevenge2
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
69
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 09:47:00 -
[12] - Quote
lets ignore OP's ridiculous proposal and just take the bare bones of what he said
a rocket meant to kill snipers
How about a secondary weapon, it shoots straight but has unlimited range it can be a rocket, no weapon drop, but is slow and can easily be seen coming, the warhead only arms after a certain flight time.
this would easily counter anyone sitting still, but be very hard to use against a moving target. the only problem comes in at damaging, is there a mechanic to do less damage vs a vehicle opposed to the camping sniper.
Tl;dr- it's possible, a rocket launcher secondary launcher that shoots straight, no bullet drop, unlimited range, any idiot sniper camping down scope could be hit, but anyone actually moving every once in awhile will probably be fine. |
Eris Ernaga
Super Smash Bros
Friends United Seeking Influence and Notoriety
42
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 10:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
good idea bad weapon no offesnse how about taking a dropship to snipers on mountains? |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |