Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Scalesdini
Universal Allies Inc.
71
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 23:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
Just get a contract vs Planetary Response Organization.
It's like pubstomping, except easier. |
ContraBanJoe
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
38
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 23:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Scalesdini wrote:Just get a contract vs Planetary Response Organization.
It's like pubstomping, except easier.
LMFAO,
I'm humbled you would take the time to post about our Corporation. If you do not consider us a threat, why so much attention?
Suck it ! |
Christoph Archeon
Killshot Corp
59
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 00:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
As another corporation CEO that has played PRO I would testify that they are a great team to play against. Not only are they a well balanced team of good players, one of which happens to be a old corp member that was in my corp who goes by Severance Pay. They have been an extreme help to helping me teach my corp how to better organize. they are formidable corp and play good on the battlefield. This is just my opinion but I'm quite impressed with PRO'S performance on the field they aren't on the leader-boards for nothing. |
Scalesdini
Universal Allies Inc.
73
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 00:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
ContraBanJoe wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Just get a contract vs Planetary Response Organization.
It's like pubstomping, except easier. LMFAO, I'm humbled you would take the time to post about our Corporation. If you do not consider us a threat, why so much attention? Suck it !
After I heard about the way you raged about my response to your recruiting spam (I'm told the butthurt whining on mics was the aural equivalent of nonconsensual sex), I figured I'd give you something else to cry about to the "100+" you have in corp at once.
The way I see it, I'm just maximizing the amount of people I can troll with a given effort. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
205
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 00:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Christoph Archeon wrote:As another corporation CEO that has played PRO I would testify that they are a great team to play against. Not only are they a well balanced team of good players, one of which happens to be a old corp member that was in my corp who goes by Severance Pay. They have been an extreme help to helping me teach my corp how to better organize. they are formidable corp and play good on the battlefield. This is just my opinion but I'm quite impressed with PRO'S performance on the field they aren't on the leader-boards for nothing. Thanks for the testimonial, Foekiller Bali. |
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1029
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 00:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Christoph Archeon wrote:As another corporation CEO that has played PRO I would testify that they are a great team to play against. Not only are they a well balanced team of good players, one of which happens to be a old corp member that was in my corp who goes by Severance Pay. They have been an extreme help to helping me teach my corp how to better organize. they are formidable corp and play good on the battlefield. This is just my opinion but I'm quite impressed with PRO'S performance on the field they aren't on the leader-boards for nothing.
They're on the Leaderboards because leaderboards are idiotic at the moment, and reward corps with most members/most time played.
Skill wise, decent at best, they brought their a-team, contraban included, yet we held two points with ease and toyed a bit before pushing in. |
Scalesdini
Universal Allies Inc.
75
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 00:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:Christoph Archeon wrote:As another corporation CEO that has played PRO I would testify that they are a great team to play against. Not only are they a well balanced team of good players, one of which happens to be a old corp member that was in my corp who goes by Severance Pay. They have been an extreme help to helping me teach my corp how to better organize. they are formidable corp and play good on the battlefield. This is just my opinion but I'm quite impressed with PRO'S performance on the field they aren't on the leader-boards for nothing. They're on the Leaderboards because leaderboards are idiotic at the moment, and reward corps with most members/most time played. Skill wise, decent at best
Decent at best is pushing it. I swear I saw one of the guys in PRO try to shoot the MCC with a railgun turret during the second battle. |
Booby Tuesdays
THE DOLLARS
21
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 03:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
You know the best way to describe this thread?
Hate! Hate! Hate! Hate! Hate! |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2300
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 04:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Christoph Archeon wrote:As another corporation CEO that has played PRO I would testify that they are a great team to play against. Not only are they a well balanced team of good players, one of which happens to be a old corp member that was in my corp who goes by Severance Pay. They have been an extreme help to helping me teach my corp how to better organize. they are formidable corp and play good on the battlefield. This is just my opinion but I'm quite impressed with PRO'S performance on the field they aren't on the leader-boards for nothing.
im sorry but anyone with 1000+ members should be on top total kills and tbqh total kills mean absolutely nothing
carry on with this discussion now, just wanted to point out leaderboards dont mean anything corps' performances vs other corps is what u judge on |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
840
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 20:44:00 -
[10] - Quote
It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant |
|
Crimson Moon V
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
200
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 20:51:00 -
[11] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant What is going to happen when PRO starts losing districts to randoms They are going to fall apart. Everyone that played against PRO in mag knows they lose to any and every team if they have equal numbers. PRO is going to lose every district that gets attacked by a full corp. There is a reason PRO is garbage is their slogan. |
Scalesdini
Universal Allies Inc.
87
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 21:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant
It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a grand total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum.
I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 members between Scrubdreddit and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
840
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 22:34:00 -
[13] - Quote
Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a grand total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 members between Scrubdreddit and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge.
We let our newbros fight corp battles. Those little 8v8 circle jerk have absolutely zero bearing on the long term structure of the game. Have fun constantly defending your one or two districts when the game is actually finished... assuming your corp still exist by then. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2305
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 22:55:00 -
[14] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a grand total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 members between Scrubdreddit and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge. We let our newbros fight corp battles. Those little 8v8 circle jerk have absolutely zero bearing on the long term structure of the game. Have fun constantly defending your one or two districts when the game is actually finished... assuming your corp still exist by then.
no one really expects the game to stay 8v8 but CCP has also confirmed it wont be a zerg game as well they dont want the smaller guy to not be able to hold something.
some food for thought for the mass recruiting corps out there. Not necessarily TEST since they got their own little community to recruit from which tbh is nice, this more for the ppl who spam mails or mass recruit in local
nothing wrong with being big but make sure the ppl u got are actually useful, and training wise if the ppl training the "newbies" are bad then what sort of results ppl expect to get?
more food for thought. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
840
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 23:03:00 -
[15] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a grand total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 members between Scrubdreddit and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge. We let our newbros fight corp battles. Those little 8v8 circle jerk have absolutely zero bearing on the long term structure of the game. Have fun constantly defending your one or two districts when the game is actually finished... assuming your corp still exist by then. no one really expects the game to stay 8v8 but CCP has also confirmed it wont be a zerg game as well they dont want the smaller guy to not be able to hold something. some food for thought for the mass recruiting corps out there. Not necessarily TEST since they got their own little community to recruit from which tbh is nice, this more for the ppl who spam mails or mass recruit in local nothing wrong with being big but make sure the ppl u got are actually useful, and training wise if the ppl training the "newbies" are bad then what sort of results ppl expect to get? more food for thought.
No, you are correct, this is why our newbros fight in corp battles. We have YET to fight a corp battle in which we didn't have AT LEAST one guy who had been er BEEN IN the a corp battle before, and generally at least half the guys in a given corp battle could very well be considered "newbies" to the game in general.
You guys do what you do, and you do it well. We will continue to do what we do, and we will just have to wait and see who ended up making the better choices about how their time was spent.
That being said, what YOU guys do and what UA do aren't really the same thing as far as I can tell . the differences are quite clear in skill, execution, metagame, etc. They are an average group of average guys doing average things in an average way.
That being said, I did edit my original post to be a bit less inflammatory, but since you managed to quote it in the short minute and a half time span that it existed, I'll stand by the statement. There will surely be a balance between zerging and being overly effective with a small meta-game ******** force. Subdreddit is aiming to be an effectively balanced force that sits hopefully within that balance. |
Scalesdini
Universal Allies Inc.
88
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 23:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge. We let our newbros fight corp battles. Those little 8v8 circle jerk have absolutely zero bearing on the long term structure of the game. Have fun constantly defending your one or two districts when the game is actually finished... assuming your corp still exist by then. Here's a little free tip: put your worst/newest players with the least SP and lowest gear possible into corp battles instead of trying to stroke your egos by stacking your best talent with the SP and best gear into them. In the long run your baseline performance is going to have a much bigger impact on your ability to be an effective corp than simply having a few squads of elite players and a stable of inexperienced players left to try and do all the heavy lifting. As it stands, you guys are an average sized corp with an average stable of players at the top end, and you're going to end up getting buried in the noise of average corps with average players playing make believe that they're anything other than average. I'm sure your lack of any defining characteristics as a corp will continue to slowly trickle in average talent at a snails pace to match the average talent you already have, but I'm not convinced that being great at nothing is the best strategy for the long term survival of a corp. I be interested to see if you somehow manage to prove me wrong, but I ain't gonna hold my breath.
D'awww, I think I hurted his feewings. That's so precious. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
840
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 23:17:00 -
[17] - Quote
Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge. We let our newbros fight corp battles. Those little 8v8 circle jerk have absolutely zero bearing on the long term structure of the game. Have fun constantly defending your one or two districts when the game is actually finished... assuming your corp still exist by then. Here's a little free tip: put your worst/newest players with the least SP and lowest gear possible into corp battles instead of trying to stroke your egos by stacking your best talent with the SP and best gear into them. In the long run your baseline performance is going to have a much bigger impact on your ability to be an effective corp than simply having a few squads of elite players and a stable of inexperienced players left to try and do all the heavy lifting. As it stands, you guys are an average sized corp with an average stable of players at the top end, and you're going to end up getting buried in the noise of average corps with average players playing make believe that they're anything other than average. I'm sure your lack of any defining characteristics as a corp will continue to slowly trickle in average talent at a snails pace to match the average talent you already have, but I'm not convinced that being great at nothing is the best strategy for the long term survival of a corp. I be interested to see if you somehow manage to prove me wrong, but I ain't gonna hold my breath. D'awww, I think I hurted his feewings. That's so precious.
Irony at it's finest. The truth hurts, but go ahead and hide behind your reflexively defensive quips, I can't really blame you. I mean, it's not like I was expecting you to have anything of substance to say in response.
|
Scalesdini
Universal Allies Inc.
91
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 00:29:00 -
[18] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge. We let our newbros fight corp battles. Those little 8v8 circle jerk have absolutely zero bearing on the long term structure of the game. Have fun constantly defending your one or two districts when the game is actually finished... assuming your corp still exist by then. Here's a little free tip: put your worst/newest players with the least SP and lowest gear possible into corp battles instead of trying to stroke your egos by stacking your best talent with the SP and best gear into them. In the long run your baseline performance is going to have a much bigger impact on your ability to be an effective corp than simply having a few squads of elite players and a stable of inexperienced players left to try and do all the heavy lifting. As it stands, you guys are an average sized corp with an average stable of players at the top end, and you're going to end up getting buried in the noise of average corps with average players playing make believe that they're anything other than average. I'm sure your lack of any defining characteristics as a corp will continue to slowly trickle in average talent at a snails pace to match the average talent you already have, but I'm not convinced that being great at nothing is the best strategy for the long term survival of a corp. I be interested to see if you somehow manage to prove me wrong, but I ain't gonna hold my breath. D'awww, I think I hurted his feewings. That's so precious. Irony at it's finest. The truth hurts, but go ahead and hide behind your reflexively defensive quips, I can't really blame you. I mean, it's not like I was expecting you to have anything of substance to say in response.
You're over there writing essays because I mocked your corp a bit... and I'm the defensive one? I'm pretty sure I pointed out I was trolling in like my second post, your bad for getting trolled anyway.
OP updated. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
843
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 00:43:00 -
[19] - Quote
Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:
D'awww, I think I hurted his feewings. That's so precious.
Irony at it's finest. The truth hurts, but go ahead and hide behind your reflexively defensive quips, I can't really blame you. I mean, it's not like I was expecting you to have anything of substance to say in response.
You're over there writing essays because I mocked your corp a bit... and I'm the defensive one? I'm pretty sure I pointed out I was trolling in like my second post, your bad for getting trolled anyway.
OP updated.[/quote]
If a few sentences strung together is your idea of "an essay" you're even sadder than I thought.
|
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1032
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 03:16:00 -
[20] - Quote
Hey Baal, sorry to break it to you, but numbers alone won't win districts. And by the attitude your corp showed for the tournament ("We have 50+ members online, but none can bother enough to corp battle"), good luck holding districts. Also, don't back up PRO, Contraban talks a lot of **** and forgets this isn't MAG. |
|
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1032
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 03:17:00 -
[21] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a grand total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 members between Scrubdreddit and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge. We let our newbros fight corp battles. Those little 8v8 circle jerk have absolutely zero bearing on the long term structure of the game. Have fun constantly defending your one or two districts when the game is actually finished... assuming your corp still exist by then. no one really expects the game to stay 8v8 but CCP has also confirmed it wont be a zerg game as well they dont want the smaller guy to not be able to hold something. some food for thought for the mass recruiting corps out there. Not necessarily TEST since they got their own little community to recruit from which tbh is nice, this more for the ppl who spam mails or mass recruit in local nothing wrong with being big but make sure the ppl u got are actually useful, and training wise if the ppl training the "newbies" are bad then what sort of results ppl expect to get? more food for thought. No, you are correct, this is why our newbros fight in corp battles. We have YET to fight a corp battle in which we didn't have AT LEAST one guy who has never BEEN IN a corp battle before, and generally at least half the guys in a given corp battle could very well be considered "newbies" to the game in general. You guys do what you do, and you do it well. We will continue to do what we do, and we will just have to wait and see who ended up making the better choices about how their time was spent. There will surely be a balance between zerging and being overly effective with a small meta-game ignorant force. Subdreddit is aiming to hopefully sit within that balance. Furthermore, with our fo us on ways to improve the newbro experience and incorporate new players into the fold to be as effective as possible as quickly as possible, we hope to position ourselves to better weather the inevitable console player churn that will likely see many corps losing important pieces of their team every time a new popular FPS hits the scene. It'll be tough for an average corp to hold their av3rage sized districts when their average players keep moving on to other average games when they get bored being average and underutilized. That being said, what YOU guys do and what UA do aren't really the same thing as far as I can tell . the differences are quite clear in skill, execution, metagame, etc. They are an average group of average guys doing average things in an average way. That being said, I did edit my original post to be a bit less inflammatory, but since you managed to quote it in the short minute and a half time span that it existed, I'll stand by the statement.
If our skill is average, I dread to think what yours qualifies as. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2308
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 04:54:00 -
[22] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:Baal Roo wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a grand total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 members between Scrubdreddit and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge. We let our newbros fight corp battles. Those little 8v8 circle jerk have absolutely zero bearing on the long term structure of the game. Have fun constantly defending your one or two districts when the game is actually finished... assuming your corp still exist by then. no one really expects the game to stay 8v8 but CCP has also confirmed it wont be a zerg game as well they dont want the smaller guy to not be able to hold something. some food for thought for the mass recruiting corps out there. Not necessarily TEST since they got their own little community to recruit from which tbh is nice, this more for the ppl who spam mails or mass recruit in local nothing wrong with being big but make sure the ppl u got are actually useful, and training wise if the ppl training the "newbies" are bad then what sort of results ppl expect to get? more food for thought. No, you are correct, this is why our newbros fight in corp battles. We have YET to fight a corp battle in which we didn't have AT LEAST one guy who has never BEEN IN a corp battle before, and generally at least half the guys in a given corp battle could very well be considered "newbies" to the game in general. You guys do what you do, and you do it well. We will continue to do what we do, and we will just have to wait and see who ended up making the better choices about how their time was spent. There will surely be a balance between zerging and being overly effective with a small meta-game ignorant force. Subdreddit is aiming to hopefully sit within that balance. Furthermore, with our fo us on ways to improve the newbro experience and incorporate new players into the fold to be as effective as possible as quickly as possible, we hope to position ourselves to better weather the inevitable console player churn that will likely see many corps losing important pieces of their team every time a new popular FPS hits the scene. It'll be tough for an average corp to hold their av3rage sized districts when their average players keep moving on to other average games when they get bored being average and underutilized. That being said, what YOU guys do and what UA do aren't really the same thing as far as I can tell . the differences are quite clear in skill, execution, metagame, etc. They are an average group of average guys doing average things in an average way. That being said, I did edit my original post to be a bit less inflammatory, but since you managed to quote it in the short minute and a half time span that it existed, I'll stand by the statement.
Read ur edited post not too far off from what we do tbh, except i let ppl run in the highest tier gear they got available to them that way when mistakes are made they feel it via ISK loss. We arent EVE rich like yall so we gotta learn to value money
we also play ppl based on who we playing against.
Example our match vs yall wasnt nearly our strongest lineup
i played a few peeps that needed the match experience as i always do, hence while it may not seem like it from yall PoV (i watched the vid of it yall got up) we made some sloppy mistakes due to the green guys that played but overall accomplished the goal of them gettin experience and most of all learning from the mistakes
the only times ill really be picky on who i have in my lineup is if im facing off against IMP/IE/PFB and now WTF because i view that as one of the few chances our strongest lineup will get a good test and can improve their game as well
I agree with u these current matches are absolutely meaningless and i dont blame u for using them as a training ground cuz its the same thing us and other top corps doin as well. |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1118
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 05:52:00 -
[23] - Quote
PRO are scrubs. zerging army of scrubs |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
843
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 08:11:00 -
[24] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:Hey Baal, sorry to break it to you, but numbers alone won't win districts. And by the attitude your corp showed for the tournament ("We have 50+ members online, but none can bother enough to corp battle"), good luck holding districts. Also, don't back up PRO, Contraban talks a lot of **** and forgets this isn't MAG.
meh |
Geth Massredux
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
72
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 20:06:00 -
[25] - Quote
Christoph Archeon wrote:As another corporation CEO that has played PRO I would testify that they are a great team to play against. Not only are they a well balanced team of good players, one of which happens to be a old corp member that was in my corp who goes by Severance Pay. They have been an extreme help to helping me teach my corp how to better organize. they are formidable corp and play good on the battlefield. This is just my opinion but I'm quite impressed with PRO'S performance on the field they aren't on the leader-boards for nothing. You do realize they spam everybody's mail box in game and recruit every new berry in the game. So think of the opposite of impressed. LOL Only reason they are in first is because they have new recruits from over the world from every time zone, so all day, all night killing. Dafuq |
ContraBanJoe
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
40
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 17:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:Hey Baal, sorry to break it to you, but numbers alone won't win districts. And by the attitude your corp showed for the tournament ("We have 50+ members online, but none can bother enough to corp battle"), good luck holding districts. Also, don't back up PRO, Contraban talks a lot of **** and forgets this isn't MAG.
I do not forget this isn't MAG, it would seem some OTHER people can't get past it though.
You'll notice I don't spend a lot of time on these boards, its in part to 2 reasons. First off, this place is full of jerks. Secondly, I'm busy doing what a CEO should be doing, focusing on our CORP, not on those of others.
I may come back to check for some ignorant epeen reply, but don't expect so for a while. Dev posts are worth reading, but ignorant OP posts are not.
GOAT! |
ContraBanJoe
Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore
41
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 01:56:00 -
[27] - Quote
Scalesdini wrote:Just get a contract vs Planetary Response Organization Subdreddit.
It's like pubstomping, except easier.
I just came back to let you know, your troll got hit by a bus.
GOAT! |
Talos Alomar
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
423
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 02:13:00 -
[28] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:
If a few sentences strung together is your idea of "an essay" you're even sadder than I thought.
But literacy is haaaard.... |
Repe Susi
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
264
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 08:26:00 -
[29] - Quote
Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a grand total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 members between Scrubdreddit and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge.
Hey somebody's recognizing us, yay! Subdreddit FTW!
And eh, wouldn't say you guys do very hot either.
And yes, I totally dug that up just because of this thread. |
Scalesdini
Universal Allies Inc.
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 08:30:00 -
[30] - Quote
Repe Susi wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a grand total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 members between Scrubdreddit and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge. Hey somebody's recognizing us, yay! Subdreddit FTW! And eh, wouldn't say you guys do very hot either.And yes, I totally dug that up just because of this thread. I know I'm sad like that.
Difference being that our matches vs OSG were actually close, not just a flat out roflstomping.
But hey, you get a gold star for effort at trying to be talented vicariously through a better corp. |
|
Repe Susi
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
264
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 08:43:00 -
[31] - Quote
Scalesdini wrote:Repe Susi wrote:Scalesdini wrote:Baal Roo wrote:It's always cute when a coyote nibbles the heel of an elephant It's always cute when bad corps take up for each other. I vaguely remember Scrubdreddit getting a combined 36 kills and 109 deaths vs UA, with a grand total of one Scrubdreddit player going positive... at 10-8. Perhaps your focus should be on recruiting non-bads instead of making poor analogies on the forum. I find it hilarious that in the roughly 2,000 members between Scrubdreddit and Planewbtary Response Organization, they can't find 8 guys capable of giving even the most average UA player a challenge. Hey somebody's recognizing us, yay! Subdreddit FTW! And eh, wouldn't say you guys do very hot either.And yes, I totally dug that up just because of this thread. I know I'm sad like that. Difference being that our matches vs OSG were actually close, not just a flat out roflstomping. But hey, you get a gold star for effort at trying to be talented vicariously through a better corp.
Speaking of which, is there a video of that battle anywhere? I would like very much to see it as I wasn't there. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |