Not a bad idea free beers but beta i guess is here to make new emerging corp and solidify foundation of other. Yes you have right corp battle system is terrible right now so why dont give 2xSP and 2x isk 3xsalvage more than pub in the next build, other corp will be more interested and the challenge and the diversification for corp will be better, you have absolutly right with the district system but i maintain my opinion, its too close , i want ccp talk about district come soon in the next build so that fix every dust player what is the kind of game ccp want to bring

Not a bad idea free beers but beta i guess is here to make new emerging corp and solidify foundation of other. Yes you have right corp battle system is terrible right now so why dont give 2xSP and 2x isk 3xsalvage more than pub in the next build, other corp will be more interested and the challenge and the diversification for corp will be better, you have absolutly right with the district system but i maintain my opinion, its too close , i want ccp talk about district come soon in the next build so that fix every dust player what is the kind of game ccp want to bring

This.

If someone wants to take out America (without nukes) they would pick a landing zone or two on the same coast and hit them at the same time. They may take LAX and maybe PHX. They would gain the benifits fo the ports / harbors in LAX and well theres nothing to gain for PHX but you need to take it to move westward. You obviously cant drop right in on Dallas or Chicago and except to take the country from us silly well-armed Americans.

There should be key districts that could be wealth / resource centers that net the holding faction some sort of bonus. The bonus could be actual bonus or a determinant bonus. Using the example above if someone takes out DC well the military might be in a bit of a disarray for a bit which may make it easier to take some of the other coast line cities.

Bigger / more valuable planets would have more districts. You cant say every planet would have 14 districts, because that would assume every planet is the same and well nothing is the same in eve or in life. I think figuring out what benefits and district sizes is the start to really implementing them properly. After that progression is easy.

my .02 isk

To Mr. dunedain:

Dont need to have 500 lol, but i dont want 500 imp waiting near my district when i finally make one, the game is not only for big corp is for everyone if you cant defend the district you just conquer ok fine... But you lose it immediatly its comon sense for me , you can be attack by anywhere its planet not country for each district you need to put a team like 16 or 24

I understand your point of view but you cant hold a solar system with 24 clone lol, if you want this envergure like zion and seraphim its easy... Only 1 corp and not 3

Its a difficult system to balance because if you go too far one way you will see small corps with most if not all of their members getting into fights regularly while the larger corps will have large groups of people who only get in 1 or 2 battles while everyone else lazes about doing nothing. But if you go to the other extreme larger corps will just zerg the smaller ones meaning that we will end up with a system where the largest corp wins through numbers.

Like you said adapt or die.... Find more recruit , yes that bring your elitism a bit lower but if you want more you need to have more clone, and you dont need to be more than your opponent because your corp is the best, so whats your point hold anything in 3 month? Why playing then?

Like you said adapt or die.... Find more recruit , yes that bring your elitism a bit lower but if you want more you need to have more clone, and you dont need to be more than your opponent because your corp is the best, so whats your point hold anything in 3 month? Why playing then?

The really nice thing about our design is that (hopefully) it will let small corps hold a small part of space and big corps can own a big part and better corps will own more for their size.

This is in contrast to EVE which allows massive force projection, so the bigger alliances just own everything. Smaller entities do exist but only because they are allowed to, not because they legitimately took it and defend their territory against overwhelming numbers.

It's exciting stuff, more details are on the way.

firstly, Corp B would have to place something at the hostile district which slowly takes it over. For example a CRU or other expensive looking stuff. They can decide to leave it undefended and do something else. Corp A can wake up, see the notification about the attack and decide the blow the district siege equipment away. Thats when the match starts. If A waits to long the district is lost. A decides when the counter attack starts, B joins and fights or loses.

its like eves FW mechanics, but you don't have to wait at the plex beacon till the timer reaches 0. You place something there and come back if somebody notices it.

I like the idea of time zone

The thing is, that's how it's supposed to work. Have you ever seen any EvE gameplay? Things can be attacked at any time, whether you're at work, on the toilet or in the land of make believe. It has to be constant warfare, and setting up time zones is way inconsistent with the way things are done in New Eden, that would mean that the PvP was still consensual and...Well...Let's face it, that's a CoD thing. Not a New Eden thing.