DUST Search - "Killswitch" breaks "no pay to win" philosophy

usrevenge2 wrote:

Free Beers wrote:

aurum is how we pay for the game if players see no value in items then there is a problem. I personally want to buy aurum items but they have no value to me because they aren't good enough above isk.

CCP really needs proto level aurum items back in the game. None of the other **** appeals to me. I am all about paying to win. I mean look at my magnificant 5kdr (KDR ABOVE ALL ELSE) was all earned without aurum items. I'm a bad fps player so everyone who has a lower kdr should feel bad about themselves. Then they should hope ccp gives they awesome pay to win items to give them a chance.

this is a micro transaction business model so items you buy with aurum will be better than isk. Best to STFU now

um, new here? welcome to the beta, players have spoken from the closed beta, CCP also promised there will be no pay to win. aurum gear will simply be easier to get into fitting and skillpoint wise, not better. now I don't know if what the OP is saying is true or not, but if the weapon for aur really is much better than the isk weapon there is a problem


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Free Beers Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 1040	Posted - 2013.02.22 22:50:00 - [1] - Quote aurum is how we pay for the game if players see no value in items then there is a problem. I personally want to buy aurum items but they have no value to me because they aren't good enough above isk. CCP really needs proto level aurum items back in the game. None of the other **** appeals to me. I am all about paying to win. I mean look at my magnificant 5kdr (KDR ABOVE ALL ELSE) was all earned without aurum items. I'm a bad fps player so everyone who has a lower kdr should feel bad about themselves. Then they should hope ccp gives they awesome pay to win items to give them a chance. this is a micro transaction business model so items you buy with aurum will be better than isk. Best to STFU now
Free Beers Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 1040	Posted - 2013.02.22 23:43:00 - [2] - Quote usrevenge2 wrote: Free Beers wrote: aurum is how we pay for the game if players see no value in items then there is a problem. I personally want to buy aurum items but they have no value to me because they aren't good enough above isk. CCP really needs proto level aurum items back in the game. None of the other **** appeals to me. I am all about paying to win. I mean look at my magnificant 5kdr (KDR ABOVE ALL ELSE) was all earned without aurum items. I'm a bad fps player so everyone who has a lower kdr should feel bad about themselves. Then they should hope ccp gives they awesome pay to win items to give them a chance. this is a micro transaction business model so items you buy with aurum will be better than isk. Best to STFU now um, new here? welcome to the beta, players have spoken from the closed beta, CCP also promised there will be no pay to win. aurum gear will simply be easier to get into fitting and skillpoint wise, not better. now I don't know if what the OP is saying is true or not, but if the weapon for aur really is much better than the isk weapon there is a problem I've been around for a year how about yourself? If ccp offers an aurum item with better stats its an advantage and pay to win. I know last summer we tested all the aurum items and the proto ones with lower cpu/pg where the best and only ones of real value. the fits we were just better. Did is make me live longer or kill better? No idea. Pay to win is here. CCP can't milk people for aurum on boosters and call it a day. AFter a certain point players have enough sp and have no interest at to spend aurum for extra sp. Hell I am at proto level guns and almost to suits now. Then on to equipment so what aurum items would I desire then? Not a level 4 suit that can be used at level 2.
Free Beers Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 1040	Posted - 2013.02.22 23:45:00 - [3] - Quote King Kobrah wrote: The AUR complex shield extenders that perform just as well as proto and have less CPU/PG requirements is "pay to win" no matter how small the advantage. It should be "pay to advance faster" not "pay for items better than ISK variants" They will be back in some form. This game has to be paid for some how and aurum items need to be worth it. I plan to pay to win just to shove it in all the QQers faces.
Free Beers Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 1040	Posted - 2013.02.23 00:00:00 - [4] - Quote Baal Roo wrote: Telcontar Dunedain wrote: There are serious issues with the AUR in regards to cost and the boosters, none of which were raised by the OP. This thread is scrubby and ignorant, you should all feel bad for posting in it. the irony is strong with this one Telc is a scrub but he is dead on.
Free Beers Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 1040	Posted - 2013.02.23 00:08:00 - [5] - Quote Baal Roo wrote: Free Beers wrote: Baal Roo wrote: Telcontar Dunedain wrote: There are serious issues with the AUR in regards to cost and the boosters, none of which were raised by the OP. This thread is scrubby and ignorant, you should all feel bad for posting in it. the irony is strong with this one Telc is a scrub but he is dead on. So you agree that he should feel bad for posting? He should always feel bad for posting, but that doesn't change the fact he is right. Even CCP nothin admitted there are issue with booster prices. Sadly it seem ccp wants to get as much money now before the game fails