|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
2242
   |
Posted - 2013.02.19 02:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
Now we are talking this a great idea! Have each corp pick a standing time each week to defend any one who takes the contract.
It would be low enough anyone can take it. But the rewards you suggested are the reason you would want to take the contract.
Edit. Might make sense to add 10% or a numeric isk/sp value for each week a contract is held by one corp incraesing the desire of other corps to come take over that bounty.
Have all of the contracts at 4 different prime times for the major time zones. So not one corp can hold them all without significant troops.
For example U.S 7.pm eastern all 10-20- corp battles are fought at the same time. So no one corp can easily hold all the contracts. Same for the four other major time zones.
This will give reason for larger corps and can introduce a meta game. Deciding who you will fight each week and deciding which players you will leave behind to defend the contracts you have won. |
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
2242
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 04:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Morathi III wrote:Tbh i disagree for now, perhaps in future, exemple we RAQC are in the district of imperfect ok, really do you think we have a chance to hold a win? The answer is no. Corp are unbalanced right now some corps need more time to improve and adjust, we are still in beta perhaps after the beta this idea can come back, in fact you have great idea but.... Like i always said imps are too powerfull and you have impswarm and internal error on your side dont answer is not true anybody know that, your idea is good but need to be clarified because this idea can kill the game also
The balance comes in the fact there battles would be played at the same time. The last I checked the imperfects only have 60 or so mercs, so we can only held so many battles.
Since when is dust balanced anyway lol. |
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
2242
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 04:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Morathi III wrote:Good point for balance lol, other exemple,we put a 1 million isk contract tonight, the PFBHZ take it, we know its suppose to be a lost we played because we have taken it at first, the result is simple we are crushed we have seen there tactik and probably try to fix when times come. Not sure our corp member want to play against them or imperfect one time a week exemple, some are casual player and the first thing is to make fun. Obligation to play some contract dont appear to be good because a lot are in development and for now the goal is to maximase fan base. We always play in pub match even if the other team is good np, but the goal is to make fun never forget.
I understand your delima , but they aren't battles you have to play. So let the corps that do want to enjoy or "make fun."
Also you would be able to take attacking contracts on the corps you felt more capable of winning against. You may not keep them the following week but so it goes.
|
|
|
| |
|