DUST Search - Bias against certain weapons

All Channels

General Discussions

Bias against certain weapons

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Pays 2 Win Shining Flame Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2013.02.18 19:42:00 - [1] - Quote I have proof that CCP is biased against certain weapons and here is the proof;- Officer Weapons: AR - 2 - Balacs and Krins Sniper - 1 - Thales HMG - 1 - Gastun Min 7 Forge - 1 - Gatun Forge Pistol - 1 - Wolfmans PCP SMg - 1 - Calas There are no offizer weapons for ;- MD Lasers SL Grenades Turrets There also no Offizer vehicles;- Tanks Dropships LAVs Why CCP? Why?
Lurchasaurus SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 808	Posted - 2013.02.18 19:44:00 - [2] - Quote Gimme my officer turrets!!!!!1111!!!1!!!
The Dragon Ascendant Celtic Anarchy 101	Posted - 2013.02.18 19:50:00 - [3] - Quote I cant wait for officer lasers. I am going to burn so many faces off it won't even be funny.

ChribbaX Otherworld Enterprises Dust Control Otherworld Empire Productions 136	Posted - 2013.02.18 19:57:00 - [4] - Quote Because you use Z in the spelling.

Aeon Amadi Maverick Conflict Solutions 1003	Posted - 2013.02.18 19:58:00 - [5] - Quote Pays 2 Win wrote: I have proof that CCP is biased against certain weapons and here is the proof;- Officer Weapons: AR - 2 - Balacs and Krins Sniper - 1 - Thales HMG - 1 - Gastun Min 7 Forge - 1 - Gatun Forge Pistol - 1 - Wolfmans PCP SMg - 1 - Calas There are no offizer weapons for ;- MD Lasers SL Grenades Turrets There also no Offizer vehicles;- Tanks Dropships LAVs Why CCP? Why? Open Beta Style.
Coleman Gray Coalition Of Goverments 47	Posted - 2013.02.18 19:58:00 - [6] - Quote Pays 2 Win wrote: I have proof that CCP is biased against certain weapons and here is the proof;- Officer Weapons: AR - 2 - Balacs and Krins Sniper - 1 - Thales HMG - 1 - Gastun Min 7 Forge - 1 - Gatun Forge Pistol - 1 - Wolfmans PCP SMg - 1 - Calas There are no offizer weapons for ;- MD Lasers SL Grenades Turrets There also no Offizer vehicles;- Tanks Dropships LAVs Why CCP? Why? Biased? AR's are the most commonly used weapon so there would be more of those than any other weapon. asers are sick enough as is, as is the mass driver, Officer turrets would be to sick especially i the vehicle was officer grade too...
Pays 2 Win Shining Flame Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2013.02.18 19:58:00 - [7] - Quote ChribbaX wrote: Because you use Z in the spelling. Oh the tears . Why did I ever use a Z in offizer? Is that the only reason why we arent gettting them? Oh the shame
Y0UR NAME HERE Imperfects Negative-Feedback 440	Posted - 2013.02.18 19:59:00 - [8] - Quote I want officer Amarr tank with full officer modules and turret.
Pays 2 Win Shining Flame Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:00:00 - [9] - Quote Coleman Gray wrote: Biased? AR's are the most commonly used weapon so there would be more of those than any other weapon. asers are sick enough as is, as is the mass driver, Officer turrets would be to sick especially i the vehicle was officer grade too... And here we have a smart ass adding logic to an absolutely illogical thread . Well Hello there CCP Coleman Gray. A top of the morning to ya laddie? Didya just roll outta the bed this mornin?
Pays 2 Win Shining Flame Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:02:00 - [10] - Quote Aeon Amadi wrote: Open Beta Style. This is where you pull a Jenza and put up altered lyrics of Gangnam Style!
Pays 2 Win Shining Flame Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:02:00 - [11] - Quote Y0UR NAME HERE wrote: I want officer Amarr tank with full officer modules and turret. Yes! ***** shapped tanks that fires white lasers! Bukake!
BaD FuRrYV2 Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 11	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:05:00 - [12] - Quote Pays 2 Win wrote: Y0UR NAME HERE wrote: I want officer Amarr tank with full officer modules and turret. Yes! ***** shapped tanks that fires white lasers! Bukake! Tanks with lazzers thinks.......LOL ROFL THE POOR FOOLS !!!!!!!!! Ahh boy im going to have a filed day with my railgun !
BaD FuRrYV2 Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 11	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:07:00 - [13] - Quote Pays 2 Win wrote: I have proof that CCP is biased against certain weapons and here is the proof;- Officer Weapons: AR - 2 - Balacs and Krins Sniper - 1 - Thales HMG - 1 - Gastun Min 7 Forge - 1 - Gatun Forge Pistol - 1 - Wolfmans PCP SMg - 1 - Calas There are no offizer weapons for ;- MD Lasers SL Grenades Turrets There also no Offizer vehicles;- Tanks Dropships LAVs Why CCP? Why? DID you want BAD FURRY IN A OP TANK OR IN A SICA .......... take your time with this one !
Twitch Nixon That's Unfortunate 1	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:07:00 - [14] - Quote Froll tace all day bro.
Y0UR NAME HERE Imperfects Negative-Feedback 440	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:10:00 - [15] - Quote BaD FuRrYV2 wrote: Pays 2 Win wrote: Y0UR NAME HERE wrote: I want officer Amarr tank with full officer modules and turret. Yes! ***** shapped tanks that fires white lasers! Bukake! Tanks with lazzers thinks.......LOL ROFL THE POOR FOOLS !!!!!!!!! Ahh boy im going to have a filed day with my railgun ! Not with tachyon lasers against your gunnlogi. You have 0 resists, tachyon will have like same range, and Amarr tank at least 50% resists without hardners against thermal. When they come into game, shield tankers will QQ and become my slaves.
Pays 2 Win Shining Flame Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:13:00 - [16] - Quote BaD FuRrYV2 wrote: DID you want BAD FURRY IN A OP TANK OR IN A SICA .......... take your time with this one ! LMFAO. Bad Furry in a tank is having a heavy run around with a stick. Big Talk Big **** No Action!
Fivetimes Infinity Immobile Infantry 1086	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:17:00 - [17] - Quote BaD FuRrYV2 wrote: DID you want BAD FURRY IN A OP TANK OR IN A SICA .......... take your time with this one ! Which one would contain less horse semen after you're done using it?
Pays 2 Win Shining Flame Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:17:00 - [18] - Quote Twitch Nixon wrote: Froll tace all day bro. You are new here and prolly dont know me enough. And the answer to your statement is;- YES
Centurion mkII SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 10	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:17:00 - [19] - Quote I think its easier to lose an officer infantry weapon. I think its much harder to lose a officer tank/turret and so am not sure if they will ever exist. Well assuming you only got one turret/tank at a time it might be okay.
Bhor Derri Legion of Eden 95	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:19:00 - [20] - Quote Lazors? I will swap my blasters out from time to time on my gallente HAV those caldari HAVs really pissed me off when missiles were op.
Pays 2 Win Shining Flame Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:21:00 - [21] - Quote Centurion mkII wrote: I think its easier to lose an officer infantry weapon. I think its much harder to lose a officer tank/turret and so am not sure if they will ever exist. Well assuming you only got one turret/tank at a time it might be okay. It all depends on who you are going up against. If it is a corp that has its AV game up, your tank would be out in no time taking out the effectiveness of your turrets.
Y0UR NAME HERE Imperfects Negative-Feedback 440	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:27:00 - [22] - Quote Pays 2 Win wrote: Centurion mkII wrote: I think its easier to lose an officer infantry weapon. I think its much harder to lose a officer tank/turret and so am not sure if they will ever exist. Well assuming you only got one turret/tank at a time it might be okay. It all depends on who you are going up against. If it is a corp that has its AV game up, your tank would be out in no time taking out the effectiveness of your turrets. When the battles become 64vs64 + then I see no reason for officer tanks not to be OP.
Pays 2 Win Shining Flame Amarr Empire 102	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:31:00 - [23] - Quote Y0UR NAME HERE wrote: Pays 2 Win wrote: Centurion mkII wrote: I think its easier to lose an officer infantry weapon. I think its much harder to lose a officer tank/turret and so am not sure if they will ever exist. Well assuming you only got one turret/tank at a time it might be okay. It all depends on who you are going up against. If it is a corp that has its AV game up, your tank would be out in no time taking out the effectiveness of your turrets. When the battles become 64vs64 + then I see no reason for officer tanks not to be OP. Hmmmm. Thats a whole new avenue. Cant wait to see how things will be then.
Y0UR NAME HERE Imperfects Negative-Feedback 440	Posted - 2013.02.18 20:36:00 - [24] - Quote Pays 2 Win wrote: Y0UR NAME HERE wrote: Pays 2 Win wrote: Centurion mkII wrote: I think its easier to lose an officer infantry weapon. I think its much harder to lose a officer tank/turret and so am not sure if they will ever exist. Well assuming you only got one turret/tank at a time it might be okay. It all depends on who you are going up against. If it is a corp that has its AV game up, your tank would be out in no time taking out the effectiveness of your turrets. When the battles become 64vs64 + then I see no reason for officer tanks not to be OP. Hmmmm. Thats a whole new avenue. Cant wait to see how things will be then. Tanks will need to be rebuffed to their original state. Probably why they were the way they were 1st build. QQ really thought ahead on that one
Aeon Amadi Maverick Conflict Solutions 1003	Posted - 2013.02.19 04:52:00 - [25] - Quote Pays 2 Win wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Open Beta Style. This is where you pull a Jenza and put up altered lyrics of Gangnam Style! I find Jenza's style attractive, so I refuse to infringe on that awesomeness. Note: I'm paraphrasing, being as if I said what I really wanted to I'd probably get a forum ban
Full Metal Kitten Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 150	Posted - 2013.02.19 05:25:00 - [26] - Quote Officer AV grenades for your officer tank. Anywayz (see what I did there?), it's beta. All in Soon TM.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.