that has got to a record of the most mentions of 'NOOB' in a single post.

And its sad thats all i can say on this,as i havent got a clue as to what you're trying to say.
What's your POINT?

Cuz all i can see in this is a bunch of crying

It's the RPG elements thrown into the game that CCP has been misusing. Unlike a normal competitive shooter, your performance isn't based off of real skill but rather by the equipment you use and the amount of skill points you've accumulated. This is a problem. After all, CCP has claimed that Dust will be a competitive FPS suited for the e-sports scene, but how could you have a competitive first-person shooter when player performance isn't based off of individual player skill but rather by the value of the equipment you've equipped and the amount of gimmicks and bonuses you've received over time?

...player performance isn't based off of individual player skill but rather by the value of the equipment you've equipped and the amount of gimmicks and bonuses you've received over time?

It's the RPG elements thrown into the game that CCP has been misusing. Unlike a normal competitive shooter, your performance isn't based off of real skill but rather by the equipment you use and the amount of skill points you've accumulated. This is a problem. After all, CCP has claimed that Dust will be a competitive FPS suited for the e-sports scene, but how could you have a competitive first-person shooter when player performance isn't based off of individual player skill but rather by the value of the equipment you've equipped and the amount of gimmicks and bonuses you've received over time?

Sooo... like every other MMO out there?

While it does clear up the point,
what people tend to forget is that Dust is neither JUST a typical FPS nor JUST a typical MMO.
its a hybrid,taking concepts from BOTH types.
So no,performance is indeed not solely based on players skill like in most FPS games.
But THAT is precicely the whole idea behind the concept:
the more u battle,the more u can learn and earn and the better trained and equiped u can become.
Add to that teaming up with squads/corps,wich i can vouch for,makes it a LOT more challenging when facing communicating squads with a rag-tag bunch of lone wolves.

It's the RPG elements thrown into the game that CCP has been misusing. Unlike a normal competitive shooter, your performance isn't based off of real skill but rather by the equipment you use and the amount of skill points you've accumulated. This is a problem. After all, CCP has claimed that Dust will be a competitive FPS suited for the e-sports scene, but how could you have a competitive first-person shooter when player performance isn't based off of individual player skill but rather by the value of the equipment you've equipped and the amount of gimmicks and bonuses you've received over time?

In real life sports(from F1 with the superhightech cars to a golfer with a more refined club) the person with best equipment and gear has the advantage why should it be any different in dust.

OP needs to look at his playstyle again if all these people are killing him with his ease and no skill then he may not be playing right.

I wont go in details but all these where its total noob against expereinced player the noob will loose unless some spefic situations

You don't have F1 cars that goes around the track in 10 seconds. F1 is a regulated motor sport, and is millions of rules implemented every year, to make sure that one team doesn't have to much of an advantage.

A similar rule applies to golf, and any other sport.

Fail argument.

It's the RPG elements thrown into the game that CCP has been misusing. Unlike a normal competitive shooter, your performance isn't based off of real skill but rather by the equipment you use and the amount of skill points you've accumulated. This is a problem. After all, CCP has claimed that Dust will be a competitive FPS suited for the e-sports scene, but how could you have a competitive first-person shooter when player performance isn't based off of individual player skill but rather by the value of the equipment you've equipped and the amount of gimmicks and bonuses you've received over time?

I go positive K/D against people with better gear all the time.

Get good.

I think the OP might be having a problem adjusting to the fact that there are multiple roles in DUST that require altering your play style to counter. In most other FPS's you can treat all opponents the same regardless of what weapon/load-out they are using. DUST has far more Rock/Paper/Scissors.

He is likely mistaking being owned by weapons in their sweet spot for the weapons being OP and "noobish".

Sooo... like every other MMO out there?

While it does clear up the point,
what people tend to forget is that Dust is neither JUST a typical FPS nor JUST a typical MMO.
its a hybrid,taking concepts from BOTH types.
So no,performance is indeed not solely based on players skill like in most FPS games.
But THAT is precicely the whole idea behind the concept:
the more u battle,the more u can learn and earn and the better trained and equiped u can become.
Add to that teaming up with squads/corps,wich i can vouch for,makes it a LOT more challenging when facing communicating squads with a rag-tag bunch of lone wolves.

This game is not an MMO. Only EVE players feel like they're playing a MMO. Everyone else is playing an arena shooter.