|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 04:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Thanks everybody who voted for option #2 |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 04:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Why are you complaining? Yea, I know all you want to do is farm, so Ambush becomes your "only" option once you've capped, but every game you play after you cap gets you further and further ahead of those of us that simply can't, or don't, play nearly as often as you.
Entitled much?
I don't understand why you care if I farm or not seeing as we'll probably never corp battle against each other, or you'll lose anyways. Players shouldn't be forced into ambush, because it's the most efficient use of their time in acquiring not only SP but ISK. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 07:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Kind of interesting when you look at the big picture.
People say why bother with skirmish after the cap because they can grind more SP from ambush... but has anybody analyzed that statement? Is the entire point of this game to grind SP? Is that the ONLY reason many of us play? If so, why are we so focused on it? Is it to level up our gear so we can have more fun in the end? Or is it simply a mountain top we relentlessly want to climb just because it's there?
I dunno, I am starting to think 100% passive SP is the only way to go for a game like this. That way players can focus on having fun, honing their skills, and getting as much ISK as possible to pay for our fancy suits so we can do crazy stuff in matches and enjoy ourselves. Rather than having the obligation to log on every day or so just to grind grind grind SP so we don't fall behind.
I think no matter what SP earning system they use, it will always feel like a job and something we do so we can hit that cap and log off. Because when you look at the big picture and wonder why people play, having fun should be #1, but it most certainly is not the norm in Dust.
Well considering the general population on this game is a bunch of sissy ass CareBears afraid to lose corpbattles Hellstorm among many others. The only thing to really do is grind out SP. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 07:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:We have a paradox situation. In a different universe, protoman is beeing called militiaman and stated that ambush matches are pointless cause of the option #5 has beeing picked. Watchout maybe the whole universe is going to collapse soonGäó due to the controversal posting thats going on here.
Hey continue to go 9/8 in corp battles buddy. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 08:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Mr Zitro wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Y0UR NAME HERE wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I say we fix the people suddenly whining about Skirmish SP, and just cut the amount of SP you can earn in each ambush game after cap to 500.
1000 is still way too high for 10 minute games That'd make you happy wouldn't it? If you're so worried about falling behind why are you spending your time trolling the forums and not earning sp? And once more, the Imperfects fail to see that I'm not campaigning on my own personal behalf. I don't care about SP for myself, I frequently fail to hit the cap, yet still trash a good number of players in this game. I'm simply concerned with the overall growth of this game, since it's designed to span years into the future and be constantly growing and evolving. So, sorry for standing by my belief that a slow and steady rate of progression for SP is the way to go, because it promotes equality while still allowing those with actual skill to shine. The simple problem is that people these days feel they have to be rewarded for taking a freaking dump. Not everything is a contest. Not everyone cares. You're plenty rewarded as is, quit trying to inflate your egos, very few of us want to get covered in your mess when you finally pop. Question do you really believe the stuff you say? You are saying an unfair game by nature should be fair. I think you are playing the wrong game
It's crazy how CareBears want a game that is supposed to be unfair by nature to be fair. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:xprotoman23 wrote:I don't understand why you care if I farm or not seeing as we'll probably never corp battle against each other, or you'll lose anyways. Players shouldn't be forced into ambush, because it's the most efficient use of their time in acquiring not only SP but ISK. Because, as usual, you fail to see anything more than yourself. It's about the bigger picture, about keeping players fairly even in skill progression without overly punishing those who can't afford to enslave themselves to a game, while not overly rewarding the loyal gamer at the same time. This has nothing to do with me and you, it has to do with everyone who plays DUST. [So technically it is about us, but only a tiny little bit, especially you. You have no right to complain about anything related to SP >_<] As far as I'm concerned, you should only get up to 500SP in Ambush (after cap, of course) I'm just looking forward to this new SP system their touting, should be interesting. This is a huge lie everyone who voted for option 2 is telling themselves. A cap just ensures everyone already here will always have a significant SP advantage, no matter how good or bad they are. I'm fine with passive and weekly bonus SP, but 1WP = 1SP should not be capped. This will promote (not saying force) playing the shortest game mode always just because there are more rewards, and who wants to miss out?
^truth |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 16:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Orin the Freak wrote:We should continue to whine about people who cry for ners/etc, all the while also crying about a temporary mechanic that will probably only be around for a few more weeks.
hypocrisy is the most puzzling, yet definitive human trait.
also, as far as keeping the soft cap, one word: Pacing.
already discussed it. stop trying to rush this game. are you seriously trying to beat Dust? I think it should take someone a year+ to fully max A SINGLE CLASS (Including TII/III gear). stop crying for more SP, hunker down for the long-haul and HTFU, it's gonna be a bumpy ride.
Nice rage quit in the corp battle the other day. Sure as hell didn't see your pathetic score at the end of the match. |
xprotoman23
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1452
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 16:38:00 -
[8] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:xprotoman23 wrote:I don't understand why you care if I farm or not seeing as we'll probably never corp battle against each other, or you'll lose anyways. Players shouldn't be forced into ambush, because it's the most efficient use of their time in acquiring not only SP but ISK. Because, as usual, you fail to see anything more than yourself. It's about the bigger picture, about keeping players fairly even in skill progression without overly punishing those who can't afford to enslave themselves to a game, while not overly rewarding the loyal gamer at the same time. This has nothing to do with me and you, it has to do with everyone who plays DUST. [So technically it is about us, but only a tiny little bit, especially you. You have no right to complain about anything related to SP >_<] As far as I'm concerned, you should only get up to 500SP in Ambush (after cap, of course) I'm just looking forward to this new SP system their touting, should be interesting. This is a huge lie everyone who voted for option 2 is telling themselves. A cap just ensures everyone already here will always have a significant SP advantage, no matter how good or bad they are. I'm fine with passive and weekly bonus SP, but 1WP = 1SP should not be capped. This will promote (not saying force) playing the shortest game mode always just because there are more rewards, and who wants to miss out?
None of the CareBears will respond to this post. |
|
|
|