Why was there so little damage to each other, I know you both have enough isk to actually throw down

I already posted the kills, and SI managed 3 total since Saturday, while we killed the 10 that showed up to fight. Not only that, but of the ISK spent on ships during this war, 67% of all losses were from SI, not ZTCD. In case you missed the report:

http://ziontcd.eve-kill.net/?a=cc_detail&ctr_id=20519

Fail troll is fail.

Um... Doesn't it clearly state that Zion lost almost twice as much ISK as SI did? At least those are the numbers I'm seeing on the link.

That said, good luck to SI in their continuing war.

It is a fact that you lead in kills; however, although I don't play EVE myself, I think ISK is more important, isn't it?

It really depends on your perspective as to which is more important. I think both stats are equally important.

Well, if I lose more ships but also have more ISK, I can easily buy the same ones or something else. On the other hand, you wouldn't be able to replenish your forces that quickly, due to more ISK getting lost and the higher costs of ships destroyed. I don't know about general EVE population's stance on this, but here is my perspective. And this is why I believe SI has an advantage at this moment.

Most of our Eve pilots are very young in game and don't have expensive ships - the ships being lost (on our side) are by these younger pilots. Also, because they are younger, they don't have the Skill Points, ISK, and Firepower to kill the more expensive ships that SI has brought - so they kill what they can. Think fighting against a proto assault suit in a militia suit, but being able to see recognize you are outclassed from a longer range (unlike in Dust where you sometimes have to be within 20 meters to see what kind of suit you are up against, sniping excluded for one of the best snipers in the game :P ).

ISK is the only thing that matters. If you kill 1000 T1 rifters and we kill 1 titan we still win the war.

interesting. Zion claims to be the victor when they clearly surrendered. I dont know about you but in my opinion when you are about to win you dont stop. Except you are really stupid.

So Zion maybe won a few battles but couldn't handle the war

you call this a kb https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=warning&l=http%3a%2f%2fziontcd.eve-kill.net%2f%3fa%3dcc_detail%26amp%3bctr_id%3d20519&domain=eve-kill.net


here a kb http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=alon+blackhelm


you corp need some work go get some moms and titans and a few carriers and go try too take over some null sec space
then let see how that kb looks

interesting. Zion claims to be the victor when they clearly surrendered. I dont know about you but in my opinion when you are about to win you dont stop. Except I'm really stupid.

then it shouldnt be a problem to start it all over again. Only if thats actually the case.

Quick update from the KB: Zion's efficiency dropped almost to 25%. Another battleship down, I assume?

I still don't see how can this situation be claimed as winning to Zion.

any other retired eve pilots look at this and think it resembles 2 toddlers screaming and scratching at each other?

It would be better if you kept the eve stuff on the eve forums, I play dust to escape internet spaceship epeens, most retired pilots have more kills then both your alliances put together.

Don't know Eve well, but I would think dropping efficiency AFTER a wardec is over wouldn't be a factor in the results of a wardec. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I know little about Eve.

Well, the war still continues during the 24 hours after "the end" of the war. Moreover, as mentioned before, this was cause by a glitch, and the war will resume once the cooldown is over.

Ok, thanks for clearing that up for me.

Edit: One more question; Is it clear that SI was the cause of the drop in efficiency? I can't make heads or tails of that stat sheet.

we had to battleships lost thats why we lost the efficiency rating. however that being said both losses were pilot error and error on myself as well. some others mentioned these small isk numbers dont mean much because they dont take into account pilot errors..

prior to the errors we were way ahead

i know all this because "i was there"

Yes; that spreadsheet shows kills of SI ships and losses taken during fights with SI members. Thus, since Zion's ISK losses are three times as much as SI losses, herein comes the efficient rating of 25%.