| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Don Von Hulio
UnReaL.
90
   |
Posted - 2013.02.03 11:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
The turrets are vehicle like, and the rest of the emplacements are huge hulking metal things. Which, when i think of AV nades i think of them seeking vehicles by magnetism. |
Prangstar RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
Legacy Rising
63
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 12:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
I have to kinda agree on this one, however,if they do damage i would suggest they do less damage against OMS items. |
Vyzion Eyri
The Southern Legion
155
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 13:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'm guessing AV grenades seek objects based on their size and movement. In other words, if its big and moves, it'll home in on it. If it simply acted on magnetism they wouldn't leave your hand.
|
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection
Caldari State
666
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 15:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vyzion Eyri wrote:I'm guessing AV grenades seek objects based on their size and movement. In other words, if its big and moves, it'll home in on it. If it simply acted on magnetism they wouldn't leave your hand.
Interesting speculation. An AV grenade will still blow up a tank that is standing still. I believe it is because the AV grenades are triggered when they attach to anything with wheels. When they see wheels they go boom.
How about this, gun emplacements use shielding technology to diffuse AV grenades that interferes with vehicle drive and navigation technology.
Or the AV grenade is triggered by engine signature. No engine no explosion. Then you could have an engine signature dampening module, and higher tier grenades that are better vs. low engine signatureGǪ |
Martin0 Brancaleone
Maphia Clan Corporation
CRONOS.
191
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 15:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
I've destroyed an istallation with av 'nades. |
DeathStalker Synchro
D3ath D3alers
RISE of LEGION
24
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 16:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
I was wondering the dame thing. Though, when you think about it , there would be no installations due to naders. I'm not saying it shouldn't be done or it shouldn't be done because of this but it just a likely possibility. |
Valmar Shadereaver
Lost-Legion
18
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
av grenade's or anti vechical grenade's are used for vechical's this wuild require specail grenade's known as anti instalation grenade's otherwise youd get a lav near a instalation you throw AV and it flies to the instalation and you are a road bump for the lav
id rather wait for some other means to kill the instalation and keep my fit whitout turning into a expensive road bump
altough some1 will have to request/sugest for anti instalation grenade's obviusly im hapy enof whit curent means to destroy them |
Full Metal Kitten
Sinq Laison Gendarmes
Gallente Federation
152
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
We need C4 explosives for installations. 30 second timer and they can be disarmed via hacking mechanic. |
Valmar Shadereaver
Lost-Legion
18
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
there are remote explosive you place a few run and detonate |
Patoman Radiant
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
53
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 02:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
It makes sense for a AV to be able to blow up a installation.
But if you are close enough to throw a grenade on it (turret in its deadzone), you are close enough to hack it and use it, which saves the grenade for something later and allows the installation to work for you.
So it is hardly op, anyone close enough to use a grenade on a structure can hack it, and every suit regardless of equipment can hack. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |