|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Grezkev
The Red Guards
100
   |
Posted - 2013.01.23 04:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
iReporters, share your answers to the following:
1) There have been some questions raised about how Corporations should be ranked, specifically in the objective format that gives all players a realistic understanding of what they're getting into and who they are looking at. What specifically do you disagree with regarding a Points-Only perspective or a comparison of Points-To-Kills?
2) What certain skill bases do you think naturally draw more points and thus probably favoritism within the Corporate system in general?
3) What sort of 3-way comparison do you think would suit corporations best? 3-way referring to a comparison between Size, Points, and overall Kills? |
Grezkev
The Red Guards
100
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 17:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Could Zion, SI, SyN, IMP, Bunnies, and WTF list their membership numbers? |
Grezkev
The Red Guards
100
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 18:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Grezkev wrote:Could Zion, SI, SyN, IMP, Bunnies, and WTF list their membership numbers? Or.. you could get into dat metagame and start finding out yourself? :D
I was unaware you could see the numbers in game. Where do you find that? |
Grezkev
The Red Guards
100
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 18:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Baracka Flocka Flame wrote:So tired of all these people trying to rank the corps currently in game.
First off, DON'T use any of the in-game stats/leaderboards.
Second, if you want to make a proper ranking it can't just be the writer's opinion, ya thats cool and we have had plenty of threads like that but if you want to properly rate a team you need a group of very experienced competitive players(pref. leaders of the top corps) to rank the teams.
Third, you need a rating system, a proper one on how you/your judges would rate the teams.
Fourth, you need to actually be able to bring together a lot of people who dont get along, to get along and rate corps un-biased. Which in this community i can't ever see happening... lol
So ya i guess we will just keep doing these rankings based on whatever one person thinks.(i.e dusters)
This, I would think, would require a bit of activity and cooperation between GNN and Corp leaders....I'm sure Liz and the Admin staff would be willing to do that. |
Grezkev
The Red Guards
100
|
Posted - 2013.01.24 03:11:00 -
[5] - Quote
supersayinb wrote:Necrodermis wrote:i feel that if there was a corp rank system that would be a good indication to boycott any "leet" teams.
you see their match you can go ahead and skip out on facing them because why waste the resources for a known loss.
like playing a fighting game, you don't want to play with the person who plays it all day. only the people who play like they do will bother playing.
skip out of facing them sure the "leet" corp might think you are a coward but you get to keep more of your isk. and that is what the game is about.
especially in these small matches with pathetic numbers. why would i want to have 8 vs 8 when i know they are going to be min maxed off eachothers abilities using 8 prototype heavy suits with 8 prototype mass drivers with 8 prototype locus grenades.
not worth it and a waste of time unless you are doing the same thing than more power to you. So you wouldn't fight any of the "good" corps? 
^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Total WP divided by the number of members... Exactly, thats what I have been saying.. But with out the amount of players in each corp all stats are meaningless.
What about WP divided by Member numbers, then some way to factor in Average corp KDR? Such as adding the Average KDR, or multiplying by it...? |
|
|
| |
|