Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Yackoff Smirnoff
STAR HAMMERS
4
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
I, being carried the whole match by this automated blaster turret. when some guy runs right past it ......
and the automated turret misses him, then he kills me!
if the turret wasnt so stupid, i would not die
i'm like wtf they need to fix the AI on the blaster turrets to hit running targets better yes? |
Sandromin Hes
Sand Mercenary Corps Inc.
204
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yackoff Smirnoff wrote:I, being carried the whole match by this automated blaster turret. when some guy runs right past it ...... and the automated turret misses him, then he kills me! if the turret wasnt so stupid, i would not die i'm like wtf they need to fix the AI on the blaster turrets to hit running targets better yes?
lolno.
In Mother Russia, friendly AI kills you! |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
288
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
If anything those things need the automated response removed completely. Be manned or be damned. |
Paran Tadec
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
902
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
uuuhhh no. |
Yackoff Smirnoff
STAR HAMMERS
4
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
perhaps you would consider a reduction to the strafe speed then so the automated turret could have a easier time hitting it's target? |
Paran Tadec
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
902
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
no x2 |
Tectonious Falcon
The Southern Legion
395
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:29:00 -
[7] - Quote
Yackoff Smirnoff wrote:perhaps you would consider a reduction to the strafe speed then so the automated turret could have a easier time hitting it's target? If strafing were any slower, we'd be bricks. If you suggest strafing nerfs, please stop and consider how crap the game would be.
Also I get sniped by unmanned rail gun installations, the AI is more accurate than a human. |
Sontie
VENGEANCE FOR HIRE
94
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:32:00 -
[8] - Quote
Develop battlefield awareness. An AI turret should not be more deadly than a manned one. |
Yackoff Smirnoff
STAR HAMMERS
4
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
i am speaking on the behalf of us players who like to seek the protection from AI, we are a small but vocal bunch and our voices will be heard in new eden, perhaps we should lament and lobby to have precision strikes become AI based. when we say we want better AI we also mean by that we want more AI. there is no choice between quality/quanity there is only both |
Icy Tiger
Universal Allies Inc.
1026
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
Yackoff Smirnoff wrote:i am speaking on the behalf of us players who like to seek the protection from AI, we are a small but vocal bunch and our voices will be heard in new eden, perhaps we should lament and lobby to have precision strikes become AI based. when we say we want better AI we also mean by that we want more AI. there is no choice between quality/quanity there is only both
F*** that. |
|
Fivetimes Infinity
Immobile Infantry
1086
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:If anything those things need the automated response removed completely. Be manned or be damned.
I agree with this. Nothing should be automated in this game, at least nothing capable of killing players should be automated. Save the AI for Drone Infestation. |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 03:49:00 -
[12] - Quote
What? ANY AI they can add to this battlefield of repetitiveness is good. You guys are either insane, heavies, or just bad. Turrets doing there job, if anything we need to be able to deploy them ourselves >: ) |
Beyobi
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
44
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 04:02:00 -
[13] - Quote
Yackoff Smirnoff wrote:i am speaking on the behalf of us players who like to seek the protection from AI, we are a small but vocal bunch and our voices will be heard in new eden, perhaps we should lament and lobby to have precision strikes become AI based. when we say we want better AI we also mean by that we want more AI. there is no choice between quality/quanity there is only both
Why don't you seek protection from your teammates instead of the computer? This is the chickenshit I'm talking about. People can't play decently so they hide behind an automated player that has top notch precision and awarness. F*ck you, use the turret or die by it. Why is computer assistance even considered in this situation? Why?
|
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2046
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 04:03:00 -
[14] - Quote
Fivetimes Infinity wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:If anything those things need the automated response removed completely. Be manned or be damned. I agree with this. Nothing should be automated in this game, at least nothing capable of killing players should be automated. Save the AI for Drone Infestation. I disagree, eventually we will be dropping these down in when maps become larger to defend specific areas. We shouldn't have to waste manpower to make them something more than an ornament. That said, they should be less effective when they are unmanned, perhaps something like more bullet spread.
Ps The turning speed needs to stay the same wether it is manned or unmanned. |
Beyobi
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
44
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 04:06:00 -
[15] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:What? ANY AI they can add to this battlefield of repetitiveness is good. You guys are either insane, heavies, or just bad. Turrets doing there job, if anything we need to be able to deploy them ourselves >: )
A.I. Does Not Belong Multiplayer FPS Battles. If I want the game to kick my ass I'll play the single player experience. If I want a living bag of fat to kick my ass I'll play the Multiplayer experience. |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 04:27:00 -
[16] - Quote
Beyobi wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:What? ANY AI they can add to this battlefield of repetitiveness is good. You guys are either insane, heavies, or just bad. Turrets doing there job, if anything we need to be able to deploy them ourselves >: ) A.I. Does Not Belong Multiplayer FPS Battles. If I want the game to kick my ass I'll play the single player experience. If I want a living bag of fat to kick my ass I'll play the Multiplayer experience. Gtfo. You seriously don't want any AI in your games? Go play CoD or BF3 then. I want a game that's much more then an average FPS, and AI could add so much to every aspect of this game.
And saying what belongs and doesn't belong based on past experiences means nothing. CCP is doing new things never done before for a reason. |
Fivetimes Infinity
Immobile Infantry
1086
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 05:05:00 -
[17] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:I disagree, eventually we will be dropping these down in when maps become larger to defend specific areas. We shouldn't have to waste manpower to make them something more than an ornament. That said, they should be less effective when they are unmanned, perhaps something like more bullet spread.
Ps The turning speed needs to stay the same wether it is manned or unmanned.
You'll have more people to shoot turrets if you end up fighting on larger maps.
Although, there's a solution to this that would work in everyone's favour. Having a remote turret interface structure, which allows people playing on defence to remotely take control of turrets their team has deployed, would help minimize the number of people you'd need on defence on larger maps (a job that can be really boring) while also not making turrets utterly useless of they aren't manned. Letting one person jump from controlling turrets anywhere on the map, or anywhere within range of the interface structure, would probably satisfy both of our concerns. |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1772
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 05:10:00 -
[18] - Quote
Fivetimes Infinity wrote:Sleepy Zan wrote:I disagree, eventually we will be dropping these down in when maps become larger to defend specific areas. We shouldn't have to waste manpower to make them something more than an ornament. That said, they should be less effective when they are unmanned, perhaps something like more bullet spread.
Ps The turning speed needs to stay the same wether it is manned or unmanned. You'll have more people to shoot turrets if you end up fighting on larger maps. Although, there's a solution to this that would work in everyone's favour. Having a remote turret interface structure, which allows people playing on defence to remotely take control of turrets their team has deployed, would help minimize the number of people you'd need on defence on larger maps (a job that can be really boring) while also not making turrets utterly useless of they aren't manned. Letting one person jump from controlling turrets anywhere on the map, or anywhere within range of the interface structure, would probably satisfy both of our concerns. I can use my PS3 controller to turn on my TV - but 1000's of years into the future I can't wirelessly control a turret.
Gotta love CCP logic. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 05:48:00 -
[19] - Quote
Beyobi wrote:Yackoff Smirnoff wrote:i am speaking on the behalf of us players who like to seek the protection from AI, we are a small but vocal bunch and our voices will be heard in new eden, perhaps we should lament and lobby to have precision strikes become AI based. when we say we want better AI we also mean by that we want more AI. there is no choice between quality/quanity there is only both Why don't you seek protection from your teammates instead of the computer? This is the chickenshit I'm talking about. People can't play decently so they hide behind an automated player that has top notch precision and awarness. F*ck you, use the turret or die by it. Why is computer assistance even considered in this situation? Why?
Without the hostility...I was going to say the same thing. If you seek protection...seek it from your teammates. Blasters in the middle of the field is one of those bonehead design flaws |
I-Shayz-I
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
172
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 05:52:00 -
[20] - Quote
Blaster turrets are kinda ******** in a way though...
They will shoot until they overheat, and then stop shooting.
Railguns though...you can be driving past them super fast and boom you're dead. |
|
theschizogenious
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
167
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 05:59:00 -
[21] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:Yackoff Smirnoff wrote:i am speaking on the behalf of us players who like to seek the protection from AI, we are a small but vocal bunch and our voices will be heard in new eden, perhaps we should lament and lobby to have precision strikes become AI based. when we say we want better AI we also mean by that we want more AI. there is no choice between quality/quanity there is only both F*** that.
somebody is heading down a bad road |
Yackoff Smirnoff
STAR HAMMERS
4
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 08:49:00 -
[22] - Quote
would it be acceptable for me to petition for the AI driven orbital strikes? which we shall petition a limit to them at 3 per minute.
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 09:24:00 -
[23] - Quote
Someone seems to think they're fine... |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |