DUST Search - Mass driver

All Channels

General Discussions

Mass driver > Missiles

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ted Nugget SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 74	Posted - 2013.01.21 20:20:00 - [1] - Quote I don't understand how a mass driver is way more effective at killing infantry. CCP you really need to get "balancing" a fps down. That is all.
Cody Sietz Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising 63	Posted - 2013.01.21 20:24:00 - [2] - Quote Just make a MD turret and problem solved. Small turret only, and make them blow up mid air so dropships cant spam them unless they get to close to the ground.
Ted Nugget SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 74	Posted - 2013.01.21 20:58:00 - [3] - Quote Cody Sietz wrote: Just make a MD turret and problem solved. Small turret only, and make them blow up mid air so dropships cant spam them unless they get to close to the ground. Mass drivers aren't shot from dropships.. not sure what u meant by that
MassiveNine Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION 100	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:01:00 - [4] - Quote Ted Nugget wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Just make a MD turret and problem solved. Small turret only, and make them blow up mid air so dropships cant spam them unless they get to close to the ground. Mass drivers aren't shot from dropships.. not sure what u meant by that He's saying make a grenade launcher turret and have a limited range on them so they can't be spammed from the ceiling.
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 3064	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:03:00 - [5] - Quote Missiles are crap, and need a buff in splash radius. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=48300 Thread about it in feedback/requests (where it belongs)
DEADPOOL5241 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 231	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:11:00 - [6] - Quote Ted Nugget wrote: I don't understand how a mass driver is way more effective at killing infantry. CCP you really need to get "balancing" a fps down. That is all. Tank has Infinity ammo (unrealistic) MD has limited ammo per magazine and on player. Tank has 4000 EHP vs infantry 400 EHP Tank has 3 guns vs MD has 6-8 shots and has to reload. MD players throws Flux grenade into group of players, all shields are gone and fires 1-2 MD shots into group to get kills. Tank rolls up on group of players and has 3 guys firing at infantry to get kills.. gee which one of these is OP.. You can't compare Tanks missiles with MD. Apples to Oranges Ted..
Goat of Dover Shadow Company HQ 161	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:14:00 - [7] - Quote So true Ted. I hope you guys actually get something done to missile turrets. It is really sad the stage they are in now. But in all honesty all small turrets need a little tweak to make them a little bit more effective but not to overpowering because you got two on a tank. So they have to remember that what ever they do to it will be two fold on a tank.
Ted Nugget SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 74	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:17:00 - [8] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Missiles are crap, and need a buff in splash radius. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=48300 Thread about it in feedback/requests (where it belongs) General discussion... i wasnted to discuss it... dont come in here telling me where to put my posts.... you dont like it get off it
Ted Nugget SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 74	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:17:00 - [9] - Quote DEADPOOL5241 wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: I don't understand how a mass driver is way more effective at killing infantry. CCP you really need to get "balancing" a fps down. That is all. Tank has Infinity ammo (unrealistic) MD has limited ammo per magazine and on player. Tank has 4000 EHP vs infantry 400 EHP Tank has 3 guns vs MD has 6-8 shots and has to reload. MD players throws Flux grenade into group of players, all shields are gone and fires 1-2 MD shots into group to get kills. Tank rolls up on group of players and has 3 guys firing at infantry to get kills.. gee which one of these is OP.. You can't compare Tanks missiles with MD. Apples to Oranges Ted.. **** you
DEADPOOL5241 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 231	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:18:00 - [10] - Quote Do agree with Ted, Missile turrets need a small boost. I see a missile tank and I laugh at them for having missiles on. +1 to you Ted for trying buddy

DEADPOOL5241 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 231	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:19:00 - [11] - Quote Ted Nugget wrote: DEADPOOL5241 wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: I don't understand how a mass driver is way more effective at killing infantry. CCP you really need to get "balancing" a fps down. That is all. Tank has Infinity ammo (unrealistic) MD has limited ammo per magazine and on player. Tank has 4000 EHP vs infantry 400 EHP Tank has 3 guns vs MD has 6-8 shots and has to reload. MD players throws Flux grenade into group of players, all shields are gone and fires 1-2 MD shots into group to get kills. Tank rolls up on group of players and has 3 guys firing at infantry to get kills.. gee which one of these is OP.. You can't compare Tanks missiles with MD. Apples to Oranges Ted.. **** you I love you to Ted!
Ted Nugget SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 74	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:22:00 - [12] - Quote DEADPOOL5241 wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: DEADPOOL5241 wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: I don't understand how a mass driver is way more effective at killing infantry. CCP you really need to get "balancing" a fps down. That is all. Tank has Infinity ammo (unrealistic) MD has limited ammo per magazine and on player. Tank has 4000 EHP vs infantry 400 EHP Tank has 3 guns vs MD has 6-8 shots and has to reload. MD players throws Flux grenade into group of players, all shields are gone and fires 1-2 MD shots into group to get kills. Tank rolls up on group of players and has 3 guys firing at infantry to get kills.. gee which one of these is OP.. You can't compare Tanks missiles with MD. Apples to Oranges Ted.. **** you I love you to Ted! all seriousness... a missile tank is not op if you ever used one you would know this...
DEADPOOL5241 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 231	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:25:00 - [13] - Quote Ted Nugget wrote: DEADPOOL5241 wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: DEADPOOL5241 wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: I don't understand how a mass driver is way more effective at killing infantry. CCP you really need to get "balancing" a fps down. That is all. Tank has Infinity ammo (unrealistic) MD has limited ammo per magazine and on player. Tank has 4000 EHP vs infantry 400 EHP Tank has 3 guns vs MD has 6-8 shots and has to reload. MD players throws Flux grenade into group of players, all shields are gone and fires 1-2 MD shots into group to get kills. Tank rolls up on group of players and has 3 guys firing at infantry to get kills.. gee which one of these is OP.. You can't compare Tanks missiles with MD. Apples to Oranges Ted.. **** you I love you to Ted! all seriousness... a missile tank is not op if you ever used one you would know this... 100% agree, Missile tank needs to be buffed. Radius and damage by at least 10 to 15% to both. Never disagreed with you Ted, just not sure why an infantry weapon is being compared to a tank weapon. :)
Ted Nugget SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 74	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:32:00 - [14] - Quote if your not sure then find another post to troll
Gunner Nightingale Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 215	Posted - 2013.01.21 21:52:00 - [15] - Quote MD's are fine yes i use one but still they are fine, it is missles that need a slight buff they took a bit too much of a hit, but the other thing is placing MD shots is easier than shooting missles on a moving vehicle. Also if you timed a flux nade from a teammate then fired those missles id guarantee they would do better(granted their radius is half that of MD so perhaps instead of a damage buff a radius buff is the right answer).
Mr Zitro Imperfects Negative-Feedback 417	Posted - 2013.01.21 22:05:00 - [16] - Quote Ted Nugget wrote: I don't understand how a mass driver is way more effective at killing infantry. CCP you really need to get "balancing" a fps down. That is all. Just like AV nades doing more damage than swarms and forges... It's CCP logic
The legend345 Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 73	Posted - 2013.01.21 22:25:00 - [17] - Quote Mr Zitro wrote: Ted Nugget wrote: I don't understand how a mass driver is way more effective at killing infantry. CCP you really need to get "balancing" a fps down. That is all. Just like AV nades doing more damage than swarms and forges... It's CCP logic im not a tanker this build but i was last build and can say AV grenades are WAYYYY too powerful.
Zat Earthshatter Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 304	Posted - 2013.01.21 22:33:00 - [18] - Quote It's an "overreaction" nerf. Back in the E3 build, when we still played "Old Skirmish" on Plateaus (you newbies call it Gribalkir South Ward), dropships would fly on top of the massive towers, and pelt missiles upon your battle from sniper-range. They also had a large kill-radius to boot. Although this was too much, so was the nerf. Missiles now disappear over a relatively short distance, and even a direct hit won't kill off your opponent. Add this to the vehicle-turret inheritance, a problem from day one, and you're better off with the railgun Small Turrets.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.