Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kain Spero
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
907
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 08:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
I think that corporation names in contracts should be hidden (or have an option of being hidden). This should reduce folks ducking corp battles and also add more importance to the metagame and intelligence gathering since knowing what corp you are up against would be of huge tactical importance. |
Jimbeezy
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
219
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 08:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Amazing Idea +1 |
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
328
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 08:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Long overdue.
Kind of amazing CCP hasn't noticed this as a problem yet. |
G-SLicK
Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic
185
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 08:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
yea you shouldn't be able to see who your playing against until you actually join the game lobby ready to fight |
2-Ton Twenty-One
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
235
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 08:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
+1
Put up or shut up! |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers
117
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 14:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
Im sure this would have nothing to do with the mere fact that you can't get corp battles due to the 'stigma' your corp has created for itself.
The bottom line is the rampant BS your crew has fed this community the past few months is the main reason no one wants anything to do with you.
In normal circumstances, I would bet corporations would look forward to the on-field challenge a well-organized battle would provide, which I'm sure is exactly what you guys do every time you get a battle.
However, all the verbal baggage that you so freely provide afterward is going to deter corps from repeating that situation. And no this doesnt apply to everyone in your group, but you know as well as any that this is what happens. Now you have to deal with the negative outlook the vast majority of this community has toward you.
from the bigger picture of the layout of this game, I don't think hiding the names of the corps for the battle over a territory makes any sense at all. Sure from the limited viewpoint of a closed beta with such a small playerbase you may have good reasoning, but I don't see this being a viable change from the greater perspective of the EVE/Dust Universe.
I'm sorry but this sounds like a plea to devs to step in and fix an isolated problem that was self-created.
If my crew controls a particular planet, or area of a planet, what have you, and we are being challenged for that area, I don't see any reason why we shouldn't know who our attacker is... this isn't space set in medival times where we lack the technology to know who is approaching our system beforehand...
|
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
317
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 14:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:Im sure this would have nothing to do with the mere fact that you can't get corp battles due to the 'stigma' your corp has created for itself.
The bottom line is the rampant BS your crew has fed this community the past few months is the main reason no one wants anything to do with you.
In normal circumstances, I would bet corporations would look forward to the on-field challenge a well-organized battle would provide, which I'm sure is exactly what you guys do every time you get a battle.
However, all the verbal baggage that you so freely provide afterward is going to deter corps from repeating that situation. And no this doesnt apply to everyone in your group, but you know as well as any that this is what happens. Now you have to deal with the negative outlook the vast majority of this community has toward you.
from the bigger picture of the layout of this game, I don't think hiding the names of the corps for the battle over a territory makes any sense at all. Sure from the limited viewpoint of a closed beta with such a small playerbase you may have good reasoning, but I don't see this being a viable change from the greater perspective of the EVE/Dust Universe.
I'm sorry but this sounds like a plea to devs to step in and fix an isolated problem that was self-created.
If my crew controls a particular planet, or area of a planet, what have you, and we are being challenged for that area, I don't see any reason why we shouldn't know who our attacker is... this isn't space set in medival times where we lack the technology to know who is approaching our system beforehand...
LOL so based on what your saying........most of the other corps hate us and they hide behind their excuse for not fighting us because they want to "teach us a lesson by not fighting us". This sounds more like I hate you guys but I know our corp cant beat you guys so instead I say we will not fight them to "teach them to be nicer" as an excuse to hide our inability to win in a fight. |
RECON BY FIRE
BetaMax.
51
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 15:41:00 -
[8] - Quote
It does seem a little odd that it appears to be only Imperfects that support this idea. But as to whether its a good idea or not Im kinda neutral. I dont really see the point of hiding who youre fighting, but I guess it could add some mystery to the game? I just dont get it really. |
VicBoss
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
135
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 15:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
+1 for sure |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
742
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 16:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sorry guise, were boycotting imperfects pce.
But seriously, +1 |
|
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1043
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 16:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
can't hide forever Jason scrub :-)
+1 mainly for the intel part of it as I lvoe the meta game in eve. IMPS will get their corp battles no worry |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
742
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 16:39:00 -
[12] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:can't hide forever Jason scrub :-)
+1 mainly for the intel part of it as I lvoe the meta game in eve. IMPS will get their corp battles no worry
Mate, I'm not hiding.. I'm in a strategic position ready to ambush :D |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1043
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 16:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Free Beers wrote:can't hide forever Jason scrub :-)
+1 mainly for the intel part of it as I lvoe the meta game in eve. IMPS will get their corp battles no worry Mate, I'm not hiding.. I'm in a strategic position ready to ambush :D
I don't see your corp disclaimer anymore. Does that mean this is your offical corporate position? |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
742
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 16:45:00 -
[14] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Free Beers wrote:can't hide forever Jason scrub :-)
+1 mainly for the intel part of it as I lvoe the meta game in eve. IMPS will get their corp battles no worry Mate, I'm not hiding.. I'm in a strategic position ready to ambush :D I don't see your corp disclaimer anymore. Does that mean this is your offical corporate position?
Shh, don't tell any imperfects but they're all hiding behind that hill over there. *Points* They're like, Ninjas or something. :D
______ Jason Pearson in no way represents Crux Special Tasks Group or it's members.
|
Tiel Syysch
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
634
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 16:48:00 -
[15] - Quote
I've asked for this since before they implemented the corp battles. You shouldn't know who you're fighting until you hit the war barge and see them load in. |
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
328
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 16:50:00 -
[16] - Quote
RECON BY FIRE wrote:It does seem a little odd that it appears to be only Imperfects that support this idea. But as to whether its a good idea or not Im kinda neutral. I dont really see the point of hiding who youre fighting, but I guess it could add some mystery to the game? I just dont get it really.
Right now, corps are picking and choosing who they want to fight.
They don't pick hard fights they pick easy fights.
|
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1043
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 16:55:00 -
[17] - Quote
honestly knowing who you fight has a lot of strategic and tatical significance. This is actually and advantage for defending corps to know who and what OB fleet to expect.
If IMPS have only defending contracts to get fights then its in our advantage even more being the defender vs attacker.
People need to get over us and realize there is a bigger picture here. To much bias for our ideas because people hate us. As the say hate blinds you.
What i do care about is the meta game and trying to figure out what corp is doing what, where. Thats the best part of it. |
Kain Spero
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
907
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 17:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:______ Jason Pearson in no way represents Crux Special Tasks Group or it's members.
You have always had the best disclaimers.
|
Cyn Bruin
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
655
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 17:32:00 -
[19] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:
1. Im sure this would have nothing to do with the mere fact that you can't get corp battles due to the 'stigma' your corp has created for itself.
The bottom line is the rampant BS your crew has fed this community the past few months is the main reason no one wants anything to do with you.
2. In normal circumstances, I would bet corporations would look forward to the on-field challenge a well-organized battle would provide, which I'm sure is exactly what you guys do every time you get a battle.
1a. However, all the verbal baggage that you so freely provide afterward is going to deter corps from repeating that situation. Now you have to deal with the negative outlook the vast majority of this community has toward you.
I'm sorry but this sounds like a plea to devs to step in and fix an isolated problem that was self-created.
Howdy Cubs,
1. What "stigma" do you refer too? A few members talking smack on forums... other corps dont do this as well? Any corp battle we've had has stayed private. The outcomes aren't shared with the community unlike Betamax and SI to name a few. We keep the wins to ourselves and don't loudly trumpet them on the forums.
2. I would disagree about corps looking to find a good fight. There are only a couple of corporations that will give us a corp battle, the rest avoid us and I don't think it has anything to do with "our mouths". It has to do with the threat of losing. I'm not saying we won't be beat, we will for sure and this drives us to play harder. But I think alot of the corps in this beta dont want to lose, so they schedule matches against people they can beat (see Hellstorm).
1a. As I stated in paragraph 1, we have never posted on forums or made known to other players the results of our corp. match, so what baggage are you refering to? I don't mind the community having a negative outlook towards us, it would happen whether some in the corp. talk or not. Think about other games/MMOs you've played, has there always been disdain for the no.1 guild? There was when I played WoW, RIFT, EQ2, CoH, BF3, etc etc. whomever is on top will get hated on, it happens.
What we are asking for is not a plea to the devs, please. It is common sense. TBH I don't care anymore. Now we are going live it doesnt matter whether we get a "willing" corp battle or not. When contracts are up, if you want them, come through us, there won't be anymore "not playing".
Look forward to avoiding your HMG on the battlefield :)
|
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers
117
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 17:53:00 -
[20] - Quote
Cyn Bruin wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:
1. Im sure this would have nothing to do with the mere fact that you can't get corp battles due to the 'stigma' your corp has created for itself.
The bottom line is the rampant BS your crew has fed this community the past few months is the main reason no one wants anything to do with you.
2. In normal circumstances, I would bet corporations would look forward to the on-field challenge a well-organized battle would provide, which I'm sure is exactly what you guys do every time you get a battle.
1a. However, all the verbal baggage that you so freely provide afterward is going to deter corps from repeating that situation. Now you have to deal with the negative outlook the vast majority of this community has toward you.
I'm sorry but this sounds like a plea to devs to step in and fix an isolated problem that was self-created.
Howdy Cubs, 1. What "stigma" do you refer too? A few members talking smack on forums... other corps dont do this as well? Any corp battle we've had has stayed private. The outcomes aren't shared with the community unlike Betamax and SI to name a few. We keep the wins to ourselves and don't loudly trumpet them on the forums. 2. I would disagree about corps looking to find a good fight. There are only a couple of corporations that will give us a corp battle, the rest avoid us and I don't think it has anything to do with "our mouths". It has to do with the threat of losing. I'm not saying we won't be beat, we will for sure and this drives us to play harder. But I think alot of the corps in this beta dont want to lose, so they schedule matches against people they can beat (see Hellstorm). 1a. As I stated in paragraph 1, we have never posted on forums or made known to other players the results of our corp. match, so what baggage are you refering to? I don't mind the community having a negative outlook towards us, it would happen whether some in the corp. talk or not. Think about other games/MMOs you've played, has there always been disdain for the no.1 guild? There was when I played WoW, RIFT, EQ2, CoH, BF3, etc etc. whomever is on top will get hated on, it happens. What we are asking for is not a plea to the devs, please. It is common sense. TBH I don't care anymore. Now we are going live it doesnt matter whether we get a "willing" corp battle or not. When contracts are up, if you want them, come through us, there won't be anymore "not playing". Look forward to avoiding your HMG on the battlefield :)
you make good points, and I can agree being at the top automatically marks you in a negative fashion, whether justified or not, its just a fact.
Perhaps your issue isnt concerning the result of the battles, and could very well be attributed to the simple lack of fortitude of other corps. I would certainly hope that isnt the case, but I'm not there in these battles, nor in these corps to know what they're thinking. I'm simply making observations from those I hang around and play with (which I try to expand whenever possible), along with my personal observations from both here and in game.
The 1 thing I have learned in my time of online gaming and running a successful crew on several games for many years: It only takes 1 person associated with your crew to give everyone a black eye so to speak.
This could be the root cause of your troubles getting corp battles...
OR it could be what you have said as well. I don't run a gossip column and don't go around gathering the scoop on corp battles. I play the game, and provide input and feedback as I deem necessary to help make this game 1 I will be playing for a long time.
But at the end of the day, 1 person softspotting in a match, or flappin their gums in a public chat, or trolling here on the forums is all it will ever take for a community to blackball anyone associated with them. Just a cold hard fact of online gaming, ESPECIALLY in such a small community as this. None of us get paid to play, so regardless of the fact that you have better hand-eye coordination than your opponent, you really arent any better than him (random blueberries, tadolescents, and Canadians excluded)
In all honesty I feel sorry for many of you guys. I have played with and against the vast majority of you, and in most cases I have enjoyable experiences.. win or lose. But most of you are labeled in a negative light in this community all because of a few loose screws that truly besmirch your corporation as a whole, hence the struggle with getting corp battles.
That being said, good luck with the corp battle struggle as I really have no more thoughts on the matter.
Take care and undoubtedly see you soon! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |