DUST Search - 465,000 Sp per week

All Channels

General Discussions

465,000 Sp per week

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Thranx1231 CowTek 90	Posted - 2012.12.24 23:41:00 - [31] - Quote Tony Calif wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: I love how all these threads have to have at least 6-10 posts about CCP lying to us. You ever figure that they expect things to work the way they tried to set them up, and things just go wrong? I love how there are always posts with nothing useful to add, when someone presents the most obvious and "fair" way to solve something most of the community is discontent with. As a retired programmer there are two constants you two mentioned in passing: 1. Nothing works like it was planned. In particular when those dreaded users are involved. 2. Everything that works like it was spec'ed will be hated by everybody, including those that spec'ed it.
Deveshi WarRavens 144	Posted - 2012.12.29 08:28:00 - [32] - Quote ANY CAP ON SP RENDERS ALL BOOSTERS OBSOLETE. So can someone remind me why we would be paying for aurum? Ah, thats right there is no longer a point! What a shame, no more income for CCP, no more Dust 514, look what you did you aso*e!
Logi Bro ZionTCD Legacy Rising 836	Posted - 2012.12.29 08:32:00 - [33] - Quote Deveshi wrote: ANY CAP ON SP RENDERS ALL BOOSTERS OBSOLETE. So can someone remind me why we would be paying for aurum? Ah, thats right there is no longer a point! What a shame, no more income for CCP, no more Dust 514, look what you did you aso*e! Passive SP has no cap, so boosters are not obsolete, plus CCP will still make money from people that use AUR for in-game equipment, not just boosters.
Deveshi WarRavens 144	Posted - 2012.12.29 09:07:00 - [34] - Quote Logi Bro wrote: Deveshi wrote: ANY CAP ON SP RENDERS ALL BOOSTERS OBSOLETE. So can someone remind me why we would be paying for aurum? Ah, thats right there is no longer a point! What a shame, no more income for CCP, no more Dust 514, look what you did you aso*e! Passive SP has no cap, so boosters are not obsolete, plus CCP will still make money from people that use AUR for in-game equipment, not just boosters. So active boosters are just a con then? Something tells me you haven't thought the marketing side of this through. Aurum Equipment is intended for limited use for you to "side train" (quoted from CCP) whereas the boosters garantee CCP financial backing from a % of their clients.
Logi Bro ZionTCD Legacy Rising 836	Posted - 2012.12.29 09:10:00 - [35] - Quote Deveshi wrote: Logi Bro wrote: Deveshi wrote: ANY CAP ON SP RENDERS ALL BOOSTERS OBSOLETE. So can someone remind me why we would be paying for aurum? Ah, thats right there is no longer a point! What a shame, no more income for CCP, no more Dust 514, look what you did you asoe! Passive SP has no cap, so boosters are not obsolete, plus CCP will still make money from people that use AUR for in-game equipment, not just boosters. So active boosters are just a con then? Something tells me you haven't thought the marketing side of this through. Aurum Equipment is intended for limited use for you to "side train" (quoted from CCP) whereas the boosters garantee CCP financial backing from a % of their clients. deja DEJA vu* Just go ahead and look at the other thread for my answer.
Deveshi WarRavens 144	Posted - 2012.12.29 09:34:00 - [36] - Quote Logi Bro wrote: Deveshi wrote: Logi Bro wrote: Deveshi wrote: ANY CAP ON SP RENDERS ALL BOOSTERS OBSOLETE. So can someone remind me why we would be paying for aurum? Ah, thats right there is no longer a point! What a shame, no more income for CCP, no more Dust 514, look what you did you asoe! Passive SP has no cap, so boosters are not obsolete, plus CCP will still make money from people that use AUR for in-game equipment, not just boosters. So active boosters are just a con then? Something tells me you haven't thought the marketing side of this through. Aurum Equipment is intended for limited use for you to "side train" (quoted from CCP) whereas the boosters garantee CCP financial backing from a % of their clients. deja DEJA vu* Just go ahead and look at the other thread for my answer. Fair enough, I can concede with passive boosters. I'm still going to rant about the rest of it. And quit pointing out the Deja vu! If I continue CCP might actually read the complaints about the game for a change rather than just posting about forum trolls. Have you looked at the dev posts lately? 80% are about forum trolls rather than dealing with the issues and suggestions of the game!
Anyanka Shadowmane Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic 80	Posted - 2012.12.29 10:42:00 - [37] - Quote Deveshi wrote: Fair enough, I can concede with passive boosters. I'm still going to rant about the rest of it. And quit pointing out the Deja vu! If I continue CCP might actually read the complaints about the game for a change rather than just posting about forum trolls. Have you looked at the dev posts lately? 80% are about forum trolls rather than dealing with the issues and suggestions of the game! Active boosters let you hit the cap in less time. If you have the free time to be able to play enough to hit the cap, they are not so useful, if you don't have that time, they're great. It also appears, from what HowDidThatTaste has posted towards the beginning of this thread, that using active boosters raises your cap slightly, so that you can earn more SP than someone who isn't using the boosters. (I don't like this, but that's the way it is). I agree with Tony Calif that Tony Calif wrote: Rolling universal SP cap is the best solution. However, I know that there is at least one player out there that doesn't think that new players should every be able to catch up with the older players.
Cyn Bruin Imperfects Negative-Feedback 651	Posted - 2012.12.29 17:47:00 - [38] - Quote Alot of these ideas have been posted numerous times and CCP doesnt comment. It would be great if they would have an open discourse about this core system. This SP system is one of the main things that separates this game from other FPS shooters (you can invent your character from scratch with SP). So having a good dialogue with CCP and the beta testers on what would keep people around is huge. CCP has hinted they have a whole new SP system in the works and we will love it. How about letting the testers know what this idea is considering the next wipe we will be going open beta. If the testers hate your SP system CCP, how do you think the players that are attracted to open beta are going to react to it? First impressions in a game are everything. Please open up the dialogue and your mindset on the SP system CCP.
Noc Tempre Imperfects Negative-Feedback 1170	Posted - 2012.12.29 18:47:00 - [39] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: I love how all these threads have to have at least 6-10 posts about CCP lying to us. You ever figure that they expect things to work the way they tried to set them up, and things just go wrong? You are ignoring the fact that when we pointed out the daily SP system was not working, CCP "checked" and came back to tell us it actually was. It's not the bugs, it's the denial of bugs that is lying.


Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.