|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vermaak Kuvakei
Doomheim
89
   |
Posted - 2012.12.15 17:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Investment protection:
In my opinion the main crew of the dropship and lav (pilot/gunner, possibly the lav passenger) shouldn't be able to get shot out of the vehicles, the vehicles should have to be destroyed or they should have to jump out of it to be killed. I'm against this applying to the militia and starter because that would just cause more starter lav spam. It also shouldn't apply to the dropship passengers because they're already protected by the doors and it would give people more of a reason to stay in dropships all day. For the lav, I'm a bit indecisive on passenger protection.
Slight combat utility:
I think that drivers should get a bit of personal defense. As a module I think that mounted, driver controlled weapons that perform sub par to the light weapon they fill the role of for the same level (standard rocket pods weaker than swarm launchers but not by much). It would make drivers a bit more self reliant but not to the point where a gunner is an after thought. The only weapons I can think to model this off of are the swarm launcher, assault rifle, hmg, and laser rifle.
Logistic vehicle alteration:
The lav needs to receive a special reduction for the pg/cpu requirements of heavy repairers to the point where they take up the pg/cpu of the regular repairers, it's inexcusable for the logistics lavs not to be the most powerful repairer. The logistics dropshi needs a pg/cpu buff along with the removal of the built in mcru, non militia mcrus, another high slot added to both dropships and reduced mcru pg/cpu needs |
Vermaak Kuvakei
Doomheim
89
|
Posted - 2012.12.15 17:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
So basically you're saying everyone should be able to be shot out of there vehicles including people (including me) with million ISK tanks
Again, that's like saying tank drivers shouldn't be able to use there own guns |
Vermaak Kuvakei
Doomheim
89
|
Posted - 2012.12.15 17:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
You didn't say that but you implied it by saying lav drivers/ gunners for both should stay exposed. They should require actual Av to take down.
I could live without the gun but it's common sense that all pilots should have a form of self defense that for balance purposes is weaker than equal meta weapons as since they'll be the ones driving, they know exactly where to aim and where enemy fire is coming from
|
Vermaak Kuvakei
Doomheim
89
|
Posted - 2012.12.16 02:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
I still don't see how either of the first two could be a bad thing |
Vermaak Kuvakei
Doomheim
89
|
Posted - 2012.12.16 18:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Lighting a Cyno... |
Vermaak Kuvakei
Doomheim
89
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 13:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
So no one agrees that logis should have the strongest repair capabilities? |
Vermaak Kuvakei
Doomheim
89
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 15:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
I'd perfer protection over shooting for the passenger but what do you think of a protected gunner?
This would most likely draw away from everyone using them as OHK batteries, given the safety of firing at a range than possibly running into an Av nade
At least someone can agree with me on that |
Vermaak Kuvakei
Doomheim
89
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
I find that having to take out the vehicle to get the lav or dropship gunner(only for standard and up transport gunners) |
Vermaak Kuvakei
Doomheim
89
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 00:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bump |
|
|
| |
|