DUST Search - Post Tourney Corp Power Rankings

SATORI CORUSCANTi wrote:

Tectonious Falcon wrote:

SATORI CORUSCANTi wrote:

So you'll judge a corp based on the ground game(or lack thereof) of their tank drivers? okay

No I'm saying players like that can bring a corp down, and that if there are players like that in Betamax, the corp wouldn't be rated somewhere in the top 5. Like I said they have some great players like Jenza, but if you have players like that, it would affect the overall ranking of the corp.

Also, I'm not sure if you know what your talking about. Heaps of people have been judging corps based on tanks. I've seen people in many threads saying that SI, STB and other corps aren't that good, because they run in tanks. Hell I've even seen a thread telling ROFL House that they suck.

I'm not saying Betamax sucks, I'm saying if this is an overall assessment of a corp, then having people like that in a corp would have to bring down their ranking.

Edit: I drive a gunnlogi and a madrugar and someday I'll get around to a sagaris (I waste my sp) so I'm not saying tanks are for scrubs.

I can see what you're saying, but I still think thinking less of a corp because their tank driver got in a tank is a bit unfair. I'm just assuming he was a dedicated tank driver, though. There's that stigma towards calling in vehicles in pub matches and all, and I get mad at it too, but I mean they trained into that after all lol.

I've also seen the posts judging corps based on their tanks. I don't agree with those just as much :D For the most part they've just been uninformed opinions, as you can see from everyone's different reasons for their rankings.

I'm sorry, I guess it's just the nature of this thread.. it's just a lose-lose kind of thing. These "overall rankings" are laughable at best, Imperfects are the only ones who have proven anything.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Tectonious Falcon The Southern Legion 395	Posted - 2012.12.05 08:33:00 - [1] - Quote Looks like most of you have forgotten about The Southern Legion huh? We have some pretty good players too :P
Tectonious Falcon The Southern Legion 395	Posted - 2012.12.06 07:25:00 - [2] - Quote I'm sorry to say this, but I wouldn't rate Betamax that high. Sure they have some good players, but they have lots of bad players as well. As an example this is what happened today I was in a pub match of ambush, with 1 random, and the only opposing player had rage quit. This guy and I were driving around in LAV's, because what else were we meant to do, when all of a sudden a full squad of Betamax guys joined the game. I thought "this will be fun, I can finally see how good by gun game is compared to some good players." I was dead wrong though. Even though they had us outnumbered, it was a pub match and they were working as a team, they decided it was necessary to call in a tank. It stuff like this that makes me dislike corps, and while I know they have some good players, I have seen this happen multiple times. I'm not claiming we're better than them, but if you can't play ambush on the ground while you have higher numbers, you don't deserve to be rated incredibly highly. Ps. I can understand calling in a tank every now and then- sometimes I do it just to get my corpmates, but they weren't playing against anyone from Betamax.
Tectonious Falcon The Southern Legion 395	Posted - 2012.12.06 07:57:00 - [3] - Quote SATORI CORUSCANTi wrote: So you'll judge a corp based on the ground game(or lack thereof) of their tank drivers? okay No I'm saying players like that can bring a corp down, and that if there are players like that in Betamax, the corp wouldn't be rated somewhere in the top 5. Like I said they have some great players like Jenza, but if you have players like that, it would affect the overall ranking of the corp. Also, I'm not sure if you know what your talking about. Heaps of people have been judging corps based on tanks. I've seen people in many threads saying that SI, STB and other corps aren't that good, because they run in tanks. Hell I've even seen a thread telling ROFL House that they suck. I'm not saying Betamax sucks, I'm saying if this is an overall assessment of a corp, then having people like that in a corp would have to bring down their ranking. Edit: I drive a gunnlogi and a madrugar and someday I'll get around to a sagaris (I waste my sp) so I'm not saying tanks are for scrubs.
Tectonious Falcon The Southern Legion 395	Posted - 2012.12.06 08:22:00 - [4] - Quote SATORI CORUSCANTi wrote: Tectonious Falcon wrote: SATORI CORUSCANTi wrote: So you'll judge a corp based on the ground game(or lack thereof) of their tank drivers? okay No I'm saying players like that can bring a corp down, and that if there are players like that in Betamax, the corp wouldn't be rated somewhere in the top 5. Like I said they have some great players like Jenza, but if you have players like that, it would affect the overall ranking of the corp. Also, I'm not sure if you know what your talking about. Heaps of people have been judging corps based on tanks. I've seen people in many threads saying that SI, STB and other corps aren't that good, because they run in tanks. Hell I've even seen a thread telling ROFL House that they suck. I'm not saying Betamax sucks, I'm saying if this is an overall assessment of a corp, then having people like that in a corp would have to bring down their ranking. Edit: I drive a gunnlogi and a madrugar and someday I'll get around to a sagaris (I waste my sp) so I'm not saying tanks are for scrubs. I can see what you're saying, but I still think thinking less of a corp because their tank driver got in a tank is a bit unfair. I'm just assuming he was a dedicated tank driver, though. There's that stigma towards calling in vehicles in pub matches and all, and I get mad at it too, but I mean they trained into that after all lol. I've also seen the posts judging corps based on their tanks. I don't agree with those just as much :D For the most part they've just been uninformed opinions, as you can see from everyone's different reasons for their rankings. I'm sorry, I guess it's just the nature of this thread.. it's just a lose-lose kind of thing. These "overall rankings" are laughable at best, Imperfects are the only ones who have proven anything. Yes I can see what your saying as well. Anyway, we won't be able to tell how good a corp actually is until we can field more players per side, as that is when you will need a larger group of active players, as well as better tactics and strategies.