|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ima Leet
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
321
   |
Posted - 2012.11.07 01:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
there was a build where you would not start a battle until both teams were full.
currently matches start as long as there is one person queuing up.
i'm asking that you not start battles until there is at least half a team on each side
this should prevent games that people join where its 80-80 and 00:00 time left
heck, i'd even bet it'd help server load since it wont be creating so many empty battles!
thanks |
Ima Leet
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
321
|
Posted - 2012.11.07 01:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
DJINN Riot wrote:Ima Leet wrote:i'm asking that you not start battles until there is at least half a team on each side I second. Id take waiting in the lobby until a match filled up.
ty, +1.
i dont think they need to wait until the match is Full but at least half. i can remember it was a bit painful waiting til the whole game filled up before it would start. |
Ima Leet
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
321
|
Posted - 2012.11.07 21:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
From Costa Rica wrote:So, yep way for at least 6 vs 6
i think it would definitely help stop empty games from starting :) |
Ima Leet
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
321
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 16:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ten-Sidhe wrote:I like the partial teams to start, 6vs6 sounds good.
it seems to be getting worse now. almost constantly joining a game that is empty and has like 5 minutes or less left in the game... makes for a crappy SP/ISK game |
Ima Leet
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
321
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 20:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Reimus Klinsman wrote:Do you rememeber when we had to wait until the teams were full. Games would take 30 minutes to start. The forums were flooded with complaints. Things are okay as they are. Just stop adding people to matches that are 30-50% complete. That will shift them to the battles that have few players. Bam, two bugs fixed with one change.
yes, this is why i said to wait to start the matches at half capacity, not waiting until full teams, because yes, the wait was sometimes unbearable. but waiting til half full should not be too much time consuming.
Maken Tosch wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Cross Atu wrote:I'd also like to add that once a match starts it should be locked so no new players are added. The amount of time wasted by being dropped into matches where the outcome is essentially decided (or where the match is outright ending) is maddening. I don't think matches should be locked straight away. I think that, once a 50% mark on any objective is reached, the match should go into lockdown and prevent new arrivals. Either MCC loses shields, either team drops below 50% clone count, or the mission timer runs down to halfway. This. However, if you follow this thread posted by CCP Cmdr Wang, you will see that they are hinting at the possibility of enabling us to queue up to the next starting match. This might help. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=381213#post381213
yes, i can see where it would be useful to block people from joining a game that was just about over, its pointless to throw people in these types of matches. |
|
|
| |
|