Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
742
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 12:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Currently, I think SI and Imperfects are strong contenders
TheReaper852 wrote:Ops Fox wrote:Why what's there stats? There is something called leaderboards in game. You should check them out.
Icy Tiger wrote:I know some corps that have no chance of winning... if you're not in the top 50 on any of the leaderboards, don't bother showing up.
Don't base anything off of the leaderboards. The reason some of them are in the top 20 is because of their numbers. Don't get me wrong, They've got some great played in every corp, just the leaderboards show total scores, not how good they are. I mean, my corp consists of 6 members, 4 actually play quite a bit (myself included) and we can do just aswell compared to other corps, if they had 4 players :P |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
742
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 13:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Currently, I think SI and Imperfects are strong contenders TheReaper852 wrote:Ops Fox wrote:Why what's there stats? There is something called leaderboards in game. You should check them out. Icy Tiger wrote:I know some corps that have no chance of winning... if you're not in the top 50 on any of the leaderboards, don't bother showing up. Don't base anything off of the leaderboards. The reason some of them are in the top 20 is because of their numbers. Don't get me wrong, They've got some great played in every corp, just the leaderboards show total scores, not how good they are. I mean, my corp consists of 6 members, 4 actually play quite a bit (myself included) and we can do just aswell compared to other corps, if they had 4 players :P ur stats like kd usually take a hit the more ppl u get in because not everyone will be meeting corp avg kd tbh i dont base anything off leaderboards but seeing as Imperfects is a combination of Imperfects/Global Conflict/Hetairoi. then id say they are hands down the favourites to win based on their members.
Aye, I understand that heh, just dislike it when people are like "IF YOU'RE NOT IN THE TOP 50 YOU'RE NOT GOOD" kind of thing going, which is just bad. I mean, when you're playing a game and you check the scoreboard for other players, if I see Imperfects or SI then it's like "Oh ****, they're on the other side" or "Right, well this game is going to be over pretty quickly" but the other top 50? I've never thought any of them are any good, just a lot of players with an average score, nothing special. |