|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Regis Mark V
91
   |
Posted - 2012.10.20 23:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
slap26 wrote:Don't worry the game will survive as a PC port :)
Good luck with Planetside 2 on PC |
Regis Mark V
91
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 23:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:"NOBODY wants a game that simply makes you better just because you play it more"
you're high.
that's exactly what happens: you play more, you get better. the game rewards you with unlocking better gear, you play more, you get better.
what you want is "montessori video gaming" = everyone comes in first because the devs do a bunch of handholding to protect you from the facts that you are finding out right now. you weren't as good as you thought you were and now this game proves it to you because better players own you and you blame the game.
typical.
Peace
B
That's the problem it's completely devoid of skill. It's whoever has the better gear wins not who is the better player. |
Regis Mark V
91
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 23:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
PDIGGY22 wrote:Regis Mark V wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:"NOBODY wants a game that simply makes you better just because you play it more"
you're high.
that's exactly what happens: you play more, you get better. the game rewards you with unlocking better gear, you play more, you get better.
what you want is "montessori video gaming" = everyone comes in first because the devs do a bunch of handholding to protect you from the facts that you are finding out right now. you weren't as good as you thought you were and now this game proves it to you because better players own you and you blame the game.
typical.
Peace
B That's the problem it's completely devoid of skill. It's whoever has the better gear wins not who is the better player. yea, knowing the game/maps/modes ect is a huge enough advantage in every other game and too throw more advantages on top of that is crazy.
Yeah this game isn't you play more you get better. It's you play more get better gear which makes you better. |
Regis Mark V
91
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 00:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
Maps are too big, 16 vs 16 for this games idea is too small
You just said it and contradicted yourself right there.The maps aren't too big,it's that the squads are too small. Seems like there's a new thing to QQ about every single week. First it's the AR's are OP,then it's the strafe speed,now it's that the maps are too big. Always something with you people.
Maps are to big for 16 v 16 increasing squad cap wont make the maps smaller. Only player count can do that. |
Regis Mark V
91
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 01:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
Th3rdSun wrote:Regis Mark V wrote:Th3rdSun wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:
Maps are too big, 16 vs 16 for this games idea is too small
You just said it and contradicted yourself right there.The maps aren't too big,it's that the squads are too small. Seems like there's a new thing to QQ about every single week. First it's the AR's are OP,then it's the strafe speed,now it's that the maps are too big. Always something with you people. Maps are to big for 16 v 16 increasing squad cap wont make the maps smaller. Only player count can do that. But if the player count on a said "too big" map were increased by say 2x,then all of that open space wouldn't seem like such a big deal.I bet if it were 16 vs 16 on a MAG domo map,that would seem too big too,wouldn't it?see how that works? Man,I thought I'd never see the day that anyone was actually complaining about a map in a shooter being too big. 
Big maps and low player count doesn't mix well at all. Why do you think bf3 players on console constantly ask for player count increase? |
|
|
| |
|