|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Avenger 245
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
477
   |
Posted - 2012.10.13 20:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
i think the MTAC should be a small compact walker. with less armor than a tank but more than a LAV, and 1 medium turret, i dont want a super mech that stomps around destroying everything out in the open i want a small compact warmachine design to bring some of the firepower of tank along with much greater mobility, something to walk the more urban enviorments quicker turn speed than eitehr the LAV or the HAV but slower at flat out speed, but fairly tough since its expected to get upclose and personal with the AV gear. |
Avenger 245
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 20:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
tanks should execl at blasting away ground vehicles and overwhelming defended positions. the MTAC should excel at providing infantry support, fast enough to not be left in teh dust but with plenty of mobility to go where they go most of the time, hills and such shouldnt be a problem for the MTAC but yeah th MTAC should be designed around infantry support and should loose to tanks |
Avenger 245
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 22:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
i see it as being more useful a small walking vehicle more used as infantry support more HP than the LAV, but unable to take on tanks directly, more mobile than the LAV or HAV. the arm igrabbing punching arm idea kinda pointless why grab a vehicle when you could shoot it? also if its big enough to grab and hold a tank then its to big to be mobile enough to support infantry. no need to have to brace yourself to fire most engineers are smart enough to build machines within their specs however it could slow down when firing powerful weapons.
the MTAC should be realistic in terms of uses and design, form follows function, we need a light wight mobile, infantry support vehicle that can work efficently in cluttered and combat enviorments. that is its function so being short enough not to clip its self on every overhang or walkway is important, having a medium sized gun to provide proper infantry support is need, being able to turn quickly becuase rarly does a enemy charge you head on is a requiremnt as well, not to mention the MTAC doesnt need to be fast just able to keep up with heavies. keeping those 4 things in mind is how CCP should make the MTAC. |
Avenger 245
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.14 00:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
All the MTAC needs to do is fill the criteria for mobile enough to stay with infantry normally, fast enough to keep up with a heavy be able to provide firepower and support for infantry . Weather it has 2 small turrets or one medium turret is up to CCP but there is a lot a heavy could do that a MTAC couldnt |
Avenger 245
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
477
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 01:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
I dont support the above trolling
Wow valen how you put that is amazing CCP should defintly do it like that
|
|
|
| |
|