|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shijima Kuraimaru
WarRavens
168
   |
Posted - 2012.11.01 19:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
SOLID DOGG wrote:Since Killzone 3, we all know you don't release game trailers/screenshots with amazing graphics and not live up to those expectations. Killzone 3 did a great job, and that was 2009.
If CCP wasn't releasing trailers with tons of **** on screen and great graphics, I would say ok. But they are, and that tells me that they're going for both. It's 2012, PS3 is basically EOL. Push the system to the limits, hell the systems are 250gb now, give me a 40gb download if you have to.
I do feel sorry for anyone with a sub par internet connection...my suggestion is to go wired, nice and tight.
Gameplay is equal with graphics. Both should be great!
The 250GB is not memory. It's only storage space on the hard drive. The current PS3 CPU/GPU/VRAM/RAM specs as follows.
CPU speed 3.2 GHz
CPU cores 7
GPU speed 550 MHz
Video 256MB GDDR3 VRAM
System 256MB XDR Main RAM
Also consider the data transfer rate of the hard drive. The more there is to load, the longer it will take to load. And considering that CCP only has 256MB of dedicated video, and 256MB shared memory, they're doing pretty good. The default hard drive is usually 5400 RPM. To cut down loading time get a 7200 RPM or solid state hard drive. Just make sure it's a laptop/notebook hard drive 9.5mm thick or it won't fit the hard drive cradle.
Or, perhaps I misunderstood your implication. In which case, this might just be a useful information post. |
Shijima Kuraimaru
WarRavens
168
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 22:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Thurak Mirunas wrote:I like how people are saying that its 2012 as if that's a reason a PS3 game should have higher detail, remember PS3 is 6 year old hardware now, only difference is newer ones have more hard drive space and are smaller, which don't help for making a game run any better
I wonder if my lack of some of these issues I read about is because I have the first release model with all the original hard/firm ware. Well it's original except where I've changed out the 40GB HDD with a 160GB HDD. |
Shijima Kuraimaru
WarRavens
168
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 23:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jak Teston wrote:I'd accept a reduction of 50% in poly-count and texture resolution if it increased the framerate by 10%, honestly.
Imagine trying to be competitive at Counterstrike while running at 30 fps. You'd might as well send the mouse-input by mail at that rate.
30 FPS (.03 Seconds per frame) isn't bad when one considers that the average human perception + reaction time is .2 to .25 of a second Trained professional fighters, and others professionals, who rely on perception + reaction speeds have been known to get that down to as little as .16 seconds. |
Shijima Kuraimaru
WarRavens
168
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 21:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
SOLID DOGG wrote:Shijima Kuraimaru wrote:SOLID DOGG wrote:Since Killzone 3, we all know you don't release game trailers/screenshots with amazing graphics and not live up to those expectations. Killzone 3 did a great job, and that was 2009.
If CCP wasn't releasing trailers with tons of **** on screen and great graphics, I would say ok. But they are, and that tells me that they're going for both. It's 2012, PS3 is basically EOL. Push the system to the limits, hell the systems are 250gb now, give me a 40gb download if you have to.
I do feel sorry for anyone with a sub par internet connection...my suggestion is to go wired, nice and tight.
Gameplay is equal with graphics. Both should be great! The 250GB is not memory. It's only storage space on the hard drive. The current PS3 CPU/GPU/VRAM/RAM specs as follows. CPU speed 3.2 GHz CPU cores 7 GPU speed 550 MHz Video 256MB GDDR3 VRAM System 256MB XDR Main RAM Also consider the data transfer rate of the hard drive. The more there is to load, the longer it will take to load. And considering that CCP only has 256MB of dedicated video, and 256MB shared memory, they're doing pretty good. The default hard drive is usually 5400 RPM. To cut down loading time get a 7200 RPM or solid state hard drive. Just make sure it's a laptop/notebook hard drive 9.5mm thick or it won't fit the hard drive cradle. Or, perhaps I misunderstood your implication. In which case, this might just be a useful information post. Yes, you misinterpreted. I'm saying if CCP needs to make a huge file size for us to download to have somewhat of an equilibrium, who cares because there's a TON more HD storage space than on my old 80gb PS3.
My apologies. But a bigger HDD isn't a reason to by a new PS3. It's easy enough to change out a HDD on one's existing system. The instructions are in the manual and on the Sony website. |
|
|
| |
|