DUST Search - Change the rate of MCC damage back to the last build

All Channels

General Discussions

Change the rate of MCC damage back to the last build

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
WhatszGudDawg ZionTCD Legacy Rising 48	Posted - 2012.10.07 21:20:00 - [1] - Quote Has anyone else noticed how Skirmish matches are taking a lot longer than before? The increased time that you have to regain null cannons is making gameplay sloppy. Players are acting too relaxed and in a few minutes, the whole map could be under enemy control! It's becoming a long, dragged out, constant power struggle that usually last for about 5-10 minutes longer than the other build's Skirmishes. I understand that the point of Skirmish is to fight for control, but matches are taking way too long, and ruining how effectively a team operates. because we have so much time, defending a point is becoming a game of I hold it, then you hold it. Is it bad that we have more of a chance to save ourselves from defeat? No but it's unnessasary to have a game go on for so long.
Tyrius Madison 97	Posted - 2012.10.07 21:22:00 - [2] - Quote I'ma have to respectfully disagree with this. I don't think the matches are too long at all. It's supposed to be a long, dragged out, constant power struggle. Ambush is the quick match.
Yagihige Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 177	Posted - 2012.10.07 21:26:00 - [3] - Quote I vehemently disagree. This gamemode should be this long. This is a mode about territory control and that should take time. I also like how it works now and it can be really dynamic with objectives changing hands.
Baal Roo Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 810	Posted - 2012.10.07 21:48:00 - [4] - Quote With how extraordinarily slow the gameplay is now, if anything, the matches should be LONGER rather than shorter. The matches as they are generally end so quickly players have little choice but to spawn and rush constantly or risk getting too far into the hole on damage to properly recover.
Icy Tiger 63	Posted - 2012.10.07 21:52:00 - [5] - Quote No matches are good now.
SYST3M 0V3RL0AD Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 209	Posted - 2012.10.07 22:54:00 - [6] - Quote I am happy with the duration, but i do think the clone counts should be slightly raised on Skirmish matches. The amount of games that end in depleted clones is far too high in my opinion. I do respect the concept of running out of clones from poor strategy before the match ends, i just think it happens far too frequently is all. I like to battle for the objectives for the duration of the battle. I hate losing because dense blue dots enjoy jumping out of the MCC far more than they enjoy winning a battle.
Tony Calif Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 2002	Posted - 2012.10.07 23:00:00 - [7] - Quote My problem with the increased time is that it means increased deaths or slowed down pace of the game. Basically, for a fast & frantic game, we need more ISK. I don't mind the extra time, but I need my ISK for suits for that extra time.
SYST3M 0V3RL0AD Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 209	Posted - 2012.10.07 23:25:00 - [8] - Quote Tony Calif wrote: My problem with the increased time is that it means increased deaths or slowed down pace of the game. Basically, for a fast & frantic game, we need more ISK. I don't mind the extra time, but I need my ISK for suits for that extra time. I absolutely agree with you. Though, more ISK to replace suits may make people far more reckless and not be afraid of dying. Maybe CCP is trying to stress teamwork and smart play? I'm not sure. But it definitely has slowed the pace. Once a team is down by clones or MCC damage they tend to play cautious and just ride out the loss to save their fittings or they switch to running militia fits which will likely just lead to more deaths on their part anyway. It's a tough call. I think slightly more ISK would be benefical, but a drastic increase would be counter productive to teamwork.
TiMeSpLiT--TeR Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 326	Posted - 2012.10.08 00:15:00 - [9] - Quote It should be longer. I heard EVE battles are much much longer than this.
Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming 2283	Posted - 2012.10.08 01:01:00 - [10] - Quote TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote: It should be longer. I heard EVE battles are much much longer than this. this isnt EVE and the planetary conquest mode will be longer than skirmish

Super Cargo Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 428	Posted - 2012.10.08 01:05:00 - [11] - Quote Tyrius Madison wrote: I'ma have to respectfully disagree with this. I don't think the matches are too long at all. It's supposed to be a long, dragged out, constant power struggle. Ambush is the quick match. quoted for agreement. qfa
TiMeSpLiT--TeR Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 326	Posted - 2012.10.08 01:11:00 - [12] - Quote Mavado V Noriega wrote: TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote: It should be longer. I heard EVE battles are much much longer than this. this isnt EVE and the planetary conquest mode will be longer than skirmish I know it's not but EVE players are also associated when conquering a planet with Dust players.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.