| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
WhatszGudDawg
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
48
   |
Posted - 2012.10.07 21:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Has anyone else noticed how Skirmish matches are taking a lot longer than before? The increased time that you have to regain null cannons is making gameplay sloppy. Players are acting too relaxed and in a few minutes, the whole map could be under enemy control! It's becoming a long, dragged out, constant power struggle that usually last for about 5-10 minutes longer than the other build's Skirmishes. I understand that the point of Skirmish is to fight for control, but matches are taking way too long, and ruining how effectively a team operates. because we have so much time, defending a point is becoming a game of I hold it, then you hold it. Is it bad that we have more of a chance to save ourselves from defeat? No but it's unnessasary to have a game go on for so long. |
Tyrius Madison
97
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 21:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'ma have to respectfully disagree with this.
I don't think the matches are too long at all.
It's supposed to be a long, dragged out, constant power struggle. Ambush is the quick match. |
Yagihige
Crux Special Tasks Group
Gallente Federation
177
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 21:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
I vehemently disagree. This gamemode should be this long. This is a mode about territory control and that should take time. I also like how it works now and it can be really dynamic with objectives changing hands. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
810
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 21:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
With how extraordinarily slow the gameplay is now, if anything, the matches should be LONGER rather than shorter.
The matches as they are generally end so quickly players have little choice but to spawn and rush constantly or risk getting too far into the hole on damage to properly recover. |
Icy Tiger
63
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 21:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
No matches are good now. |
SYST3M 0V3RL0AD
Zumari Force Projection
Caldari State
209
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 22:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
I am happy with the duration, but i do think the clone counts should be slightly raised on Skirmish matches. The amount of games that end in depleted clones is far too high in my opinion. I do respect the concept of running out of clones from poor strategy before the match ends, i just think it happens far too frequently is all. I like to battle for the objectives for the duration of the battle. I hate losing because dense blue dots enjoy jumping out of the MCC far more than they enjoy winning a battle. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 23:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
My problem with the increased time is that it means increased deaths or slowed down pace of the game. Basically, for a fast & frantic game, we need more ISK. I don't mind the extra time, but I need my ISK for suits for that extra time. |
SYST3M 0V3RL0AD
Zumari Force Projection
Caldari State
209
|
Posted - 2012.10.07 23:25:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:My problem with the increased time is that it means increased deaths or slowed down pace of the game. Basically, for a fast & frantic game, we need more ISK. I don't mind the extra time, but I need my ISK for suits for that extra time.
I absolutely agree with you. Though, more ISK to replace suits may make people far more reckless and not be afraid of dying. Maybe CCP is trying to stress teamwork and smart play? I'm not sure. But it definitely has slowed the pace. Once a team is down by clones or MCC damage they tend to play cautious and just ride out the loss to save their fittings or they switch to running militia fits which will likely just lead to more deaths on their part anyway. It's a tough call. I think slightly more ISK would be benefical, but a drastic increase would be counter productive to teamwork. |
TiMeSpLiT--TeR
Planetary Response Organisation
Test Friends Please Ignore
326
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 00:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
It should be longer. I heard EVE battles are much much longer than this. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 01:01:00 -
[10] - Quote
TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:It should be longer. I heard EVE battles are much much longer than this.
this isnt EVE
and the planetary conquest mode will be longer than skirmish |
|
|
Super Cargo
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
428
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 01:05:00 -
[11] - Quote
Tyrius Madison wrote:I'ma have to respectfully disagree with this.
I don't think the matches are too long at all.
It's supposed to be a long, dragged out, constant power struggle. Ambush is the quick match.
quoted for agreement. qfa |
TiMeSpLiT--TeR
Planetary Response Organisation
Test Friends Please Ignore
326
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 01:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:It should be longer. I heard EVE battles are much much longer than this. this isnt EVE and the planetary conquest mode will be longer than skirmish
I know it's not but EVE players are also associated when conquering a planet with Dust players. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |