|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
1155
   |
Posted - 2012.10.05 12:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:Still use milita gear to kill proto stuff
Skill>gear
farming SP > skill > gear.
Or spawn sniping > playing the game.
And you know that quite well dont you ? |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
1155
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 12:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:Still use milita gear to kill proto stuff
Skill>gear
farming SP > skill > gear. Or spawn sniping > playing the game. And you know that quite well dont you ? Instead of crying about it why dont you post ideas how to fix it in the feedback thread like a good beta tester does? oh sorry your just here to play the game
Lol, seems that i know you quite well but the opposite isnt true.
And i'm confident CCP will solve this as they have various solutions in mind already. In fact, if you were really that much of a beta tester and hanged out on IRC with the devs like i do, you would know it.
Guess you don't. Exploiting is so much fun right ? Oh yeah, blame CCP right ? |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
1155
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 12:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:I dont bother with the IRC
IRC causes more problems than it fixes them, i even made a thread about 'why the IRC?' and it was all posted in ther
I actually choose to use the officaial forums not a 3rd party biased chatroom
Being on IRC is not absolutely needed. And i'm not suggesting that not being on IRC makes you less important.
I was just answering to you blaming me for criticizing exploit users instead of offering solutions, wich was false. That's it.
Now, i see you decided then to create an uber-feedback thread. Guess my intervention had some good in it then. |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
1155
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 13:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:Rorek IronBlood wrote:
Yeah. I remember that thread, and I agreed with it. Personally I have said this before, but the IRC is a glorified twitter feed. I would love to see CCP be more mindful and interactive in the sense that they post more information here properly. Even starting a thread once a week to see how people feel and what issues should be looked into.
+1
Don't you guys think that we get to give suggestions to devs every 10 minutes.. Those guys work.
Its main use is that it offers a chance to debate in live with different people from the beta. And often i ends up with a thread on official forums.
Also, one of the main reason why people use IRC is to try and get fresh news more often to feed to the forums.
Stop thinking IRC dudes thinks they're better than you. I know i'm not. |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
1155
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 13:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
EnglishSnake wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:EnglishSnake wrote:I dont bother with the IRC
IRC causes more problems than it fixes them, i even made a thread about 'why the IRC?' and it was all posted in ther
I actually choose to use the officaial forums not a 3rd party biased chatroom Being on IRC is not absolutely needed. And i'm not suggesting that not being on IRC makes you less important. I was just answering to you blaming me for criticizing exploit users instead of offering solutions, wich was false. That's it. Now, i see you decided then to create an uber-feedback thread. Guess my intervention had some good in it then. I was planning to do it anyways Im a beta tester not just a complain about and do **** all to help solve the problem player
Well, nice to talk with you. Next time, try and get the ironic tone... |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
1155
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 14:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:IRC has been rather vacant due to them being on vacation. So far they told us they know about the problems involving corps, fittings and squad stability. They haven't done any QnAs lately.
All I do know the reduced strafing was part of the new infantry mobility model which gives everyone more reliable mass and velocity, thus no more prancing around like a feather. Its also why there is infantry collision now and if you slam into each other hard enough you actually cause damage.
well, then the new infantry mobility model is poorly named. New model of infantry lameability seems more correct. |
|
|
| |
|