| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
   |
Posted - 2012.10.05 02:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP needs to remove showing who the opponent who accepted a contract is.
reason i say this is because it will end up where the really good teams wont be gettin much gudfites as teams will see they accepted a contract and purposely avoid fighting them because they dont wanna lose or risk losing.
Its happened in socom 4 where high rated teams would challenge peeps and get rejected.
Good teams imo shouldnt be punished because others see a name and refuse to fight.
Collateral is a good idea, makes sure a team loses something for losing and also no showing, imo id bump that up a notch tbh. 1mill currently is cheap 1 player could pay that easy, hoping their will be bigger contracts worth alot more.
So yea teams shouldnt see who accepted a contract till AFTER they paid the collateral and accepted it.
PS: can someone explain the time on the current contracts? is that EVE time? if so where can i translate to EST time? |
YoUnGcUz
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
67
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 02:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Good idea i remember in socom4 if u had over 1800+ rating no wars for you. |
RolyatDerTeufel
D3ath D3alers
RISE of LEGION
1648
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 02:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
We need EVE time clock on HUD in MQ.
I agree. We should be able to see the corp we're facing just the faction. Corp will be seen when you start the battle and collateral has been paid to defend. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
2002
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 02:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Didn't someone say somewhere that we're fighting over installations ect? That seems like collateral to me... Sure, super clan A turns up to destroy all in an empty district, no-one will bother to defend.
I don't know, I don't know enough about FW will work. But I do know if we're fighting over assets, people should try to protect them. Unless it's not economical in time/ISK.
I'll stay sat on the fence |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 03:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:Didn't someone say somewhere that we're fighting over installations ect? That seems like collateral to me... Sure, super clan A turns up to destroy all in an empty district, no-one will bother to defend.
I don't know, I don't know enough about FW will work. But I do know if we're fighting over assets, people should try to protect them. Unless it's not economical in time/ISK.
I'll stay sat on the fence
seeing as we are mercs and dont have to stay loyal to one faction what point is there to have some sort of reason to show up and defend a space when tomorrow u might be taking a contract to attack the faction u were defending yesterday
@youngcuz that is very true. my clan had a 1700+ rating on socom and teams would decline alot
if ppl can see who it is they are facing they wont wanna risk a loss and loss of expensive gear when they not tied down to 1 faction so 0 incentive to really fight for say Gallente cause |
Roy Ventus
Foxhound Corporation
172
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 03:43:00 -
[6] - Quote
I actually agree o-o. I haven't had a corps battle yet with my corporation but it makes sense right? |
Nstomper
Th3-ReSiStAnCe-SEC.0
205
|
Posted - 2012.10.05 03:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Fully agree |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |