|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
crazy space
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
879
   |
Posted - 2012.09.24 22:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
You've seen the high Poly models right? They are top of industy examples of stunning art. Just look at polycount or zbrush central or Google dust weapons.
The question is, do you want dust to be a 8 gb download while in beta ? It might even be bigger. Just be glad you only have to download 3 gb for now. |
crazy space
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 00:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ieukoplast wrote:crazy space wrote:You've seen the high Poly models right? They are top of industy examples of stunning art. Just look at polycount or zbrush central or Google dust weapons.
The question is, do you want dust to be a 8 gb download while in beta ? It might even be bigger. Just be glad you only have to download 3 gb for now. Well, don't forget the updates (which cannot be done in the background). Not only is the game ~3GB, but there is almost 3GB in updates as well, and the updates cannot be paused so the PS3 is a slave to downloading until they are done. I was pretty ticked to have finally downloaded the installation package, only to find out I had to down isload the biggest update in gaming history (well, MSG4 might have Dust beat here). So yeah, if the game was 8GB and the updates were 3GB, that would be truly awful.
The updates replace a lot of content. the total size on your harddrive is about 3-4 Gb. Once the final build is out and it won't be huge test server patches for an update, *other than expansions* The graphics will get better when the textures are saved in a larger format. This will be most evident in the normal maps. Also once the os4 comes out they can just up the poly count using the new graphics tech they showed off at fanfest this year. Up to 2 million polygons in a scene running in real time on a mid line GPU. Up to 20 million polys.
Actully last I heard this was on track to be put into eve online by this winter expansion. |
crazy space
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 00:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong. Most PC gamers prefer graphics. They are graphic whores.
um... most PC gamers turn the graphics down as much as possible during competitive play... you're crazy, it's the console people who freak out over graphics. This game allready looks better than warhawk did and it's not even done. |
crazy space
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2012.09.26 23:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ieukoplast wrote:Icy Tiger wrote:I think people are exaggerating here. If it had crap graphics, I would not play it, no matter how good game play is. Thankfully, it has pretty good graphics, even pre e3 they were decent enough. In the long run, game play > graphics though. Pretty good graphics? ATM is it among the worst of all PS3 games, even those that came out in 2006/7.
Yeah but your wrong. why would you make a cliam like that then you can easily debunk your statement with a quick google image search of ps3 games from before there were normal maps in 2006? Warhawk looks terrible compared to dust and that game got a great score, 8/10 on graphics in 2006. Don't come in here trying to say dust looks like a ps2 game, obvious troll is obvious |
crazy space
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
879
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 03:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
we allready know they are keeping the file sizes small to limit the download during beta. You don't want an 8Gb Dust 514 download. OK? We'll get that later, hell even the HD remake of SotC is 7Gbs and that's a super high rez HD remake of a ps2 game.
Dust is being kept small in size for beta, deal with it. |
|
|
| |
|