DUST Search - [Discuss] Organising surrenders.......another proxy chat thread

Primus Core wrote:

Mavado V Noriega wrote:

Ok before ppl flip out and get their panties all stuck up their ass about lolleakedcomms lets take a look at this vid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3D7zV-NA2s

This was a classic MAG video someone showed me a while back, a surrender.......yes a fuckin surrender was organised during a clan match lol. One of the funniest things ive watched yet......CCP......get on that proxy chat....we need funny moments like this....especially when battles in DUST actually mean something having ppl surrender and discuss terms of the surrender midmatch is gonna be awesome lololol

PS: I have nothing against the ppl involved in this vid, just using as an example as the topic of making ppl surrender was brought up in a discussion with me and my guys

If i beat someone badly and they dont wanna lose clones we should be able to discuss as gentlemen the terms of surrender :P
Discuss.

A) We already have local chat. Not ideal when this game starts coming to spies and the like, but everyone can text chat in this box.

B) Leaders can open up a personal chat-channel and use that to discuss terms. There will be no voice chat, but again, you can still communicate with one another.

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming 2283	Posted - 2012.09.07 05:29:00 - [1] - Quote Ok before ppl flip out and get their panties all stuck up their ass about lolleakedcomms lets take a look at this vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3D7zV-NA2s This was a classic MAG video someone showed me a while back, a surrender.......yes a fuckin surrender was organised during a clan match lol. One of the funniest things ive watched yet......CCP......get on that proxy chat....we need funny moments like this....especially when battles in DUST actually mean something having ppl surrender and discuss terms of the surrender midmatch is gonna be awesome lololol PS: I have nothing against the ppl involved in this vid, just using as an example as the topic of making ppl surrender was brought up in a discussion with me and my guys If i beat someone badly and they dont wanna lose clones we should be able to discuss as gentlemen the terms of surrender :P Discuss.
STB Vermaak Doe 558	Posted - 2012.09.07 05:39:00 - [2] - Quote no. No. No!!! What kind of future would this be if i simple helmet can't keep audio from leaving it but still communicates using comms and earlike ports to hear through
RolyatDerTeufel D3ath D3alers RISE of LEGION 1648	Posted - 2012.09.07 05:47:00 - [3] - Quote damnnit... Alright I'm behind proxy chat cause of moments like these. So many awesome things have been done with it already, and to be honest i learned more random peoples names with this tool. Easy way to avoid it though since it would always be on, mute mic. (Helps concentrate for some)
Etero Narciss Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 112	Posted - 2012.09.07 05:57:00 - [4] - Quote This doesn't strike me as an argument for proxy chat. It does, however, seem as an argument for allowing opposing commanders to open up comm channels with each other so as to discuss the terms of surrender (whatever terms those could possibly be...)
Ten-Sidhe Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 414	Posted - 2012.09.07 06:22:00 - [5] - Quote Maybe a option to use external speaker, so nobody hears you regardless of distance unless external speaker on box is checked. Perhaps separate channels for push to talk on and off. Could be set push to proxy talk, just talk for team comms or vice versus...or push for team comms just talk for squad. Proxy could be heard if other guy is using it near by, but they won't hear you unless you turn it on to reply. EvE chat would allow setting up text chat with other side, and voice if both had uvt, I think this is first time I have seen use for uvt. (Out of battle chat seems more a keyboard type thing since it's hard to tell who is talking with large groups on voice.)
Billi Gene Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 130	Posted - 2012.09.07 06:26:00 - [6] - Quote step one tell tell team to leave battle step two press DS3 start button, select leave battle. no?... I could care less about griefing people, which in the end is what this seems to be all about. i guess some people just want to stand over a bunch of dying pixels and talk smack...imho.
Primus Core Brimstone Tactical Covert Intervention 22	Posted - 2012.09.07 08:38:00 - [7] - Quote Mavado V Noriega wrote: Ok before ppl flip out and get their panties all stuck up their ass about lolleakedcomms lets take a look at this vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3D7zV-NA2s This was a classic MAG video someone showed me a while back, a surrender.......yes a fuckin surrender was organised during a clan match lol. One of the funniest things ive watched yet......CCP......get on that proxy chat....we need funny moments like this....especially when battles in DUST actually mean something having ppl surrender and discuss terms of the surrender midmatch is gonna be awesome lololol PS: I have nothing against the ppl involved in this vid, just using as an example as the topic of making ppl surrender was brought up in a discussion with me and my guys If i beat someone badly and they dont wanna lose clones we should be able to discuss as gentlemen the terms of surrender :P Discuss. A) We already have local chat. Not ideal when this game starts coming to spies and the like, but everyone can text chat in this box. B) Leaders can open up a personal chat-channel and use that to discuss terms. There will be no voice chat, but again, you can still communicate with one another.
Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming 2283	Posted - 2012.09.07 11:00:00 - [8] - Quote Primus Core wrote: Mavado V Noriega wrote: Ok before ppl flip out and get their panties all stuck up their ass about lolleakedcomms lets take a look at this vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3D7zV-NA2s This was a classic MAG video someone showed me a while back, a surrender.......yes a fuckin surrender was organised during a clan match lol. One of the funniest things ive watched yet......CCP......get on that proxy chat....we need funny moments like this....especially when battles in DUST actually mean something having ppl surrender and discuss terms of the surrender midmatch is gonna be awesome lololol PS: I have nothing against the ppl involved in this vid, just using as an example as the topic of making ppl surrender was brought up in a discussion with me and my guys If i beat someone badly and they dont wanna lose clones we should be able to discuss as gentlemen the terms of surrender :P Discuss. A) We already have local chat. Not ideal when this game starts coming to spies and the like, but everyone can text chat in this box. B) Leaders can open up a personal chat-channel and use that to discuss terms. There will be no voice chat, but again, you can still communicate with one another. LOL was waiting on the EVE kid to say local , yeaaa buddy text chattin during an FPS match.....sooo many ppl will use that i can see it now love how so many ppl are against proxy chat like comms will really be leaked , good to know so many ppl here dont know exactly what proxy chat is and how comms wont ever really be leaked.......well......unless u like callin out ur strats during a gunfight......which at that point ur just being a ****** and deserve to lose anyway lol
ICECREAMK1NG WARRIORS 134	Posted - 2012.09.07 11:20:00 - [9] - Quote I think I played MAG as long as I did purley because of proxy. Great feature in a shooter, but trying to explain it to someone who's never played with it is pointless. Take note spaceship boys, you just saw a video of a FPS.
Ten-Sidhe Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 414	Posted - 2012.09.07 11:54:00 - [10] - Quote There are times I am close enough to enemy they could hear me, but they don't know I'm there. I have approached several enemy pointing same way undetected, if I was with squad we could take out group at once by calling a enemy and doing count down to fire. Proxy would prevent this if always on. External speakers make sense, a dust bunny may have to talk to a non-dropsuit equipped person at some point. Just add external speaker/vox as a channel to speak on, and have it always heard if in range. Then people that have a reason to use or not use it can set it that way and someone will always hear it unless they muted game. Local would be useless for this. Making a private channel and inviting enemy commander could work better then video went. Voice would require uvt though. Commanders were said to play from a rts like perspective aboard mcc, may not even be on map. Typed chat works in rts games, so it may be do able for commanders. I think surrenders will be tricks most of time though.

Billi Gene Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 130	Posted - 2012.09.07 13:28:00 - [11] - Quote hopefully DUST will have more to it then proxy chat, to keep people playing...... lol :P
EnglishSnake Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 1012	Posted - 2012.09.07 14:11:00 - [12] - Quote TBH no I have a helmet with comms in it so i dont have to scream at the guy next to me, plus proxy gives away tactics and it did in MAG so it will happen in DUST Also it gives away ppls positions
Jaiden Longshot Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION 216	Posted - 2012.09.07 15:28:00 - [13] - Quote Surrender? No Thanks Pretty sure CCP doesn't want anything like this either. You are in a clone and you never actually die. They want you to be a bit reckless. An organized surrender seems counter productive. Just drop down to militia gear and take your whoopin' That being said...there will likely be plenty of espionage. I just don't expect to see a clone army wave a white flag. I will admit to being entertained by proxy on many occasions but I don't think it should be a top priority. Plenty of other things need to be improved and more important features implemented before something like proxy, IMO.
mikegunnz Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION 425	Posted - 2012.09.07 15:46:00 - [14] - Quote I could care less about surrendering... but there is NO valid reason to not have proxy chat. I'm surprised that it hasn't been implemented already. TBH, I'd be disappointed if it didn't make it into the final build. The aspects of it giving away people's position, and overhearing plans of attack would only add "depth" to the battle. Isn't that what CCP is trying to achieve? Besides, It would have relatively small effect on battles. Mostly to just idiots who can't shut up, and end up giving up their position a lot, or blabbing about their teams plans randomly during battle. Main strategies, should be discussed and planned BEFORE a match. IMPLEMENTATION is what should be done DURING the match... and that requires very little actual comms.
Obama DAT Doomheim 389	Posted - 2012.09.07 15:56:00 - [15] - Quote Love me some proxy chat. Nothing better than sneaking up on snipers in MAG, giving them fair warning and then knifing them.
MofaceKilla Algintal Core Gallente Federation 138	Posted - 2012.09.07 16:24:00 - [16] - Quote Really don't understand why people want proxy chat, but this certainly isn't an argument for it. As others have said, make a Private chat before the game between leaders. Typing in it is annoying in fps, but of its for a surrender why does it matter? All it takes is a simple message to let the other person know to join that chat with a UVT to discuss terms. Who would honestly even take this seriously with proxy chat? You mean to tell me if you saw an enemy and he yelled "Don't shoot!" you'd listen? I sure as hell wouldn't. He'd be dead way before any deal could be struck.
Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming 2283	Posted - 2012.09.07 20:50:00 - [17] - Quote EnglishSnake wrote: TBH no I have a helmet with comms in it so i dont have to scream at the guy next to me, plus proxy gives away tactics and it did in MAG so it will happen in DUST Also it gives away ppls positions LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! pretty sure CCP does a fine job at making it so even a blind person can know where u are and exactly what direction u facing with the minimap atm nice try tho, was highly entertained zomg im within 5-10m of someone aka in a gunfight clearly ill be discussing my advanced super secret strats during this time instead of doing the common sense thing and call out the enemy....nope ** that...must discuss strats to leak comms....yeaa thats smart MAG had tactics?! holy fooled me there, pretty sure it was zerg a flank and ur good to go. just love when a proxy chat thread comes up and ppl get so up in arms about leaked comms when this never happens practically......well not unless ur a certified **** and do what i posted above lol
RolyatDerTeufel D3ath D3alers RISE of LEGION 1648	Posted - 2012.09.07 20:52:00 - [18] - Quote Etero Narciss wrote: This doesn't strike me as an argument for proxy chat. It does, however, seem as an argument for allowing opposing commanders to open up comm channels with each other so as to discuss the terms of surrender (whatever terms those could possibly be...) That'd work fine for me too. but Proxy Chat makes for alot of fun no matter what.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page