DUST Search - Any Muslims here?

4447 wrote:

Brahma El Indio wrote:

Quote:

US? what about everyone else?

I'm not refuting that other countries helped liberate Libya.

But it is undeniable fact that in most modern day conflicts where western allies are involved in cooperation, that the US is the strategic and tactical leader as well as the principal financier of such theaters of conflict.

This is because of the concept of "big battalions" and "might is right". The US wants to liberate a country, others are prepared to help. If this US does not want involvement in a theater, for example, Syria, then other western allies will not act alone. That's how the big battalions and might is right concepts work in modern geo-politics.

For the record, I'm Australian and I'm not a Muslim. I was against the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq as my firm belief is that all terror roads lead directly to a country I mentioned in an earlier post, which has an Islamic nuke. I always am amused when people worry about Iran getting nukes. Hello? Anybody home? Where do they get the nuke tech? AQ Khan. Pakistan. Same country that gave rise to the Taliban. Very fishy stuff in the geo-politic. Bin Laden casually holed up in a fortified compound in a military garrison town swarming with ISI security personnel and apparently they had no knowledge? Yeah right. I smell a rat.

Where have they put up the current leader all zahwiri? In a mansion in the government area of Islamabad? Would not surprise me.

Cloak and dagger stuff, truly.

libya was a mission run by the uk/french gov...


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Brahma El Indio Bragian Order Amarr Empire 171	Posted - 2012.09.08 07:57:00 - [1] - Quote Cpl Quartz wrote: [quote=Tony Calif]Take a Jew, a Hindu and a Muslim. Ask them to interpret Buddhist teachings. You'll get a different answer from every one. Just look at the northern ireland stuff kicking off. Even people who believe in the same god decide that they're right, everyone else is wrong. This is why religion is usually Internet suicide. trust you. Buddhism was invented by Hindus to civilise the Chinese. The Jew and Muslim interpretations of Buddhist teachings will be rubbish. Bit like asking Catholics to interpret the Inca beliefs. They couldn't understand so they just killed everyone and stole their stuff. Hmm. Thinking about what I just wrote. in Dust, we are going to kill each other to steal each others stuff. The Jew and the Muslim have been doing that since the birth of Islam. Maybe religion is appropriate here after all. Then again, maybe not.
Brahma El Indio Bragian Order Amarr Empire 171	Posted - 2012.09.12 21:20:00 - [2] - Quote Terram Nenokal wrote: [quote=KingBlade82][quote=Elijah Revan]As'Salaam Awakum brothers and sisters! When the game fully releases me and some friends will make a corp in EVE and Dust 514 for those who wish to show their passion for Allah! Ashadu anLa illah ha ill allah, wa ashadu anna mohammadun wa'raslla, audibillah min al'shaytan er rajeem! bismillah ir-rahman ir-rahim. So please brothers and sisters, put your PSN name below and i shall add you :D Christian brothers and sisters are welcome as well :) Anyone else, even if not Muslima is welcome to join to fight for Islam! Sami-allahu akbar Thoughts and peace to the families of recent murder victims, who were killed in the name of religion according to the news. It was plain to see the motivation of the attackers. The whole thing makes me feel so sick and angry. Just for the record, this post is not a flame on any religion and I am not a Muslim, nor will i ever be one, ever. Again, peace and thoughts with the families of the innocent.
Brahma El Indio Bragian Order Amarr Empire 171	Posted - 2012.09.13 00:55:00 - [3] - Quote History confirms that three related tribes, Jews, Christians and Muslims, have been at war with each other since the birth of Islam. It will never change. Ever. Before that, the Jews fought the Christians. And within the Muslim faith, when not busy fighting the others, they fight each other like Sunni and Shia. Just after 911, the US told Pakistan that they would be bombed back to the stone age if they took the Taliban's side in the war on terror. In a public speech, the then military dictator of the only nuclear armed islamic state, openly stated that Pakistani Muslims must employ the tactic espoused by the prophet, to appease one enemy in order to continue the long term fight against both. So they helped the US, not because they supported the cause, but for the reason that Islam cannot fight both the Jew and the Christian at the same time and expect to survive. The long term strategy of islam is to fight both the Jew and the Christian, but on the terms that the Muslims select. They generally select non state actor violence, what we call terrorism. It is a product of the values of the faith. Similar modus operandi can be traced back over hundreds of years, including the many Muslim incursions into India, from the times of Genghis khan. A lot of these raids were Iike modern day terror attacks. Swift, brutal and inflicting mass carnage on innocent and defenceless victims. Justified by Islam. The faith dictates, that those who are unbelievers, need to be brought to account before God and the faith enlists martyrs to bring the infidels to account. I do not agree with or support such an ideology however I respect the right of others to follow the ideology of their choosing, but I deny that anyone has any right to inflict their ideology on others using violence. Quite frankly the whole subject disgusts me.
Brahma El Indio Bragian Order Amarr Empire 171	Posted - 2012.09.13 01:36:00 - [4] - Quote crazy space wrote: Ragna Soul wrote: Icy Tiger wrote: Like I said, I do not be live in the killings as I said before. I believed in the protests, but the killers were not true Muslims. of course they werent if im correct true muslims wouldnt even consider taking this kind of action That's the horror of people using islam to control people, and to create zealots to do evil for them. just the other day someone was telling me why islam is bad and they all want to kill jews and hate us, ugh it's was sick to listen to so i put him in his place. he didn't believe me, but I wasn't going to sit there and listen to someone condem a religion based around peace just becuase 0.000001% of muslims would ever do a violent action in their life. Without getting into forum banning territory, I'll just say this. It's the leaders of men, the men themself that do evil. And using religion to do something evil does not make the region evil. I know lots of people of every creed and religion and they are all swell people. We live in an world with evil hiding in it's cracks, and sadly it's never going to go away. But lets try our best to be above that shall we? What amazes me is the memory issue....Or memory lapse to be specific.... By that I mean, that we all know the US role in liberating Libya recently. Its very recent history. Without the US, Gaddafi would still be in charge. Mohammed, on the other hand, lived from 570 to 672AD. That's a very long time ago. No one can say for sure or certainty that all things stated about this person in the modern world are factual, simply because there is no way to prove any of it. For that reason, the Islamic reaction to the Bacile film, is totally unreasonable and out of proportion. It would be simpler and smarter for the Muslims to refute what Bacile said in the film, because it cannot be proven in any way. Further, the recent memory of the US help in liberating Libya should mean something and be given respect. But the Muslims chose to play right into Bacile's hands by responding in the way his film suggests they would - with violence based on 1300 year old rhetoric. Muslims were at one stage some of the smartest folks in the world. They gave us mathematics, astronomy and complex architecture. Now, we note them more for destruction and the massacre of innocents and it really does not need to be this way.
Brahma El Indio Bragian Order Amarr Empire 171	Posted - 2012.09.13 02:00:00 - [5] - Quote Quote: US? what about everyone else? I'm not refuting that other countries helped liberate Libya. But it is undeniable fact that in most modern day conflicts where western allies are involved in cooperation, that the US is the strategic and tactical leader as well as the principal financier of such theaters of conflict. This is because of the concept of "big battalions" and "might is right". The US wants to liberate a country, others are prepared to help. If this US does not want involvement in a theater, for example, Syria, then other western allies will not act alone. That's how the big battalions and might is right concepts work in modern geo-politics. For the record, I'm Australian and I'm not a Muslim. I was against the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq as my firm belief is that all terror roads lead directly to a country I mentioned in an earlier post, which has an Islamic nuke. I always am amused when people worry about Iran getting nukes. Hello? Anybody home? Where do they get the nuke tech? AQ Khan. Pakistan. Same country that gave rise to the Taliban. Very fishy stuff in the geo-politic. Bin Laden casually holed up in a fortified compound in a military garrison town swarming with ISI security personnel and apparently they had no knowledge? Yeah right. I smell a rat. Where have they put up the current leader all zahwiri? In a mansion in the government area of Islamabad? Would not surprise me. Cloak and dagger stuff, truly.
Brahma El Indio Bragian Order Amarr Empire 171	Posted - 2012.09.13 02:08:00 - [6] - Quote 4447 wrote: Brahma El Indio wrote: Quote: US? what about everyone else? I'm not refuting that other countries helped liberate Libya. But it is undeniable fact that in most modern day conflicts where western allies are involved in cooperation, that the US is the strategic and tactical leader as well as the principal financier of such theaters of conflict. This is because of the concept of "big battalions" and "might is right". The US wants to liberate a country, others are prepared to help. If this US does not want involvement in a theater, for example, Syria, then other western allies will not act alone. That's how the big battalions and might is right concepts work in modern geo-politics. For the record, I'm Australian and I'm not a Muslim. I was against the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq as my firm belief is that all terror roads lead directly to a country I mentioned in an earlier post, which has an Islamic nuke. I always am amused when people worry about Iran getting nukes. Hello? Anybody home? Where do they get the nuke tech? AQ Khan. Pakistan. Same country that gave rise to the Taliban. Very fishy stuff in the geo-politic. Bin Laden casually holed up in a fortified compound in a military garrison town swarming with ISI security personnel and apparently they had no knowledge? Yeah right. I smell a rat. Where have they put up the current leader all zahwiri? In a mansion in the government area of Islamabad? Would not surprise me. Cloak and dagger stuff, truly. libya was a mission run by the uk/french gov... You forget to add, "with US backing" It wasn't until the US offered logistical support that the operations begun. Same reason why Syria job is right now un-do-able. No US logistical support for military operations. US backing, then things happen....
Brahma El Indio Bragian Order Amarr Empire 171	Posted - 2012.09.13 02:10:00 - [7] - Quote Elijah Revan wrote: ENOUGH. Agreed. No more from me on this topic. Enough said.