DUST Search - Stop forcing us into Ambush

Lazarus Solo wrote:

fenrir storm wrote:

tribal wyvern wrote:

Lazarus Solo wrote:

I think they should scrap it altogether. The people that play this game aren't interested in Ambush or they would be playing COD.

The spawns can be improved so you don't spawn in the crosshairs of an enemy, sure, but there's still no objective except to kill. I find that boring and pointless. Like in MAG, I want to play a game mode that will make a difference. A mode with objectives that matter.

They won't scrap ambush, dust is designed to cater to EVERYONE dude, not just a certain fanbase. Some people who like ambush hate skirmish and vice versa. When the battle finder gets put back up......you don't have to play ambush if you don't want to.
Plus, ambush is a good way to earn isk/sp with militia gear.

It also shows how poor the shooting mechanics still are, and still dont seem to be getting much attention.

Exactly. DUST has to attend to its own niche, which is a much more in depth version of MAG. This is what MAG players are looking to as a sequel, it is what EVE players will play, and I suspect Battlefield players also.

The shooting mechanics are far from perfect, but the team working aspect is great.

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lazarus Solo KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 66	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:09:00 - [1] - Quote CCP, stop making us play Ambush. Pretty please? I HATE it.
VigSniper101 204	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:10:00 - [2] - Quote I know this answer is old but...... Testing.
tribal wyvern ZionTCD Legacy Rising 673	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:13:00 - [3] - Quote Lazarus Solo wrote: CCP, stop making us play Ambush. Pretty please? I HATE it. I hate ambush too. never been a fan of team deathmatch, COD killed it for me, BUT......they need to test ambush more than skirmish, and that's why we are here......to test, so I'll stick it out as long as I have to.
VigSniper101 204	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:14:00 - [4] - Quote tribal wyvern wrote: Lazarus Solo wrote: CCP, stop making us play Ambush. Pretty please? I HATE it. I hate ambush too. never been a fan of team deathmatch, COD killed it for me, BUT......they need to test ambush more than skirmish, and that's why we are here......to test, so I'll stick it out as long as I have to. Loved Team Deathmatch in Warhawk....not so much here. It needs objectives and team bases.
Valklear Leosude 20	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:16:00 - [5] - Quote Heres what Im wondering though. Why are we doing all this testing in a game mode that pretty much everyone hates and no one wants to play?
tribal wyvern ZionTCD Legacy Rising 673	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:21:00 - [6] - Quote Valklear Leosude wrote: Heres what Im wondering though. Why are we doing all this testing in a game mode that pretty much everyone hates and no one wants to play? For feedback. Feedback on bugs, issues, and enjoyment or dislike for the mode. But to be honest ambush is always going to be there. The majority of dusters prefer skirmish but there's always a % of people who don't have time for a lengthy game of skirmish.......so they choose ambush instead. Ambush is the marmite of game modes, you either love it or hate it.
VigSniper101 204	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:22:00 - [7] - Quote Valklear Leosude wrote: Heres what Im wondering though. Why are we doing all this testing in a game mode that pretty much everyone hates and no one wants to play? To hopefully make it better? Whats the saying...dont fix if it aint broke. Skirmish is awesome, Ambush needs help.
dent 308 Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 967	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:22:00 - [8] - Quote What is the problem with ambush? Have someone bring an uplink, everyone else bring injectors. Rally early and often, fight on the ground of your choice as you don't have to take/defend letters. Easy.
arimal lavaren L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising 186	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:29:00 - [9] - Quote So much this. A half dozen lone wolves are simply not going to be as effective as a tight knit squad that supports each other. With a good squad we leave most ambush games with 20+ clones in the bank and I'm a mediocre marksman at best.
VigSniper101 204	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:30:00 - [10] - Quote dent 308 wrote: What is the problem with ambush? Have someone bring an uplink, everyone else bring injectors. Rally early and often, fight on the ground of your choice as you don't have to take/defend letters. Easy. Easy....and fun, two different things.

Lazarus Solo KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 66	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:31:00 - [11] - Quote I think they should scrap it altogether. The people that play this game aren't interested in Ambush or they would be playing COD. The spawns can be improved so you don't spawn in the crosshairs of an enemy, sure, but there's still no objective except to kill. I find that boring and pointless. Like in MAG, I want to play a game mode that will make a difference. A mode with objectives that matter.
tribal wyvern ZionTCD Legacy Rising 673	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:37:00 - [12] - Quote Lazarus Solo wrote: I think they should scrap it altogether. The people that play this game aren't interested in Ambush or they would be playing COD. The spawns can be improved so you don't spawn in the crosshairs of an enemy, sure, but there's still no objective except to kill. I find that boring and pointless. Like in MAG, I want to play a game mode that will make a difference. A mode with objectives that matter. They won't scrap ambush, dust is designed to cater to EVERYONE dude, not just a certain fanbase. Some people who like ambush hate skirmish and vice versa. When the battle finder gets put back up......you don't have to play ambush if you don't want to. Plus, ambush is a good way to earn isk/sp with militia gear.
fenrir storm Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 314	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:47:00 - [13] - Quote tribal wyvern wrote: Lazarus Solo wrote: I think they should scrap it altogether. The people that play this game aren't interested in Ambush or they would be playing COD. The spawns can be improved so you don't spawn in the crosshairs of an enemy, sure, but there's still no objective except to kill. I find that boring and pointless. Like in MAG, I want to play a game mode that will make a difference. A mode with objectives that matter. They won't scrap ambush, dust is designed to cater to EVERYONE dude, not just a certain fanbase. Some people who like ambush hate skirmish and vice versa. When the battle finder gets put back up......you don't have to play ambush if you don't want to. Plus, ambush is a good way to earn isk/sp with militia gear. It also shows how poor the shooting mechanics still are, and still dont seem to be getting much attention.
Nomed Deeps The Exemplars 91	Posted - 2012.08.28 15:47:00 - [14] - Quote Everyone has a preferred mode and due to the testing of Instant Battle, we now don't have an option. As there are bugs with Instant Battle still, I doubt we'll get those options back any time soon (but that is just mere speculation).
Lazarus Solo KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 66	Posted - 2012.08.28 16:13:00 - [15] - Quote fenrir storm wrote: tribal wyvern wrote: Lazarus Solo wrote: I think they should scrap it altogether. The people that play this game aren't interested in Ambush or they would be playing COD. The spawns can be improved so you don't spawn in the crosshairs of an enemy, sure, but there's still no objective except to kill. I find that boring and pointless. Like in MAG, I want to play a game mode that will make a difference. A mode with objectives that matter. They won't scrap ambush, dust is designed to cater to EVERYONE dude, not just a certain fanbase. Some people who like ambush hate skirmish and vice versa. When the battle finder gets put back up......you don't have to play ambush if you don't want to. Plus, ambush is a good way to earn isk/sp with militia gear. It also shows how poor the shooting mechanics still are, and still dont seem to be getting much attention. Exactly. DUST has to attend to its own niche, which is a much more in depth version of MAG. This is what MAG players are looking to as a sequel, it is what EVE players will play, and I suspect Battlefield players also. The shooting mechanics are far from perfect, but the team working aspect is great.
fenrir storm Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 314	Posted - 2012.08.28 16:20:00 - [16] - Quote Lazarus Solo wrote: fenrir storm wrote: tribal wyvern wrote: Lazarus Solo wrote: I think they should scrap it altogether. The people that play this game aren't interested in Ambush or they would be playing COD. The spawns can be improved so you don't spawn in the crosshairs of an enemy, sure, but there's still no objective except to kill. I find that boring and pointless. Like in MAG, I want to play a game mode that will make a difference. A mode with objectives that matter. They won't scrap ambush, dust is designed to cater to EVERYONE dude, not just a certain fanbase. Some people who like ambush hate skirmish and vice versa. When the battle finder gets put back up......you don't have to play ambush if you don't want to. Plus, ambush is a good way to earn isk/sp with militia gear. It also shows how poor the shooting mechanics still are, and still dont seem to be getting much attention. Exactly. DUST has to attend to its own niche, which is a much more in depth version of MAG. This is what MAG players are looking to as a sequel, it is what EVE players will play, and I suspect Battlefield players also. The shooting mechanics are far from perfect, but the team working aspect is great. True to some extent but not much use being in a good team if none of you can hit the side of a bus when most needed
Lazarus Solo KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 66	Posted - 2012.08.28 20:09:00 - [17] - Quote I think in future if Ambush loads and i'm not in a drop ship or a tank, i'm just going to quit. I can't stand being on foot in Ambush anymore.
DUST Fiend Immobile Infantry 1903	Posted - 2012.08.28 20:14:00 - [18] - Quote Ambush is awesome, though I literally haven't played a single game of skirmish this build....


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page