|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 05:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
I don't think they're completely op, i just think they don't have any good downside.
Some ways to fix this could be to make the number carried a bit less or to lower the damage to under 1000.
What's your opinion
If anything think of this as a joke thread because they're in all my fits |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 05:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ayures II wrote:Grit Breather wrote:They do have a very obvious downside - They don't work against infantry. I'd call that balanced. They also seem to take about a year to detonate.
Thats if you throw them at infantry or not close enough to vehicles |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 05:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Grit Breather wrote:They do have a very obvious downside - They don't work against infantry. I'd call that balanced.
True but if I'm not mistaken they do more damage than the standard for guns of equal tier. Correct me if I'm wrong |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 05:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Honestly, they seem OP now because HAVs were heavily nerfed before they buffed AV grenades. If HAVs were returned to their former stats with the new price increase to keep their usage in check, the AV nades would seem a lot less overpowered.
I actually agree with this |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 05:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:STB Vermaak Doe wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Honestly, they seem OP now because HAVs were heavily nerfed before they buffed AV grenades. If HAVs were returned to their former stats with the new price increase to keep their usage in check, the AV nades would seem a lot less overpowered. I actually agree with this Again, as I've said in other threads, CCP can't keep nerfing things based on complaints about assets that don't have all their counters in place. I know that ignoring such things leads to pissed off whiners, but that's their problem.
I'm for them, i just hope the counter comes soon |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 06:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
BlacMage wrote:STB Vermaak Doe wrote:I don't think they're completely op, i just think they don't have any good downside.
Some ways to fix this could be to make the number carried a bit less or to lower the damage to under 1000.
What's your opinion
If anything think of this as a joke thread because they're in all my fits 1000 Sounds like a lot, and it is for LAVs, A HAV with armour module can have over five times that amount, so I guess it id up to what kind of build you are rolling... Maybe AV grenades could scale to type closer to how vehicles scale by level?
It's less than it is now and that could work |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 06:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:STB Vermaak Doe wrote:I don't think they're completely op, i just think they don't have any good downside.
Some ways to fix this could be to make the number carried a bit less or to lower the damage to under 1000.
What's your opinion
If anything think of this as a joke thread because they're in all my fits Right! Not that a certain group using Gunnlogi tanks were redling folks match after match And that group just had STB in there And forge guns got a nerf So lets nerf the only thing left that can maybe do tiny amounts of damage to the Precious Not that your group has any vested interest in nerfing AV grenades Hey I have an idea to fix the AV grenades! I can just stand in the middle of the road to be cleansed by the tank treads of our tank overlords.
Why the kitten does everyone immediately bring up the stb name? I got kicked from the group genius. They need go fix the forge gun's range because i quit heavy because of the nerf |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 06:34:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:AV nades are fine smart HAV drives know how to position themselves
before they were useless now they are actually useful and as someone said the downside is it doesnt work on infantry
People start with the skill to use them, they're dirt cheep, and it's easy to 1v1 a vehicle with them |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 06:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:lol HAV's nerfed? AV grenades op? lies the only thing is that you see alot of people rolling militia tanks with crappy modules. I rock now a soma with 5803 HP on the armor a 25% damage amplifier a repair module and a F45 damage controll unit.. To get more PG i got a 15% PG module and the weapons are a large missile turret with increased missile speed, 2 small missile turrets that can be fired every 0.8 seconds. If anything is in my way i blast them away with alot of firepower. And im still rolling the same tank for like 10 matches. ISK and SP vending machine if you ask me. And im going after a madrugar when i got enough ISK for the skillbook. When you face a well fit tank you cant solo it. I tried it and failed hard against a gunnlogi.
I'm not using militia modules but whenever someone with av grenades gets close, bye bye investment |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 06:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
STB-TedNugent EV wrote:They were refering to me and Lurch... we owned every match tonight.. lost 1 Gunnlogi all day.. sorry you guys but i did pay for it so im going to use it... just saying... happy hunting mercs :-)
Is it ok if i group with you guys even though i got booted? |
|
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 07:17:00 -
[11] - Quote
STB-TedNugent EV wrote:why were you kicked in the first place? better yet who kicked you and that will help me tell you if its cool or not.... we are actively recruiting so i dont know whats going on
Quickgloves and because i was spying on another group. He said i could still play matches with him but i have to drop the title next wipe |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 07:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
STB-TedNugent EV wrote:ahh i heard somethin about this.. yea we dont need spys or want spys it made you look bad and sounded bad on your part as well.... we have a force of guys in the beta that can run over guys with ease... i cant make any promises but i will ask and see whats up Ok and don't see the spy business as weakness on the battlefield , I'm not a forum warrior unlike the majority of a clan that will remain nameless |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 07:29:00 -
[13] - Quote
STB-TedNugent EV wrote:STB Vermaak Doe wrote:STB-TedNugent EV wrote:ahh i heard somethin about this.. yea we dont need spys or want spys it made you look bad and sounded bad on your part as well.... we have a force of guys in the beta that can run over guys with ease... i cant make any promises but i will ask and see whats up Ok and don't see the spy business as weakness on the battlefield , I'm not a forum warrior unlike the majority of a clan that will remain nameless are you calling us nameless? confused by what you mean.... im not a forum warrior either i just wanted to see the rage we caused... with our tank domination... read some of the forums posts you will see that too
No not stb a different group i won't talk about diretly. Also my tank is a blaster/missle tank so ground troops get wrecked. |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 07:40:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:STB Vermaak Doe wrote:STB-TedNugent EV wrote:STB Vermaak Doe wrote:STB-TedNugent EV wrote:ahh i heard somethin about this.. yea we dont need spys or want spys it made you look bad and sounded bad on your part as well.... we have a force of guys in the beta that can run over guys with ease... i cant make any promises but i will ask and see whats up Ok and don't see the spy business as weakness on the battlefield , I'm not a forum warrior unlike the majority of a clan that will remain nameless are you calling us nameless? confused by what you mean.... im not a forum warrior either i just wanted to see the rage we caused... with our tank domination... read some of the forums posts you will see that too No not stb a different group i won't talk about diretly. Also my tank is a blaster/missle tank so ground troops get wrecked. Unless theres folks like me around that enjoy killing tanks for the lols at folks loosing all that isk since all I run is militia gear. And the lamest moment today was some HAV driver whos ride was about to go down and they suicide instead of dealing with the fact that I killed there ride.
I hate militia av... |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 07:47:00 -
[15] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:what a welp... properly fit tanks have 10k-20k ehp and 1k damage grenade bothers you? really? maybe dont drive mindlessly and stop camping a single spot then?
It does 2k and the most I've gotten to is 6k shields. What a uninformed troll. |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 08:01:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:STB-TedNugent EV wrote:STB Vermaak Doe wrote:Jack McReady wrote:what a welp... properly fit tanks have 10k-20k ehp and 1k damage grenade bothers you? really? maybe dont drive mindlessly and stop camping a single spot then? It does 2k and the most I've gotten to is 6k shields. What a uninformed troll. he is adding his shield rep to ehp - effective hit points.... i dont know about 20k maybe he is adding the resistance percentage as well ? math too hard for you? once people get in sagaris tanks 15k effective shield hp will be very common (or armor if you get the gallente counterpart). lower tier tanks can also get to 10k total effective hp but it is really not my fault that you fit your tank with militia stuff
If you read the other posts you would know I'm not using militia mods other than a cpu module |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 08:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:No Nerf for AV nades. Simple. No nerf, just one of my suggestions |
STB Vermaak Doe
558
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 08:18:00 -
[18] - Quote
@ jack if you're so smart, tell me a good basic armour tank fit for a militia tank |
|
|
|