DUST Search - 12 vs. 12 Is Too Boring

All Channels

General Discussions

12 vs. 12 Is Too Boring

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
frfqq Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 81	Posted - 2012.08.20 19:20:00 - [1] - Quote The maps are too big for 24 players. You have to run around way too much to find some action, and sometimes over half the enemy team sit in LAVs/tanks all game which makes the game even more boring and you end up running circles around the map trying to find a single person to kill. How much longer until support for 48 players?
Icy Tiger 496	Posted - 2012.08.20 19:23:00 - [2] - Quote Its actually 32, but Ambush sucks anyways.
Kyzar Sosai 8	Posted - 2012.08.20 19:27:00 - [3] - Quote frfqq wrote: The maps are too big for 24 players. You have to run around way too much to find some action, and sometimes over half the enemy team sit in LAVs/tanks all game which makes the game even more boring and you end up running circles around the map trying to find a single person to kill. How much longer until support for 48 players? Best find a "blob unit" to merge/move with
Garrett Blacknova Codex Troopers 1849	Posted - 2012.08.20 19:28:00 - [4] - Quote We already have 32 players - 16 vs. 16.
Cmdr Firezone38 Algintal Core Gallente Federation 6	Posted - 2012.08.20 19:40:00 - [5] - Quote frfqq wrote: The maps are too big for 24 players. You have to run around way too much to find some action, and sometimes over half the enemy team sit in LAVs/tanks all game which makes the game even more boring and you end up running circles around the map trying to find a single person to kill. How much longer until support for 48 players? We are going to have more then 48 players.
Kengfa 138	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:25:00 - [6] - Quote Possibilities are... 32v32 44v44 128v128 (Maybe higher?)
Crimson MoonV Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 658	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:28:00 - [7] - Quote Kengfa wrote: Possibilities are... 32v32 44v44 128v128 (Maybe higher?) PS3 can't handle 128 vs 128. 64 vs 64 will more then likely be the max until dust moves to PS4.
Kengfa 138	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:32:00 - [8] - Quote Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: Possibilities are... 32v32 44v44 128v128 (Maybe higher?) PS3 can't handle 128 vs 128. 64 vs 64 will more then likely be the max until dust moves to PS4. You've no idea what you're talking about. Mag is 256 players. It'll go beyond 256 on PS4, if they even change number of players. 256 has been tested and works fine. Most likely choice is 88 players as that's what they have previously said, but they want more.
Crimson MoonV Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 658	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:34:00 - [9] - Quote Kengfa wrote: Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: Possibilities are... 32v32 44v44 128v128 (Maybe higher?) PS3 can't handle 128 vs 128. 64 vs 64 will more then likely be the max until dust moves to PS4. You've no idea what you're talking about. Mag is 256 players. It'll go beyond 256 on PS4, if they even change number of players. 256 has been tested and works fine. Most likely choice is 88 players as that's what they have previously said, but they want more. Have you played mag? The 256 game mode became a lag fest and constantly froze after 2.0. It was unstable partially because the PS3 couldn't handle it and zipper sucked balls.
Kengfa 138	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:35:00 - [10] - Quote Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: Possibilities are... 32v32 44v44 128v128 (Maybe higher?) PS3 can't handle 128 vs 128. 64 vs 64 will more then likely be the max until dust moves to PS4. You've no idea what you're talking about. Mag is 256 players. It'll go beyond 256 on PS4, if they even change number of players. 256 has been tested and works fine. Most likely choice is 88 players as that's what they have previously said, but they want more. Have you played mag? The 256 game mode became a lag fest and constantly froze after a few patches. It was unstable. Lag is connection-related not ram/CPU related. 256 was tested and works on dust.

Nighthawk0430 Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 27	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:36:00 - [11] - Quote Kengfa wrote: Possibilities are... 32v32 44v44 128v128 (Maybe higher?) 128v128 would be almost impossible to do, there is no way it would go anywhere higher than that. There has only been 1 game to pull off the 128v128 (Ps3 exclusive MAG released back in 2010 to decent praise, held about an 8/10 due to good gameplay, but technical issues), and even that game only had 1 mode that supported the 128v128. 64v64 would probably be the highest they would go, as that is a good match size, at least I think so. So crimson, the PS3 could handle it, it is just very unlikely to see due to the technology
Kengfa 138	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:39:00 - [12] - Quote IT. HAS. BEEN. TESTED. AND. WORKS.
Crimson MoonV Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 658	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:39:00 - [13] - Quote Kengfa wrote: Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: Possibilities are... 32v32 44v44 128v128 (Maybe higher?) PS3 can't handle 128 vs 128. 64 vs 64 will more then likely be the max until dust moves to PS4. You've no idea what you're talking about. Mag is 256 players. It'll go beyond 256 on PS4, if they even change number of players. 256 has been tested and works fine. Most likely choice is 88 players as that's what they have previously said, but they want more. Have you played mag? The 256 game mode became a lag fest and constantly froze after a few patches. It was unstable. Lag is connection-related not ram/CPU related. 256 was tested and works on dust. 256 has been tested on dust? Source please?
Kengfa 138	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:40:00 - [14] - Quote The source is talking to devs on the IRC.
Crimson MoonV Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 658	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:42:00 - [15] - Quote Kengfa wrote: The source is talking to devs on the IRC. That's what I thought, you have no source.
Kengfa 138	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:42:00 - [16] - Quote Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: The source is talking to devs on the IRC. That's what I thought, you have no source. When did speaking to developers mean no source? (Unreliable but another source besides myself: http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/971420-dust-514/62394693)
Crimson MoonV Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 658	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:49:00 - [17] - Quote Kengfa wrote: Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: The source is talking to devs on the IRC. That's what I thought, you have no source. When did speaking to developers mean no source? That's not a real source. You could just be making that up. I talked to the developers and they said they were adding pink dropships and nova swords.
Kengfa 138	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:50:00 - [18] - Quote Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: The source is talking to devs on the IRC. That's what I thought, you have no source. When did speaking to developers mean no source? That's not a real source. You could just be making that up. I talked to the developers and they said they were adding pink dropships and nova swords. **** it, you clearly want to be a dumbass about it. I'm gone.
Crimson MoonV Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 658	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:54:00 - [19] - Quote Kengfa wrote: Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: The source is talking to devs on the IRC. That's what I thought, you have no source. When did speaking to developers mean no source? That's not a real source. You could just be making that up. I talked to the developers and they said they were adding pink dropships and nova swords. **** it, you clearly want to be a dumbass about it. I'm gone. You mad. I read your unreliable source and it just said that they tested it. Not that it "works fine". Rumor tbh.
843-MastaYoda EV 6	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:54:00 - [20] - Quote Crimson MoonV wrote: Kengfa wrote: Possibilities are... 32v32 44v44 128v128 (Maybe higher?) PS3 can't handle 128 vs 128. 64 vs 64 will more then likely be the max until dust moves to PS4. crimson moon you play mag...you should know that it can handle it..at the cost of server quality and graphics...

Garrett Blacknova Codex Troopers 1849	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:54:00 - [21] - Quote The devs mentioned in-house testing of 64 vs. 64 during the previous build, pretty sure there were transcripts posted here at the very least, and it might have been posted here by one of the devs as well. It's reasonable to assume that they've also tested higher numbers than that in the time since. Saying it works MIGHT mean "it works on a LAN" though, so it's not necessarily something they'll be implementing in the full game.
843-MastaYoda EV 6	Posted - 2012.08.21 01:58:00 - [22] - Quote also to Kengfa..you need to stop playing this game..like really? I see you call so many people a dumbass im beginning to wonder if you think your the only one thats smart..Well your wrong..128 players? the only game to do that is MAG and its the most laggy experience ever. Please this Forum is for a discussion so many different people are entitled to their many different opinions...how about you respect that and accept the fact that your not the smart one in the group..Learn some damn manners already. Calling people a dumbass for their opinion is wrong. In our country we like to have that freedom to say something without being talked down to by others like you. Again please learn some damn manners.
The Warbot Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 85	Posted - 2012.08.21 02:04:00 - [23] - Quote Actually I never did have a bad experience with the 128 vs 128 mode (Domination) in MAG. Well out of a whole year that I have played through it, my ps3 froze but thats just a few times. I'm sure 256 players is well supported. Just a matter if CCP decides to implement it. I would love to test it.
Crimson MoonV Amarr Templars Amarr Empire 658	Posted - 2012.08.21 02:08:00 - [24] - Quote The Warbot wrote: Actually I never did have a bad experience with the 128 vs 128 mode (Domination) in MAG. Well out of a whole year that I have played through it, my ps3 froze but thats just a few times. I'm sure 256 players is well supported. Just a matter if CCP decides to implement it. I would love to test it. You must have never played in japan prime time.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.