+ 1

Same here

From the wiki "Burden of proof is also an important concept in the public arena of ideas. Assuming both sides have agreed to reasoned discourse." when has a game forum ever been "reasoned discourse"? No reasoned discourse so no need for burden of proof however you could use quantum entanglement. Viewing the server determines its value of on or off. Check Schr+¦dinger's cat. Lol thats what I look at when servers are down lol

Servers are up my rear end.

That (underlined) would be the part I deny. As you say, it could be anything (on the menu) in the box, but to say it's all of them doesn't make any sense to me. You're saying it's both the vegetarian burger and the chicken sandwich (and everything else on the menu) at the same time? wut

Then I'd probably question the use of the word "is". To say something "is", to me, says it exists as "this" and "not that". If you want to say "their potential", which I'm fine with, then you should use the phrase "could be X, Y or Z" which I'm also fine with. But to say it "is" everything just doesn't make sense to me. I guess if we're using different definitions of "is" then it works out (though we already have words for what you want that definition to be, it's "could be").

This really is not the place for those kind of questions

yea I made a thread requesting Magic in Dust and that went of off all strange 2

Well then it seems, even if we do accept the many worlds theory, that the question falls into a sort of equivocation trap. In other words, when we say "possibility X is this and that and that, etc" we're using different definitions of "is". Unless we want that definition to include every possible other world and all events/objects therein.

And once we do that, it seems all epistemic (knowledge-based) claims become meaningless, because even once you saw the cat as alive or dead, let's say alive, couldn't you also say the cat is dead (again, if we use the definition of "is" that includes all possible other worlds) because in another world it is, in fact, dead? Once you allow for that, all statements become meaningless since their exact opposite or any other variations would be true too.