|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
153
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Greasy, we only present information given to us by CCP at fanfest, or E3, or any presentation given by them. There's already a lot of media on the game on youtube, the information's all there.
We do speculate, but there's a lot of language in that speculation that shows we're only guessing.
Oh, and DUST and EVE are in the same universe. Makes sense to have things consistent, yeah? So if it's in EVE, and relevant to DUST, it'll probably be in DUST. Funny, that, huh? |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
153
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:ummmmm....again the arrogance and sarcasm is for the birds, funny how eve players always think they know what dust is bringing out and in fact you tools know nothing, it may be the same universe there highspeed not the same game not even close to the same combat sequence again your statement is full of holes and the original feedback on this thread was to point out that eve doesnt run dust which even you seem to believe...im fully aware of e3 and the negative comments have come from butt hurt eve players.
Giggle, even though I know I'm feeding you, I'm still amused by replying.
EVE runs DUST. They pay for merc contracts, and therefore, merc dropsuits, vehicles, installations, etc. DUST would be nothing without EVE. It's a good game, but the main selling point is its integration with the EVE universe.
Also, how is it arrogance to say that I've heard CCP devs say that this will be in the game, or is planned to be in the game, so it probably will? And no, that wasn't sarcasm, or even rhetoric. I want a genuine answer as to how that's either arrogance, sarcasm or rhetoric.
Yes, I know EVE and DUST aren't the same game, but if you have a tank which can shoot down a battleship, when an orbital bombardment from a destroyer can destroy a tank... Well. That's not very logical, is it? |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
153
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:you cant be arrogant about something eve people cant prove and or physically take part in....they intend for the release to be that way but at the moment again the thread is about people running at the mouth acting as if they already know what would happen in battle...
What do you mean by that? I've never encountered anyone who has said "this will play out that way, or that way". Your original post seemed to suggest that EVE players seemed to know better what features were coming into the game than other players.
We have information that CCP wants to extend a map to the size of an entire planet, some day. We have information that they want to include other planet types. We have information that they want to bring in a lot more features, such as laser rifles. How do we have this information? CCP presentations on the matter. We get our information from CCP and present it as such, we don't speculate and present it as fact. |
|
|
|