Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Grit Breather
BetaMax.
660
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 07:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXIkL_m4Dfs&feature=relmfu First off, have a look at the sequence between 1:50 and 2:03. That's how inertial dampeners should work. Just look at all the damage they cause when they "hit". I know that car has an engine of some sort and not dampeners but the expelled energy should be similar.
Also, all those black and while troops throughout the trailer - Dust mercs? |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 07:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
Grit Breather wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXIkL_m4Dfs&feature=relmfuFirst off, have a look at the sequence between 1:50 and 2:03. That's how inertial dampeners should work. Just look at all the damage they cause when they "hit". I know that car has an engine of some sort and not dampeners but the expelled energy should be similar. Also, all those black and while troops throughout the trailer - Dust mercs?
They should definitely be doing damage upon impact, and considering the mercs in the Fanfest trailer did make craters in the ground, I think they will. I've landed on a sniper once, he lived, I didn't. |
Rasatsu
Much Crying Old Experts
437
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 08:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
When inertia is being dampened, what makes you think there's a lot of inertia in the falling object? |
Grit Breather
BetaMax.
660
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 08:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
OK. Energy doesn't disappear. One of the strongest constants in the universe is the amount of energy. You can never subtract or add to it (well there are nuclear explsions and such but they have strict formulas and are not what I'm talking about here). Energy is just transformed from one type to another. Inertial dampeners take in A LOT of gravitational energy and have to expel it somehow. My favourite theory is that they just take away from the energy felt by the riding merc and project it outwards. Rather like landing on a pillow. But there are other theories we can take like converting it into thermal energy and producing a very large amount of head upon impact. Or you could convert it into light and just look like a commet coming in for impact.
In order to weaponise the inertial dampener, we must convert the gravitational energy into something that's useful to us. Light would be bad as it would show enemies where we are. So either the pillow effect (my favourite!) or thermal. In the latter case you'd be literally melting anyone you land on. A bit like the time travel scenes from Terminator where the ball vaporizes anything within its radius. |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 08:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
Rasatsu wrote:When inertia is being dampened, what makes you think there's a lot of inertia in the falling object? .
Inertia doesn't go away. It can't. What the inertial dampeners do is "capture" what is in side, so IT doesn't feel the impact as much, the outside of the bubble will receive every ounce of energy of the impact. |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 08:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Grit Breather wrote:well there are nuclear explsions and such but they have strict formulas and are not what I'm talking about here
All nuclear energy does, is release energy bound in matter.
When using the term Dark energy and matter, it is just referring to the energy and matter we can't detect directly, but must be there for the equations we have to make sense. It is a placeholder till we can dig into that aspect of the universe, the idea is that dark energy is to light energy, what antimatter is to matter, except that instead of a massive energy release upon contact, dark and light energy might just do the opposite, and cancel each other out entirely.
Lawrence Krauss have the following interesting formula for the universe:
(Light energy + energy bound in light matter) - (dark energy + energy bound in dark matter) = 0.
In other words, the universe did come from nothing.
|
Grit Breather
BetaMax.
660
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 08:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dewie Cheecham wrote:Grit Breather wrote:well there are nuclear explsions and such but they have strict formulas and are not what I'm talking about here All nuclear energy does, is release energy bound in matter. When using the term Dark energy and matter, it is just referring to the energy and matter we can't detect directly, but must be there for the equations we have to make sense. It is a placeholder till we can dig into that aspect of the universe, the idea is that dark energy is to light energy, what antimatter is to matter, except that instead of a massive energy release upon contact, dark and light energy might just do the opposite, and cancel each other out entirely. Lawrence Krauss have the following interesting formula for the universe: (Light energy + energy bound in light matter) - (dark energy + energy bound in dark matter) = 0. In other words, the universe did come from nothing. Interesting. Much obliged. However, that nuclear part was just a side note which I was ignoring for the sake of that arguement. While interesting I still think it's irrelevant to the discussion of inertial dampeners. |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 09:51:00 -
[8] - Quote
Grit Breather wrote: Interesting. Much obliged. However, that nuclear part was just a side note which I was ignoring for the sake of that arguement. While interesting I still think it's irrelevant to the discussion of inertial dampeners.
True :P |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |