DUST Search - kills per war points earned

All Channels

General Discussions

kills per war points earned

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zeran Haggai Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 196	Posted - 2012.07.28 04:48:00 - [1] - Quote PDIGGY22 wrote: STB-stlcarlos989 EV wrote: PDIGGY22 wrote: STB-stlcarlos989 EV wrote: PDIGGY22 wrote: give up, the OP read "kills per war points" not sure how that is misleading Because you don't specify that YOUR opinion is that having a majority of your WP be from kills makes you a more skilled player. Most players feel that getting WP from other aspects helps the team out more so than just kills. I feel that a person who gets kills, assists, hacks, and destroys vehicles is better than someone who only gets points from kills, assists, and hacks. So Therefore STB-stlcarlos989 EV >> PDIGGY22. BTW in math terms ">>" means significantly greater than. you cant prove you hack, assist, or any other thing besides kills, more then me. Compare our Kill to WP ratios. As of 11:30pm CST. PDIGGY22: 5,547 kills and 349,454 War Points STB-stlcarlos989 EV: 11,075 kills and 1,030,784 For every kill PDIGGY22 averages 62.9987 War Points For every kill STB-stlcarlos989 EV averages 93.0730 War Points Point proven. that just proves you kill less LOL Actually all it proves is that every time he kills someone, he scores 30 more points than you.
Zeran Haggai Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 196	Posted - 2012.07.28 05:16:00 - [2] - Quote PDIGGY22 wrote: you are really dumb if you dont see his highly flawed math. person A never kills anyone but hacks person B kills a lot and hacks just as much as player A, who's going to average more war points per kill? exactly my point, back to school yo! Your math is equally flawed. By your math, and the deductions you make from it, bigger number=better yes? Scenario: Player A: 20 kills 1000WP Player B: 20 Kills 1500WP Player A only killed other players. He hacked no objectives, killed no vehicles, nothing but killing. Player B hacked 5 objectives in addition to his killing. Using your math player A scores a .02 while player B scores a .013333, which by your math and logic makes player A the better player when he clearly was not.
Zeran Haggai Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 196	Posted - 2012.07.28 05:21:00 - [3] - Quote PDIGGY22 wrote: Zeran Haggai wrote: PDIGGY22 wrote: you are really dumb if you dont see his highly flawed math. person A never kills anyone but hacks person B kills a lot and hacks just as much as player A, who's going to average more war points per kill? exactly my point, back to school yo! Your math is equally flawed. By your math, and the deductions you make from it, bigger number=better yes? Scenario: Player A: 20 kills 1000WP Player B: 20 Kills 1500WP Player A only killed other players. He hacked no objectives, killed no vehicles, nothing but killing. Player B hacked 5 objectives in addition to his killing. Using your math player A scores a .02 while player B scores a .013333, which by your math and logic makes player A the better player when he clearly was not. thats under the assumption i never hack, which is wrong. Turn your brain around and circle back, i do believe you missed the point. Or you didn't and now you're just trolling.
Zeran Haggai Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 196	Posted - 2012.07.28 05:39:00 - [4] - Quote PDIGGY22 wrote: Zeran Haggai wrote: PDIGGY22 wrote: Zeran Haggai wrote: PDIGGY22 wrote: you are really dumb if you dont see his highly flawed math. person A never kills anyone but hacks person B kills a lot and hacks just as much as player A, who's going to average more war points per kill? exactly my point, back to school yo! Your math is equally flawed. By your math, and the deductions you make from it, bigger number=better yes? Scenario: Player A: 20 kills 1000WP Player B: 20 Kills 1500WP Player A only killed other players. He hacked no objectives, killed no vehicles, nothing but killing. Player B hacked 5 objectives in addition to his killing. Using your math player A scores a .02 while player B scores a .013333, which by your math and logic makes player A the better player when he clearly was not. thats under the assumption i never hack, which is wrong. Turn your brain around and circle back, i do believe you missed the point. Or you didn't and now you're just trolling. Fact: i average more kills per war points then anybody in this beta dont care about the rest, we wont be getting any more stats for this build. Fact: That doesn't actually prove you kill more
Zeran Haggai Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 196	Posted - 2012.07.28 05:43:00 - [5] - Quote PDIGGY22 wrote: Fact: learn to read Fact: Your math proves the same amount of nothing as you think everyone elses does
Zeran Haggai Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 196	Posted - 2012.07.28 05:47:00 - [6] - Quote PDIGGY22 wrote: Zeran Haggai wrote: PDIGGY22 wrote: Fact: learn to read Fact: Your math proves the same amount of nothing as you think everyone elses does it proves exactly what I wanted it to prove, thats why i posted it. I know I average more kills per game than anyone in this beta, but there is no way to prove it but using kills per war points makes for a decent indicator. No, it doesn't
Zeran Haggai Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 196	Posted - 2012.07.28 05:55:00 - [7] - Quote PDIGGY22 wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: PDIGGY22 wrote: Fact: i average more kills per war points then anybody in this beta Fact: That means you have a higher percentage of war points from kills than all other actions which earn War Points. Fact: That means you do more killing than anyone else for the amount of non-killing you do. Fact: That still has NO bearing on how valuable you are to your team. Conclusion: Rethink your math, and "learn to read" isn't a fact. i never said any of the above were fact, your an idiot for taking things out of context. Fact: i average the most kills per war points Fact: That still doesn't actually mean anything
Zeran Haggai Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 196	Posted - 2012.07.28 06:18:00 - [8] - Quote PDIGGY22 wrote: where did i ever say it carried a lot of weight? please show... Never said you did, i'm just stating facts. It's not how much or how little weight it carries, because really it doesn't carry any at all. It doesn't prove you kill more than anyone else, it doesn't prove you don't hack objectives either. The only thing it proves with any certainty at all, is that each time you kill someone you score less WP than anyone else on the list.

Copyright © 2013-2024, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,02s, ref 20241122/0735
EVE-Online™/DUST514™ and EVE/DUST514 imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.