|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
   |
Posted - 2012.07.27 02:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
Lolno |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
K. Let's do this. You can limit the tanks if you limit the number of assault rifles and suits. kk? |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:K. Let's do this. You can limit the tanks if you limit the number of assault rifles and suits. kk? why cause you don't have enough skill to match me?
No, because you don't have enough skill to match my tank. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:K. Let's do this. You can limit the tanks if you limit the number of assault rifles and suits. kk? why cause you don't have enough skill to match me? No, because you don't have enough skill to match my tank. tanks 1 hit kill splash damage you literally don't have to aim which = no skill. it's almost like using a rocket launcher in mw2 tbqh with a jug suit.
Ahhhh. Mw2 junkie. Now I see why you don't like vehicles. Sorry this isn't another cod. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
This game wouldn't be half as good if there weren't any vehicles. Not every game can be a run 'n gun game. Vehicles stay, that's for sure. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:This game wouldn't be half as good if there weren't any vehicles. Not every game can be a run 'n gun game. Vehicles stay, that's for sure. did I say I want vehicles eliminated? no just the amount reduced.
Oh ok.
This game wouldn't be half as good if there limits on vehicles. Not every game can be a run 'n gun game. Vehicles stay as is. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:This game wouldn't be half as good if there weren't any vehicles. Not every game can be a run 'n gun game. Vehicles stay, that's for sure. did I say I want vehicles eliminated? no just the amount reduced. Oh ok. This game wouldn't be half as good if there limits on vehicles. Not every game can be a run 'n gun game. Vehicles stay as is. just wait, once a corp moves in (day1) and starts grouping. I'm talking entire matches where they don't get out of there vehicles except for 4 seconds to activate an objective with their unlimited ISK.
That won't happen, because it'd be stupid for the opposing corp to not have an AV squad of some sort. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
Quote:IF YOU WANT A SUCCESFUL GAME YOU NEED TO HAVE NOOBS PLAYING IT. PLAIN AND SIMPLE.
Wrong. That's just cod games. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:Quote:IF YOU WANT A SUCCESFUL GAME YOU NEED TO HAVE NOOBS PLAYING IT. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. Wrong. That's just cod games. you think the average elite player has a **** load of money to dish out? chances are there good at video games because they have time to dedicate because they don't have money to be doing **** IRL.
Did I say that? No. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:35:00 -
[10] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Traynor Youngs wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:
LISTEN TO ME.
IF YOU WANT A SUCCESFUL GAME YOU NEED TO HAVE NOOBS PLAYING IT. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. THIS IS CONSOLE
I KNOW CCP THOUGHT IT WAS CLEVER TO MAKE THIS EFFECT EVE AND MAKE IT ALMOST SUCCESSFUL JUST FROM THAT.
BUT LISTEN TO ME.
NOT.
EVERYONE.
FROM.
EVE.
WILL.
BUY.
A.
PS3.
FOR.
THIS.
GAME.
YOU NEED IT TO BE BALANCED IN ORDER FOR PEOPLE LIKE US TO PLAY! WE WILL GLADLY BE YOUR WORK HORSES FOR A VAST EMPIRE IF THE GAME IS GOOD META GAME MEANS NOTHING IF I CAN'T GET TO THE TOP WITH SKILL
1. STOP YELLING AT ME 2. "Balance" is not what you think it is. Like I said, if you want an ARENA style FPS, go elsewhere. Balance in an sandbox is called balance of opportunity. Not balance of outcome. 3. Meta game is something that you don't even know that you know nothing about. When you are actually leading a campaign of battles to conquer dozens of systems and have hundreds of other real people following your orders, then you can tell me that "SkILL IS KING!" cause it isn't, leadership and metagaming strategy is king, skill is what you tie your shoes with. Skill is the only thing that matters. I, the other good players, the cod players, the battlefield players, the halo players, DO NOT give a $HIT about meta, we want a game that's FUN not a game about taking mindless orders from a leader or a game where strat's and numbers can conquer all, it's not balanced when you have so many numbers we can't protect ourselves, even you must realize that.
They can protect themselves. It's called forges and swarms. |
|
|
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:44:00 -
[11] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Traynor Youngs wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:
I think noobs are going to get pubsmashed while people like me are locked in high sec. and the game will die nearly instantly. just like MAG.
You are forgetting something important. Even if FPS players hate it and quit, this game is tied to Eve. Eve players will use it at least a little bit as long as it affects their bottom line. And Eve players make CCP enough money to be able to grow DUST slowly for a LONG time. This is not a flash in the pan FPS game like CoD black ops or something. CCP have staying power and they won't let it die even is spoiled FPS gamers don't like it. For Christs sake the game is free to download and free to play. I think they are gonna be fine. there gonna be so rich they won't spend money on the game because of their unlimited ISK banks because we = no risk compared to what you can make in EVE in about 14 seconds. they won't buy anything, CCP eventually shuts servers down and put's them towards EVE so you lag less.
Completely illogical. They created Dust to spend and make more off of that extra revenue they don't utilize from Eve. Eve makes soo much revenue that it could possibly support two maybe three more console based games. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:56:00 -
[12] - Quote
Who's this "we" you are talking about? As of now, you are the only one defending this topic. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 04:59:00 -
[13] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:the only reason I have been outnumbered here is simple. there are not that many FPSers that know/give a f*ck about this game to be here with me. I am trying to change this game for the success of CCP.
No I think only a small amount of people agree with you and you are trying to change the game for your wants, not for their success. You probably just got pummled by a few tanks and wanted them nerfed. |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 05:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:I want a balanced game, I do not like levels, or rewards for an in-game buff of anykind, everyone should have a battle rifle and that should be it, no grenades, no running, hacking should be an instant process. BALANCED. So a very boring game? If everyone is that balanced and using the exact same weapon, not sure anyone will stay tbh. it will be competitive! however that will never happen because everyone too noob to make one tbqh. so if I must I will fight until this game is balanced where anyone can kill anyone with more skill than them. OP's last post for tonight ^^
No one here except you wants everyone to use the same weapon. That would get old very quick which is why no one made a game out of it. |
|
|
| |
|