|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 02:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
1 tank per... 12 people I guess for now... but it'd have to be adjusted for when they add bigger game types ofc. 1-12 sounds pretty good actually... |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 02:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sin3 DeusNomine wrote:Ya they need to put limitations per team. 4 vehicles per 12 people man team. Intead of 10 for the whole map. But really they need to take out millitant vehicles for free first otherwise anyone with a decent vehicle will have trouble fielding them. because everyone calling in there millitant crap.
......I hope you weren't serious about 4 vehicles for a 12 man team... the entire team could hide in the tanks. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Might as well limit the number of Heavy Suits you can have on a map, because they're so good at sniping with those Forge Guns. Can't forget about those.
forge guns just need nerfed tbh, maybe antivehicle FOR SURE anti-infantry. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:K. Let's do this. You can limit the tanks if you limit the number of assault rifles and suits. kk?
why cause you don't have enough skill to match me? |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:K. Let's do this. You can limit the tanks if you limit the number of assault rifles and suits. kk? why cause you don't have enough skill to match me? No, because you don't have enough skill to match my tank.
tanks 1 hit kill splash damage you literally don't have to aim which = no skill. it's almost like using a rocket launcher in mw2 tbqh with a jug suit. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:another one of these threads no /thread
this game is just as bad as bf3 on console tbqh, my friends rec'd bf3 cuz it was awesome but on console there's like 9 vehicles for a 10 person team which makes the game SO boring. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Might as well limit the number of Heavy Suits you can have on a map, because they're so good at sniping with those Forge Guns. Can't forget about those. forge guns just need nerfed tbh, maybe antivehicle FOR SURE anti-infantry. not sure if srs forge guns were already nerfed........if u get hit DIRECTLY with something that can take out an armored tank u deserve to die, who the **** dies to forge guns as infantry?
logic and realism is irrelevant in video games. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:10:00 -
[8] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:K. Let's do this. You can limit the tanks if you limit the number of assault rifles and suits. kk? why cause you don't have enough skill to match me? No, because you don't have enough skill to match my tank. tanks 1 hit kill splash damage you literally don't have to aim which = no skill. it's almost like using a rocket launcher in mw2 tbqh with a jug suit. Ahhhh. Mw2 junkie. Now I see why you don't like vehicles. Sorry this isn't another cod.
I'm from every videogame, just stating what it's like, I've played EVE as well and several other MMORPG's I see why you like them I get it but meta gameplay will make this game a failure, you need good gameplay in order to have a good game on console not just meta game like most MMORPGs |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:14:00 -
[9] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Might as well limit the number of Heavy Suits you can have on a map, because they're so good at sniping with those Forge Guns. Can't forget about those. forge guns just need nerfed tbh, maybe antivehicle FOR SURE anti-infantry. not sure if srs forge guns were already nerfed........if u get hit DIRECTLY with something that can take out an armored tank u deserve to die, who the **** dies to forge guns as infantry? logic and realism is irrelevant in video games. never said anything about realism u have to land a direct hit with a forge gun to kill someone, so unless u are standing still u should not be dying to forge gun users tbqh
if a good player picks up a forge he'll end anyone 1v1 |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:This game wouldn't be half as good if there weren't any vehicles. Not every game can be a run 'n gun game. Vehicles stay, that's for sure.
did I say I want vehicles eliminated? no just the amount reduced. |
|
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:16:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:
I'm from every videogame, just stating what it's like, I've played EVE as well and several other MMORPG's I see why you like them I get it but meta gameplay will make this game a failure, you need good gameplay in order to have a good game on console not just meta game like most MMORPGs
So you're saying that console gamers can't handle the meta game? That doesn't seem like a very charitable assessment. Also, I really hope you aren't actually having problems with the militia tanks, because I can strip the shield off a Soma with my CreoDron. Those paper tanks are worthless, and damn easy to kill with pretty much anything.
I've had my ps3 since launch, yes I'm saying console players can't handle meta game. people like you or me that play on console might be able to, but the majority(CoD/BF3 players) will not care for meta game. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:17:00 -
[12] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:another one of these threads no /thread this game is just as bad as bf3 on console tbqh, my friends rec'd bf3 cuz it was awesome but on console there's like 9 vehicles for a 10 person team which makes the game SO boring. play clan matches on bf and then tell me if its boring stop playin lolpubs pubs are boring in every game and the ONLY map that has too many vehicles on BF3 is Operation Firestorm on console if u dont like vehicles u are playing the wrong game plain and simple. Told MAG players that DUST will be heavy on vehicles as well so if u not into it/cant deal with it then its the wrong game u are lookin into
I've played GB's/clan matches in every game, they're BORING if vehicles aren't removed, look at the damn majority of players? do they play clan matches? THAT'S WHAT MAKES A GAME A SUCCESS. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:21:00 -
[13] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:This game wouldn't be half as good if there weren't any vehicles. Not every game can be a run 'n gun game. Vehicles stay, that's for sure. did I say I want vehicles eliminated? no just the amount reduced. Oh ok. This game wouldn't be half as good if there limits on vehicles. Not every game can be a run 'n gun game. Vehicles stay as is.
just wait, once a corp moves in (day1) and starts grouping. I'm talking entire matches where they don't get out of there vehicles except for 4 seconds to activate an objective with their unlimited ISK. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:24:00 -
[14] - Quote
Traynor Youngs wrote:Arbitrary restrictions and rules designed to make things "Fair" and "Balanced" are stupid, gamey, kitchy, (pick your bad adjective) and have no place in a sandbox war game.
As has been said in this thread already, you might as well restrict everything to some kind of "balanced" level, like drop uplinks or nano hives or swarm launchers or heavy machine guns or scout suits or whatever.
If you want an arena balanced arcade shooter, go elsewhere.
We don't want your campy "balance" rule sets in our universe. They are dumb.
If a team wants to use the money to field a tank for everyone, then they should feel free. And if the enemy is worth a dam they will swap into AV setups and drink their tears while slaughtering tanks all day.
The only restriction to how many things you can put down should be how much you can afford to lose.
This is war, not kiddy holdyourhandhappyfuntimes shooter game time. Grow up and fight like an adult or go back to CoD.
LISTEN TO ME.
IF YOU WANT A SUCCESFUL GAME YOU NEED TO HAVE NOOBS PLAYING IT. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. THIS IS CONSOLE
I KNOW CCP THOUGHT IT WAS CLEVER TO MAKE THIS EFFECT EVE AND MAKE IT ALMOST SUCCESSFUL JUST FROM THAT.
BUT LISTEN TO ME.
NOT. EVERYONE. FROM. EVE. WILL. BUY. A. PS3. FOR. THIS. GAME.
YOU NEED IT TO BE BALANCED IN ORDER FOR PEOPLE LIKE US TO PLAY! WE WILL GLADLY BE YOUR WORK HORSES FOR A VAST EMPIRE IF THE GAME IS GOOD META GAME MEANS NOTHING IF I CAN'T GET TO THE TOP WITH SKILL |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:28:00 -
[15] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:Quote:IF YOU WANT A SUCCESFUL GAME YOU NEED TO HAVE NOOBS PLAYING IT. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. Wrong. That's just cod games.
you think the average elite player has a **** load of money to dish out? chances are there good at video games because they have time to dedicate because they don't have money to be doing **** IRL. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:30:00 -
[16] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Traynor Youngs wrote:Arbitrary restrictions and rules designed to make things "Fair" and "Balanced" are stupid, gamey, kitchy, (pick your bad adjective) and have no place in a sandbox war game.
As has been said in this thread already, you might as well restrict everything to some kind of "balanced" level, like drop uplinks or nano hives or swarm launchers or heavy machine guns or scout suits or whatever.
If you want an arena balanced arcade shooter, go elsewhere.
We don't want your campy "balance" rule sets in our universe. They are dumb.
If a team wants to use the money to field a tank for everyone, then they should feel free. And if the enemy is worth a dam they will swap into AV setups and drink their tears while slaughtering tanks all day.
The only restriction to how many things you can put down should be how much you can afford to lose.
This is war, not kiddy holdyourhandhappyfuntimes shooter game time. Grow up and fight like an adult or go back to CoD. LISTEN TO ME. IF YOU WANT A SUCCESFUL GAME YOU NEED TO HAVE NOOBS PLAYING IT. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. THIS IS CONSOLEI KNOW CCP THOUGHT IT WAS CLEVER TO MAKE THIS EFFECT EVE AND MAKE IT ALMOST SUCCESSFUL JUST FROM THAT. BUT LISTEN TO ME. NOT. EVERYONE. FROM. EVE. WILL. BUY. A. PS3. FOR. THIS. GAME. YOU NEED IT TO BE BALANCED IN ORDER FOR PEOPLE LIKE US TO PLAY! WE WILL GLADLY BE YOUR WORK HORSES FOR A VAST EMPIRE IF THE GAME IS GOOD META GAME MEANS NOTHING IF I CAN'T GET TO THE TOP WITH SKILL Yeah, but you can get to the top with skill. I mean, to even get an HAV, you have to be a mediocre player for ages, or be a damn good player and get one rapidly. But it'll still die to two heavies with Forge Guns. Also, the idea isn't for all the EVE players to buy PS3s, its for the noobs to be brought in, get a sense of the scale, and then work to improve their skill in whatever they want to do, to thereby train their skills higher and unlock better equipment. I don't think this game is going to be as much of a turnoff to all new players as you assume it's going to be.
I think noobs are going to get pubsmashed while people like me are locked in high sec. and the game will die nearly instantly. just like MAG. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:33:00 -
[17] - Quote
Traynor Youngs wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:
LISTEN TO ME.
IF YOU WANT A SUCCESFUL GAME YOU NEED TO HAVE NOOBS PLAYING IT. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. THIS IS CONSOLE
I KNOW CCP THOUGHT IT WAS CLEVER TO MAKE THIS EFFECT EVE AND MAKE IT ALMOST SUCCESSFUL JUST FROM THAT.
BUT LISTEN TO ME.
NOT. EVERYONE. FROM. EVE. WILL. BUY. A. PS3. FOR. THIS. GAME.
YOU NEED IT TO BE BALANCED IN ORDER FOR PEOPLE LIKE US TO PLAY! WE WILL GLADLY BE YOUR WORK HORSES FOR A VAST EMPIRE IF THE GAME IS GOOD META GAME MEANS NOTHING IF I CAN'T GET TO THE TOP WITH SKILL
1. STOP YELLING AT ME 2. "Balance" is not what you think it is. Like I said, if you want an ARENA style FPS, go elsewhere. Balance in an sandbox is called balance of opportunity. Not balance of outcome. 3. Meta game is something that you don't even know that you know nothing about. When you are actually leading a campaign of battles to conquer dozens of systems and have hundreds of other real people following your orders, then you can tell me that "SkILL IS KING!" cause it isn't, leadership and metagaming strategy is king, skill is what you tie your shoes with.
Skill is the only thing that matters. I, the other good players, the cod players, the battlefield players, the halo players, DO NOT give a $HIT about meta, we want a game that's FUN not a game about taking mindless orders from a leader or a game where strat's and numbers can conquer all, it's not balanced when you have so many numbers we can't protect ourselves, even you must realize that. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Slightly off topic:
I like you, ALM1GHTY STATIUS.
I don't agree with you, but you aren't afraid to put your viewpoints out there, and you aren't afraid to defend them. We could honestly use more people like that in here to try and offset all the people that just whine. I had you marked as one of them, but you actually seem ok.
lol thanks, I come here after I get bored as **** after computer and console games, my psn is ALM1GHTY_STATIUS add me if you wanna play borderlands cod MAG resistance (battlefield if you must) but I refuse to do anything but keep running at the enemy in BF3 >:( |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:36:00 -
[19] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Traynor Youngs wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:
LISTEN TO ME.
IF YOU WANT A SUCCESFUL GAME YOU NEED TO HAVE NOOBS PLAYING IT. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. THIS IS CONSOLE
I KNOW CCP THOUGHT IT WAS CLEVER TO MAKE THIS EFFECT EVE AND MAKE IT ALMOST SUCCESSFUL JUST FROM THAT.
BUT LISTEN TO ME.
NOT. EVERYONE. FROM. EVE. WILL. BUY. A. PS3. FOR. THIS. GAME.
YOU NEED IT TO BE BALANCED IN ORDER FOR PEOPLE LIKE US TO PLAY! WE WILL GLADLY BE YOUR WORK HORSES FOR A VAST EMPIRE IF THE GAME IS GOOD META GAME MEANS NOTHING IF I CAN'T GET TO THE TOP WITH SKILL
1. STOP YELLING AT ME 2. "Balance" is not what you think it is. Like I said, if you want an ARENA style FPS, go elsewhere. Balance in an sandbox is called balance of opportunity. Not balance of outcome. 3. Meta game is something that you don't even know that you know nothing about. When you are actually leading a campaign of battles to conquer dozens of systems and have hundreds of other real people following your orders, then you can tell me that "SkILL IS KING!" cause it isn't, leadership and metagaming strategy is king, skill is what you tie your shoes with. Skill is the only thing that matters. I, the other good players, the cod players, the battlefield players, the halo players, DO NOT give a $HIT about meta, we want a game that's FUN not a game about taking mindless orders from a leader or a game where strat's and numbers can conquer all, it's not balanced when you have so many numbers we can't protect ourselves, even you must realize that. They can protect themselves. It's called forges and swarms.
I wasn't talking about gameplay for a change, I was talking about meta play. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:39:00 -
[20] - Quote
Traynor Youngs wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:
I think noobs are going to get pubsmashed while people like me are locked in high sec. and the game will die nearly instantly. just like MAG.
You are forgetting something important. Even if FPS players hate it and quit, this game is tied to Eve. Eve players will use it at least a little bit as long as it affects their bottom line. And Eve players make CCP enough money to be able to grow DUST slowly for a LONG time. This is not a flash in the pan FPS game like CoD black ops or something. CCP have staying power and they won't let it die even is spoiled FPS gamers don't like it. For Christs sake the game is free to download and free to play. I think they are gonna be fine.
there gonna be so rich they won't spend money on the game because of their unlimited ISK banks because we = no risk compared to what you can make in EVE in about 14 seconds. they won't buy anything, CCP eventually shuts servers down and put's them towards EVE so you lag less. |
|
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:41:00 -
[21] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Traynor Youngs wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:
LISTEN TO ME.
IF YOU WANT A SUCCESFUL GAME YOU NEED TO HAVE NOOBS PLAYING IT. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. THIS IS CONSOLE
I KNOW CCP THOUGHT IT WAS CLEVER TO MAKE THIS EFFECT EVE AND MAKE IT ALMOST SUCCESSFUL JUST FROM THAT.
BUT LISTEN TO ME.
NOT. EVERYONE. FROM. EVE. WILL. BUY. A. PS3. FOR. THIS. GAME.
YOU NEED IT TO BE BALANCED IN ORDER FOR PEOPLE LIKE US TO PLAY! WE WILL GLADLY BE YOUR WORK HORSES FOR A VAST EMPIRE IF THE GAME IS GOOD META GAME MEANS NOTHING IF I CAN'T GET TO THE TOP WITH SKILL
1. STOP YELLING AT ME 2. "Balance" is not what you think it is. Like I said, if you want an ARENA style FPS, go elsewhere. Balance in an sandbox is called balance of opportunity. Not balance of outcome. 3. Meta game is something that you don't even know that you know nothing about. When you are actually leading a campaign of battles to conquer dozens of systems and have hundreds of other real people following your orders, then you can tell me that "SkILL IS KING!" cause it isn't, leadership and metagaming strategy is king, skill is what you tie your shoes with. Skill is the only thing that matters. I, the other good players, the cod players, the battlefield players, the halo players, DO NOT give a $HIT about meta, we want a game that's FUN not a game about taking mindless orders from a leader or a game where strat's and numbers can conquer all, it's not balanced when you have so many numbers we can't protect ourselves, even you must realize that. I also don't understand why you would define following orders as not being fun. My best games in BF2142 always came with the assistance of a capable Commander. I mean, do you really want to be playing a match with a few hundred people with some arbitrary vehicle count that has most of the group running around on foot to get from place to place? The idea is that vehicles are how you get yourself to facilities and fight for ground along the way, while you're on foot inside, kind of like how they've shown Planetside 2 to operate.
I don't want to have dropships limited. or at least not as much as tanks 1-5 would be fine for dropships, but they need nerf on their turrets first. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:47:00 -
[22] - Quote
Traynor Youngs wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:
Skill is the only thing that matters. I, the other good players, the cod players, the battlefield players, the halo players, DO NOT give a $HIT about meta, we want a game that's FUN not a game about taking mindless orders from a leader or a game where strat's and numbers can conquer all, it's not balanced when you have so many numbers we can't protect ourselves, even you must realize that.
A couple of problems with your argument. False dilemma saying that good players are the ones that play halo/CoD/BF etc. Not a perfect comparison or always true in either sense. Saying good players don't care about meta, again, speak for yourself cause its not always true. Fun, thats true. Saying following orders is not fun is not always true. Have you ever worked as a team under an inspirational leader and accomplished something as a team that you couldn't accomplish alone? It was fun right? Stats and numbers don't conquer all, but skill with understanding the stats and numbers can. Just the way it works in real life. Balance doesn't mean you are always safe from being steamrolled. Balance means that you have a fair chance to steamroll back. Skill is the only thing that matters in stupid gamey arcade shooters. in real life combat (which I have been in) its about skill, intelligence, strategy, intuition, teamwork, blind stupid luck, and a little bit of street smarts. Your arguments are infantile, vague, full of logical loopholes, and unconvincing.
I'm speaking for the majority, and trust me this is what they want. the good FPSers dont care about meta! we just wanna smash the other good players! but we want them to have the same chance we do. I've played countless clan battles in MAG(I figure this is the best example because of a size of 32 v 32) and won many, lead many, and been surprised by victories. in a game that took SKILL to win. real life is irrelevant in video games stats really don't matter because you can be better now, or you could be a huge *** that sits in the red lined turret the entire game and gets a 129 KDR . you can be steamrolled in any blanaced game if the other team is more SKILLFUL than you. why play a game if the only reason I win is because I have better equipment than the other player? again, real life is irrelevant. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 03:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Traynor Youngs wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:
I think noobs are going to get pubsmashed while people like me are locked in high sec. and the game will die nearly instantly. just like MAG.
You are forgetting something important. Even if FPS players hate it and quit, this game is tied to Eve. Eve players will use it at least a little bit as long as it affects their bottom line. And Eve players make CCP enough money to be able to grow DUST slowly for a LONG time. This is not a flash in the pan FPS game like CoD black ops or something. CCP have staying power and they won't let it die even is spoiled FPS gamers don't like it. For Christs sake the game is free to download and free to play. I think they are gonna be fine. there gonna be so rich they won't spend money on the game because of their unlimited ISK banks because we = no risk compared to what you can make in EVE in about 14 seconds. they won't buy anything, CCP eventually shuts servers down and put's them towards EVE so you lag less. You're forgetting something. Planet based colonies, which YOU will be fighting over, produce Starbase fuel. Starbases are both the only means of harvesting moon minerals, which are essential for Tech II production, and holding labs and construction facilities for building their ships and components, AND are the only means to produce Supercarriers and Titans, the largest, most expensive, and most powerful assets in the game We can't AFFORD to ignore you.
IT DOESN'T MATTER! WE DON'T CARE ABOUT META! you don't have to pay us much to keep us running anyways!!!!
edit: this is what you were talking about right? about the nature of EVE? I was busy |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 04:28:00 -
[24] - Quote
Leovarian L Lavitz wrote:Traynor Youngs wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote: real life is irrelevant. In all honesty, this tells me everything I need to know about you and the validity of your opinions. QFT
I'm talking about in video games you idiots -.- |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 04:29:00 -
[25] - Quote
the only reason I have been outnumbered here is simple. there are not that many FPSers that know/give a f*ck about this game to be here with me. I am trying to change this game for the success of CCP. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 04:31:00 -
[26] - Quote
Sin3 DeusNomine wrote:Almighty I do not know why you **** and moan like a little school girl so much.
I do not cry OP about your fully proto gear assault suit set up. Oh no ALMIGHTY spent 10m points to get his ubber assault set up he is OP because I shot him in the back with my advanced rifle with no skills behind it and he turned around and killed me.
It is the same thing someone who spends 10m into the sagaris/surya gets the kills easier. Just like you with your proto suit getting easy kills.
Oh no a tank killed me 2 times I actually have to DIE so something has to be OP in this game.
But yes 3-4 vehicles are a must otherwise you destroy the vehicle gameplay in this game. if a full team wants to go set in 4 sagaris I will happly pop all 4 mine and get 12 quick kills. before you say it is impossible 3 tanks came rolling down on attacking. 2 sagaris 1 surya. I pop out on onside they all come after me I come rolling up from behind all of a sudden 1, 2 , 3. :) 8 kills in the first Min. :)
oh proto gear is OP as **** but if I don't use it some little nub like you will 1 hit splash damage me with a forge gun.
I want a balanced game, I do not like levels, or rewards for an in-game buff of anykind, everyone should have a battle rifle and that should be it, no grenades, no running, hacking should be an instant process. BALANCED. |
ALM1GHTY STATIUS
138
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 04:36:00 -
[27] - Quote
Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:I want a balanced game, I do not like levels, or rewards for an in-game buff of anykind, everyone should have a battle rifle and that should be it, no grenades, no running, hacking should be an instant process. BALANCED. So a very boring game? If everyone is that balanced and using the exact same weapon, not sure anyone will stay tbh.
it will be competitive! however that will never happen because everyone too noob to make one tbqh. so if I must I will fight until this game is balanced where anyone can kill anyone with more skill than them.
OP's last post for tonight ^^ |
|
|
|