| Pages: [1]  :: one page | 
      
      
        | Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  Rue Hadra
 
 31
 
 
      | Posted - 2012.07.26 18:12:00 -
          [1] - Quote 
 I'm really glad we have a little bit of diversity in maps now (I wasn't in the beta the last time these maps were available so there completely new for me) but I'd really like to see some more Skirmish maps.
 
 Ambush is fun, but I primarily play as a sniper and I'm a much bigger fan of objective based games rather than death match style modes, so it would be nice to see some more Skirmish maps in a later update please!
 
 The new maps are great for Assault, but I'm finding them a little awkward for sniping, unless you get lucky and get a lift to a descent spot!
 | 
      
      
        |  Milk Supreme
 ZionTCD
 Legacy Rising
 
 127
 
 
      | Posted - 2012.07.26 18:24:00 -
          [2] - Quote 
 Less Ambush
 
 Nobody plays them anyway!
 | 
      
      
        |  Asno Masamang
 Odd Shadows Inc
 
 122
 
 
      | Posted - 2012.07.26 18:44:00 -
          [3] - Quote 
 Greetings,
 
 Yes, please. 9 Ambush and 3 Skirmish is only really useful to show that more people want Skimish than Ambush... Not uncommon to see 30 - 60ish people (total) playing Ambush and 300 - 600 playing Skirmish.... And now that you guys are putting Biomass and Communication back in, making these available for Skirmish would be really nice...
 
 Or even better, put back in Craterlake and have it determine, based on team actions of course, wether to use Plateus, Biomass, or Communication for phase two. This is what you guys are planning to do in the near future anyway with the dynamic maps
 
 EDIT: Please note that I am not calling for the removal of all of Ambush, just switch the resource allocations around a bit....
 | 
      
      
        |  Forlorn Destrier
 ZionTCD
 Legacy Rising
 
 915
 
 
      | Posted - 2012.07.26 22:55:00 -
          [4] - Quote 
 
 Asno Masamang wrote:Greetings,
 Yes, please. 9 Ambush and 3 Skirmish is only really useful to show that more people want Skimish than Ambush... Not uncommon to see 30 - 60ish people (total) playing Ambush and 300 - 600 playing Skirmish.... And now that you guys are putting Biomass and Communication back in, making these available for Skirmish would be really nice...
 
 Or even better, put back in Craterlake and have it determine, based on team actions of course, wether to use Plateus, Biomass, or Communication for phase two. This is what you guys are planning to do in the near future anyway with the dynamic maps
 
 EDIT: Please note that I am not calling for the removal of all of Ambush, just switch the resource allocations around a bit....
 
 This.
 | 
      
      
        |  Ashihayai
 Villore Sec Ops
 Gallente Federation
 
 5
 
 
      | Posted - 2012.07.27 02:03:00 -
          [5] - Quote 
 
 Forlorn Destrier wrote:Asno Masamang wrote:Greetings,
 Yes, please. 9 Ambush and 3 Skirmish is only really useful to show that more people want Skimish than Ambush... Not uncommon to see 30 - 60ish people (total) playing Ambush and 300 - 600 playing Skirmish.... And now that you guys are putting Biomass and Communication back in, making these available for Skirmish would be really nice...
 
 Or even better, put back in Craterlake and have it determine, based on team actions of course, wether to use Plateus, Biomass, or Communication for phase two. This is what you guys are planning to do in the near future anyway with the dynamic maps
 
 EDIT: Please note that I am not calling for the removal of all of Ambush, just switch the resource allocations around a bit....
 This. Yep. This.
 | 
      
        |  |  | 
      
      
        | Pages: [1]  :: one page | 
      
      
        | First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |