|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nellantar Ballsinya
Royal Uhlans
Amarr Empire
175
   |
Posted - 2012.07.16 20:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Anyone else think that Blasters are a bit under-powered when compared to their Eve-style brothers..?
Yes, the DUST equivalent of EVE blasters is kind of the Forge Gun.
Heck if they even made the sound and projectiles a bit heavier it would work better.
i.e. Instead of RATATATATATATA it sounds more like THOOM THOOM THOOM. |
Nellantar Ballsinya
Royal Uhlans
Amarr Empire
175
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 20:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Shinigami6 Test wrote:
i think he meant the bunkers that you enter and shoot missiles from. if so, i think the way it is now sucks in that if you destroy it its gone forever. but i hear thats only temporary. supposedly, in the future ull be able to call more into the battlefield
... No. |
Nellantar Ballsinya
Royal Uhlans
Amarr Empire
175
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 21:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Nellantar Ballsinya wrote:Shinigami6 Test wrote:
i think he meant the bunkers that you enter and shoot missiles from. if so, i think the way it is now sucks in that if you destroy it its gone forever. but i hear thats only temporary. supposedly, in the future ull be able to call more into the battlefield
... No. This. I was referring very specifically to vehicle/installation turret blasters. No splash damage = Praying to God more than one round lands it's target. I'm sure an Advanced or Prototype blaster would work amazing on a tank, but as it stands they're horrible against anything but. To that degree, Railguns are simply better at anti-vehicular warfare than their Blaster counter-parts. I find this sort of strange considering how under-powered Railguns are in Eve Online, and insanely useful Blasters are by comparison.
I use tier 2 small blasters on my dropships for when there are more vehicles than troops, and I so happen to magically have the 2 good gunners around, and I tear up anything short of a well tanked Sargaris. The railguns projectiles suffer a lot more from motion transfer than the blaster particles. |
Nellantar Ballsinya
Royal Uhlans
Amarr Empire
175
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 21:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:
Large Railguns are pro, mate.
I would totally fit them on my dropship if I could. |
|
|
| |
|