|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aztook nallac
Sanmatar Kelkoons
Minmatar Republic
9
   |
Posted - 2012.07.10 16:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
While this new update has made me really like playing this game, there is one thing I am still not liking.
the end match player scoreboard.
The way the game ranks players as it is right now is Kill/death. which would be fine in ambush, but then in skirmish it gets a lot different.
In skirmish its mostly not about how many kills one gets but how much one hacks into turret firing at the MCC.
Now for me, I don't hack most of the time, but I'm usually in a group protecting the one hacking or firing above from a drop ship or on the secondary turret on a tank.
That leaves me most of the time with kill assists, or helping destroy an enemy vehicle or other things that don't move me up the board but still contribute in many ways on the battle field. That leads me most of the time far down the list with others who are probably in the same boat as me.
This is not a typical FPS, there by we can't base how we score players on typical FPS K/D rules. |
Aztook nallac
Sanmatar Kelkoons
Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 19:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
gangsta nachos wrote:Aztook nallac wrote:While this new update has made me really like playing this game, there is one thing I am still not liking.
the end match player scoreboard.
The way the game ranks players as it is right now is Kill/death. which would be fine in ambush, but then in skirmish it gets a lot different.
In skirmish its mostly not about how many kills one gets but how much one hacks into turret firing at the MCC.
Now for me, I don't hack most of the time, but I'm usually in a group protecting the one hacking or firing above from a drop ship or on the secondary turret on a tank.
That leaves me most of the time with kill assists, or helping destroy an enemy vehicle or other things that don't move me up the board but still contribute in many ways on the battle field. That leads me most of the time far down the list with others who are probably in the same boat as me.
This is not a typical FPS, there by we can't base how we score players on typical FPS K/D rules. So you're mad because you never get first on the list? I don't understand why this bothers you
I do not care about getting first, but recognition for what I do on the battle would be nice, I just think that the system we have now is unfair to those who focus more on objectives, side objectives, and aiding others, then just racking up kills. |
Aztook nallac
Sanmatar Kelkoons
Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 19:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
gangsta nachos wrote:Aztook nallac wrote:gangsta nachos wrote:Aztook nallac wrote:While this new update has made me really like playing this game, there is one thing I am still not liking.
the end match player scoreboard.
The way the game ranks players as it is right now is Kill/death. which would be fine in ambush, but then in skirmish it gets a lot different.
In skirmish its mostly not about how many kills one gets but how much one hacks into turret firing at the MCC.
Now for me, I don't hack most of the time, but I'm usually in a group protecting the one hacking or firing above from a drop ship or on the secondary turret on a tank.
That leaves me most of the time with kill assists, or helping destroy an enemy vehicle or other things that don't move me up the board but still contribute in many ways on the battle field. That leads me most of the time far down the list with others who are probably in the same boat as me.
This is not a typical FPS, there by we can't base how we score players on typical FPS K/D rules. So you're mad because you never get first on the list? I don't understand why this bothers you I do not care about getting first, but recognition for what I do on the battle would be nice, I just think that the system we have now is unfair to those who focus more on objectives, side objectives, and aiding others, then just racking up kills. so you're saying if they changed it the way you wanted it would be unfair to the k/d players since its unfair now. what about the k/d recognition
go by a point system? Every time you do something on the battlefield it tells you +50 when you kill someone or when you do something on the battlefield (+25 for assist, points for hacking ect) So then put those as points up in the final score, add the K/D with the scoreboard next to the point, and then everyone can be happy, but the K/D is secondary, just to show you and other players your K/D, they don't add to your rank, the points are what show your rank, that way it can be fair for everyone. |
Aztook nallac
Sanmatar Kelkoons
Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 20:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Quote:Even if it was changed the people with 40 kills, hacks, assists and what ever will still be on top
then they deserve to be on top because they did the most to help with the battle. |
Aztook nallac
Sanmatar Kelkoons
Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 20:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
gangsta nachos wrote:Aztook nallac wrote:Quote:Even if it was changed the people with 40 kills, hacks, assists and what ever will still be on top then they deserve to be on top because they did the most to help with the battle. So right now as it is you're saying k/d doesn't deserve to be on top because they didn't help the most? You're just assuming because they get alot of kills they they don't hack objectives and help with the battle? I'll tell you right now the way this game is setup with the SP people are not only out for kills they want the most SP possible for more stuff. The only people that fit in this category of k/d not helping would be a sniper.
I'm not assuming anything, but when it comes to the end game wars if all we have to show how great we are on the battle is K/D then people who want to hire us will only look at our K/D not at how good we are with hacking or getting behind enemy lines, or good medics, good demolition, sabator, support, pilot, ect ect ect, I do not assume those with high kills do not also hack or do other jobs on the battle, I do not undermine those who have a good K/D good for them, they helped with the battle, but I think that others who focus solely on certain areas on the battlefield deserve recognition as well and know that they helped with the battle instead of making them feel like that the only way they can be good at this game is to be able to have a good K/D |
|
|
| |
|