DUST Search - Looking for a PC tank game with low specs

TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote:

Scheneighnay McBob wrote:

TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote:

Scheneighnay McBob wrote:

War Thunder.

Universally better than World of Tanks, and the minimum specs are still potato-grade.

That's debatable, AND I wasn't able to run it on the laptop I mentioned before, at least the tanks part... kept crashing.

My old PC was an office PC from around 2004, and it could run War Thunder on minimum settings.
It wasn't until the hard-drive died that I got my current GL 551

Though I remember mixed battles weren't compatible with the minimum settings, only air battles. Still very low minimum specs.

As far as the difference between the 2 games, War Thunder is far more realistic, and allows mixing between vehicle types, if that's something you like, like me.
Though the navy isn't in the main game yet- I participated in the first test for it, which was last weekend. So the naval closed beta will start pretty soon.

Yeah War Thunder is so damn realistic a single RNG shot to your pilot's head kills your entire plane in a frontal confrontation, not to mention the numerous times I killed the insane amount of panzer II's in one shot with a 40mm gun...

Too f*cking realistic, even though guns are far more accurate at range than in World of Tanks, WoT is more arcade-like and generally a lot easier and more fun to play than War Thunder... far more fast-paced too.

Battles last only about 7-10 minutes usually, while in War Thunder, arcade battles can stretch out to half a goddamn hour, and simulator battles go up to an hour or more. F*ck that, ain't got time for that, I got a life to live.

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Swiss Forsaken 0.P. 41	Posted - 2016.11.27 08:23:00 - [1] - Quote Any reccomendations?
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 10608	Posted - 2016.11.27 11:29:00 - [2] - Quote Microsoft Paint. You can draw tanks with Win95 technology. *Scouts United* Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
DAAAA BEAST Corrosive Synergy 4482	Posted - 2016.11.27 14:24:00 - [3] - Quote World of Tanks. Natural sophist. " The class starts when I'm there. "
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken Going for the gold 2864	Posted - 2016.11.27 18:55:00 - [4] - Quote DAAAA BEAST wrote: World of Tanks. ^This. I could run it on a laptop with these specs at roughly 15-20 FPS on lowest settings: 2,1GHz Intel processor (probably dual core but I can't remember) 3Gb RAM Intel HD Graphics card If you have the same specs or anything better than that, you're ready to play WoT. Now I have a proper gaming rig: 3,7GHz Dual Core i3-4170 Intel processor (I thought it was single core, but I just checked and it's dual) 8Gb DDR3 Memory ASUS Strix GeForce GTX950 GPU ^Can run WoT on max settings at a stable 60 FPS. ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) Perverts united. ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°)
Jack Boost Zarena Family 1144	Posted - 2016.11.27 20:11:00 - [5] - Quote Best PC tank game https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scorched_Earth_(video_game) Also if you want play as tank I also recomend you https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Legends and play as tank .. character. Have fun! P.S. This can be things that you search https://crossout.net/en and you can build tank too... Not much time left...
Scheneighnay McBob Penumbra or something 8036	Posted - 2016.11.27 21:23:00 - [6] - Quote War Thunder. Universally better than World of Tanks, and the minimum specs are still potato-grade. Current state of the forums
Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit 3033	Posted - 2016.11.27 21:29:00 - [7] - Quote World of Tanks, War Thunder and Armored Warfare are probably the most recent and all are Free2Play. Sign up for Caldari FW and defeat the evil Gallente Overlords!
Swiss Forsaken 0.P. 42	Posted - 2016.11.28 00:12:00 - [8] - Quote Thanks for the reccommendations guys
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken Going for the gold 2869	Posted - 2016.11.28 08:42:00 - [9] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: War Thunder. Universally better than World of Tanks, and the minimum specs are still potato-grade. That's debatable, AND I wasn't able to run it on the laptop I mentioned before, at least the tanks part... kept crashing. ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) Perverts united. ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°)
Jack Boost Zarena Family 1145	Posted - 2016.11.28 16:18:00 - [10] - Quote Actualy.... Eve online ---> f2p Not much beffed pc needed. Tank fits: plenty armor/skield/speed/electronic.. etc. And soon you can use 'clone' in Nova too :D Not much time left...

Scheneighnay McBob Penumbra or something 8047	Posted - 2016.11.28 19:52:00 - [11] - Quote TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: War Thunder. Universally better than World of Tanks, and the minimum specs are still potato-grade. That's debatable, AND I wasn't able to run it on the laptop I mentioned before, at least the tanks part... kept crashing. My old PC was an office PC from around 2004, and it could run War Thunder on minimum settings. It wasn't until the hard-drive died that I got my current GL 551 Though I remember mixed battles weren't compatible with the minimum settings, only air battles. Still very low minimum specs. As far as the difference between the 2 games, War Thunder is far more realistic, and allows mixing between vehicle types, if that's something you like, like me. Though the navy isn't in the main game yet- I participated in the first test for it, which was last weekend. So the naval closed beta will start pretty soon. Current state of the forums
Scheneighnay McBob Penumbra or something 8047	Posted - 2016.11.28 19:57:00 - [12] - Quote I'll add that War Thunder sortof has Dust's system where deaths matter. Every vehicle but the starting ones has a repair cost, as well as 10 free instant-repairs. If auto-repair is turned off (which I suggest to avoid losing all of your money), you'll either have to pay for the repair, or wait for the free repair timer to finish before you can take that vehicle into another battle. So, if you don't want to lose all of your money or wait through a timer to use your vehicle of choice again, you'll have to be careful to keep it in 1 piece. That's why, when I'm in a plane and I know my team is ******, I just fly back to the airfield while I'm still in tact, land, and leave the battle without losing my plane. Most people don't know that's a thing. Current state of the forums
Lightning35 Delta514 Federation Marines 62 5084	Posted - 2016.11.29 16:08:00 - [13] - Quote World of tanks blitz CEO of Federation Marines 62 - Bravo Company Gallente - Freedom - Quafe - Gk.0s/Gv.0s - 72m SP
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken Going for the gold 2873	Posted - 2016.11.29 20:09:00 - [14] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: War Thunder. Universally better than World of Tanks, and the minimum specs are still potato-grade. That's debatable, AND I wasn't able to run it on the laptop I mentioned before, at least the tanks part... kept crashing. My old PC was an office PC from around 2004, and it could run War Thunder on minimum settings. It wasn't until the hard-drive died that I got my current GL 551 Though I remember mixed battles weren't compatible with the minimum settings, only air battles. Still very low minimum specs. As far as the difference between the 2 games, War Thunder is far more realistic, and allows mixing between vehicle types, if that's something you like, like me. Though the navy isn't in the main game yet- I participated in the first test for it, which was last weekend. So the naval closed beta will start pretty soon. Yeah War Thunder is so damn realistic a single RNG shot to your pilot's head kills your entire plane in a frontal confrontation, not to mention the numerous times I killed the insane amount of panzer II's in one shot with a 40mm gun... Too fcking realistic, even though guns are far more accurate at range than in World of Tanks, WoT is more arcade-like and generally a lot easier and more fun to play than War Thunder... far more fast-paced too. Battles last only about 7-10 minutes usually, while in War Thunder, arcade battles can stretch out to half a goddamn hour, and simulator battles go up to an hour or more. Fck that, ain't got time for that, I got a life to live. ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) Perverts united. ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°) ( -í° -£-û -í°)
LUGMOS Corrosive Synergy RUST415 4700	Posted - 2016.12.02 07:28:00 - [15] - Quote Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: World of tanks blitz What's your IGN? Mine's HP_FiSH. I play that game a tonne. I am the Anti-FoTM Fear my Cal Assault and Amarr Scout!
Lightning35 Delta514 Federation Marines 62 5084	Posted - 2016.12.04 16:02:00 - [16] - Quote LUGMOS wrote: Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: World of tanks blitz What's your IGN? Mine's HP_FiSH. I play that game a tonne. Jose_18x Cuz currently have T110E5, Pershing, T25/2, T25 AT, and M7. Working towards M48 Patton, T110E3/4, and T57. CEO of Federation Marines 62 - Bravo Company Gallente - Freedom - Quafe - Gk.0s/Gv.0s - 72m SP
Scheneighnay McBob Penumbra or something 8049	Posted - 2016.12.05 02:08:00 - [17] - Quote TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: War Thunder. Universally better than World of Tanks, and the minimum specs are still potato-grade. That's debatable, AND I wasn't able to run it on the laptop I mentioned before, at least the tanks part... kept crashing. My old PC was an office PC from around 2004, and it could run War Thunder on minimum settings. It wasn't until the hard-drive died that I got my current GL 551 Though I remember mixed battles weren't compatible with the minimum settings, only air battles. Still very low minimum specs. As far as the difference between the 2 games, War Thunder is far more realistic, and allows mixing between vehicle types, if that's something you like, like me. Though the navy isn't in the main game yet- I participated in the first test for it, which was last weekend. So the naval closed beta will start pretty soon. Yeah War Thunder is so damn realistic a single RNG shot to your pilot's head kills your entire plane in a frontal confrontation, not to mention the numerous times I killed the insane amount of panzer II's in one shot with a 40mm gun... Too fcking realistic, even though guns are far more accurate at range than in World of Tanks, WoT is more arcade-like and generally a lot easier and more fun to play than War Thunder... far more fast-paced too. Battles last only about 7-10 minutes usually, while in War Thunder, arcade battles can stretch out to half a goddamn hour, and simulator battles go up to an hour or more. Fck that, ain't got time for that, I got a life to live. If you fly a head-on, you better be prepared to die, because it's an extremely stupid maneuver. Even if you do shoot down the enemy plane, you can still catch a chunk of their plane and go down with them. As for battle time- I play almost exclusively in realistic, and battles tend to average around 20 minutes. Current state of the forums


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

I am the Anti-FoTM