|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
332
|
Posted - 2016.02.21 19:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Alena Asakura wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:This is the original term in regards to gaming. http://www.sirlin.net/ptw-book/introducingthe-scrubIt is loosely defined as an individual who entraps themselves inside of a mental barrier of excuses whenever they lose, instead of assessing with they did wrong and how they can improve. To be called a scrub is not necessarily insult, but more of a direct classification of where they are mentally in regards to competition. Almost everyone starts at scrub status and, with luck, happens upon a breaking point where they become self-aware of the condition and break out of it. Of course, the current generation of gamers has no sense of history in regards to the word so they use it blindly as an insult with no meaning. That's not my definition of a scrub. To me a scrub is a disgusting exploit player that will do anything to win. CCP has either accidentally or deliberately put certain things in the game that are "supposed" to be for one purpose but are used as exploits to gain advantage in the game, fostering FOTM followers. An almost perfect example is the jumpy myofibs. They were supposedly meant to allow people to jump on top of things rather than use a dropship. If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you over a swamp. There is no way that CCP would not have known that this would be exploited by all sorts of really obnoxious characters that will find a way to use it for advantage. And so it is, that heavies with mass drivers and assaults with shotguns are gaining ridiculously unbelievable advantage, which simply cannot be countered. CCP has fostered these scrubs. Someone at CCP seems to really like messing up games like EvE and Dust, interfering with the mechanics and creating the very FOTM garbage they say they want to avoid. To me, scrubs are the lowest of the low - dirty players that will do anything to win and follow whatever FOTM is currently fulfilling that desire in all their fellow scrubs. I refuse to play that game, and it makes this game so much harder for me, but I would stop playing rather than participate. Luckily THIS game is finished and I won't have to put up with this for much longer.
Spoken like a true scrub.
Myos are bad because they kill you.
"Real" skill means not using jump mods.
You don't have to play a game with rules you don't like. But when you make up your own rules and get mad at people who don't recognize your own rule set then you are a scrub.
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
333
|
Posted - 2016.02.21 19:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Alena Asakura wrote:. There are some matches where leaving the match is my statement of disgust at the scrubbery of the red players.
Aka I leave battle when I am getting my ass kicked. Because the other players are bad.
Do you say this stuff out loud before you type it?
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
336
|
Posted - 2016.02.22 15:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alena Asakura wrote: That's right I don't have to play a game I don't like and when I encounter this vermin, I usually leave the match. If I stay it's to see if I can find a way to make some progress regardless of their ridiculous tactics, usually using one of my BPO fits, which they hate because they're inexpensive and therefore they don't really do me any damage.
You are both missing my point, and further clarifying that you are in fact a scrub.
You may not like it, I may not like it, but jumpy mass drivers are here, they are within the rules, and people will and should use them.
The difference between us is that I don't call someone a name for playing within the rules. They are not ruining the game. They are trying to win, which is a hell of a lot more than you do.
If I had to choose between you and any other blue dot, you would be sitting on the bench, because no one who wants to win wants people with a bunch of e-honour constructs on their team.
You keep making up your own rules, and still losing, should make for tons of fun in whatever game you take your toxic mindset to next.
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
337
|
Posted - 2016.02.22 16:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:]
I would argue that your attitude is toxic, not their opinion. You can disagree with someone's opinion without the conversation devolving to what you just did.
Pretty sure I am well established as an *******. Should be a orange tag under my name.
Doesn't change the fact that sparky needs to either alter his mindset or change games. Or be happy as a casual.
Would you not heap scorn upon someone who showed up to a track meet barefoot and calling those in shoes scrubs after they lose?
What would you do if you were sitting at a table, and the person across called you scum for putting hotels on the Oranges after free parking? Would you give them a polite dissertation on the structures of rules and the affirmative consent of starting to play a game under said rules? Or would you ask them if they were special then tell them to enjoy playing the new solo monopoly at their own house?
It takes a village to raise a child, and not everyone needs to be supportive.
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
338
|
Posted - 2016.02.22 17:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:Press Attache wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:]
I would argue that your attitude is toxic, not their opinion. You can disagree with someone's opinion without the conversation devolving to what you just did. Pretty sure I am well established as an *******. Should be a orange tag under my name. Doesn't change the fact that sparky needs to either alter his mindset or change games. Or be happy as a casual. Would you not heap scorn upon someone who showed up to a track meet barefoot and calling those in shoes scrubs after they lose? What would you do if you were sitting at a table, and the person across called you scum for putting hotels on the Oranges after free parking? Would you give them a polite dissertation on the structures of rules and the affirmative consent of starting to play a game under said rules? Or would you ask them if they were special then tell them to enjoy playing the new solo monopoly at their own house? It takes a village to raise a child, and not everyone needs to be supportive. I'm not talking about him - I'm talking about you. You should change your mindset. Your toxicity is one of the reasons these forums are horrible to visit.
Look, you want to run around putting helmets on everyone and making sure their mittens are tied up tight, you go right ahead.
I'll open the door and let the ones who can't figure out clothing freeze to death.
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
338
|
Posted - 2016.02.22 17:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
noob cavman wrote:I didn't like jumping mass driver's. Nor the frame rate drops in general. So I moved on.
Its not ******* difficult guy's.
I'm saying.
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
344
|
Posted - 2016.02.23 00:29:00 -
[7] - Quote
Summa Militum wrote:Press Attache wrote:Alena Asakura wrote: That's right I don't have to play a game I don't like and when I encounter this vermin, I usually leave the match. If I stay it's to see if I can find a way to make some progress regardless of their ridiculous tactics, usually using one of my BPO fits, which they hate because they're inexpensive and therefore they don't really do me any damage.
You are both missing my point, and further clarifying that you are in fact a scrub. You may not like it, I may not like it, but jumpy mass drivers are here, they are within the rules, and people will and should use them. The difference between us is that I don't call someone a name for playing within the rules. They are not ruining the game. They are trying to win, which is a hell of a lot more than you do. If I had to choose between you and any other blue dot, you would be sitting on the bench, because no one who wants to win wants people with a bunch of e-honour constructs on their team. You keep making up your own rules, and still losing, should make for tons of fun in whatever game you take your toxic mindset to next. Shut the **** up you disgusting scrub. You use the myofib mass driver combo not because you are trying to win a match but because you have **** for gungame and have to resort to an easy mode tactic to make yourself feel better about yourself.
Except I don't even have mass drivers skilled into, and never have. I find explosive area of effect weapons to be pretty limp wristed.
However, just I don't use them, doesn't mean I call people who do scrubs.
Thanks for making ridiculous assumptions though.
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
346
|
Posted - 2016.02.23 00:50:00 -
[8] - Quote
noob cavman wrote:But you have used 700+ armour gal assault XD. And im called noob!?
Bro, do you even stack complex plates?
I think I had 900 armour on there at one point, before I skilled into reps.
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
346
|
Posted - 2016.02.23 14:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
Alena Asakura wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:Excuse me while I laugh my ass off at the idea that something is in the game because "It suits one of the CPM's to have it there."
Jesus I haven't laughed that hard in a while.
Thanks for the giggle. Breakin, laugh all you like. It won't change the fact that this game is becoming less and less enjoyable for people who try to play fairly. For the record, I said "someone" not "one of". For all I know it could be all of CPM that thinks these disgusting tactics are fine. CPM tends to be fairly advanced players who advocate what they believe to be good things for the game. This becomes a problem with they lose sight of things like NPE, which is crucial for increasing player numbers. As I've said before, it's just as well this game is ending. I'll add that in its present form it would not likely last too much longer. The fact that pubs have degenerated into an all out slug fest for proto players, with stomping now being condoned in the name of burning everything before the end, says something. Why are they in pubs? Why not in FW where at least the opponents would put up a fair fight? No, they're in pubs where they can slaughter everyone that can't afford proto gear or doesn't have the skills for it. Where else are noobs to go? FW is all but shut down because all the protos have now joined the pub stompers. That doesn't have much to do with "scrubbery" other than the tactics that are being used, but the fact that these twerps are slaughtering near defenseless noobs probably would fit my own definition of "scrubbery". It's pathetic.
"People who play fairly" aka losers.
Do you not shoot other players in the back? That would be unfair.
Put an re on a wall and run around a corner to bait someone? Totally unfair.
Dropping an OB? Unfair.
Did you invest SP into suits and weapons? Congrats, now you can't shoot starter fits, that wouldn't be fair.
Don't you see how your silly ruleset ruins more than it helps?
You are playing a competitive lobby shooter and complaining because people won't give you duels at sunset with pistols and paces.
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
346
|
Posted - 2016.02.23 14:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
Alena Asakura wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:Alena Asakura wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:Just because we may or may not like something does not mean the devs will go with our suggestions for, or to the contrary.
This delusion people have that we somehow are allowed to dictate game balance and development is almost adorable in it's naivete. The game speaks for itself. It's less and less enjoyable every day. You think that conforms to the concept of CCP or CPM wanting what's good for the game? It may be good for certain people who benefit from it, not for the poor cannon fodder that are being blasted in pubs. That's nice, have a cookie. It's the same cookie we've all been nibbling on since 2014, so it's a little stale. might take some getting used to. If you want to make the game better, go earn the skills to become a developer and do better. Your attitude speaks volumes. You see nothing wrong with the way the game is going. You deserve the game to die.
The game was dead before you even downloaded it.
It's funny that you whine like a girl about jumpy mass drivers. If you had seen the flaylock in its prime you wouldn't have lasted a week.
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
|
Press Attache
The Office of The Attorney General
350
|
Posted - 2016.02.24 04:51:00 -
[11] - Quote
Alena Asakura wrote:Press Attache wrote:Alena Asakura wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:Excuse me while I laugh my ass off at the idea that something is in the game because "It suits one of the CPM's to have it there."
Jesus I haven't laughed that hard in a while.
Thanks for the giggle. Breakin, laugh all you like. It won't change the fact that this game is becoming less and less enjoyable for people who try to play fairly. For the record, I said "someone" not "one of". For all I know it could be all of CPM that thinks these disgusting tactics are fine. CPM tends to be fairly advanced players who advocate what they believe to be good things for the game. This becomes a problem with they lose sight of things like NPE, which is crucial for increasing player numbers. As I've said before, it's just as well this game is ending. I'll add that in its present form it would not likely last too much longer. The fact that pubs have degenerated into an all out slug fest for proto players, with stomping now being condoned in the name of burning everything before the end, says something. Why are they in pubs? Why not in FW where at least the opponents would put up a fair fight? No, they're in pubs where they can slaughter everyone that can't afford proto gear or doesn't have the skills for it. Where else are noobs to go? FW is all but shut down because all the protos have now joined the pub stompers. That doesn't have much to do with "scrubbery" other than the tactics that are being used, but the fact that these twerps are slaughtering near defenseless noobs probably would fit my own definition of "scrubbery". It's pathetic. "People who play fairly" aka losers. Do you not shoot other players in the back? That would be unfair. Put an re on a wall and run around a corner to bait someone? Totally unfair. Dropping an OB? Unfair. Did you invest SP into suits and weapons? Congrats, now you can't shoot starter fits, that wouldn't be fair. Don't you see how your silly ruleset ruins more than it helps? You are playing a competitive lobby shooter and complaining because people won't give you duels at sunset with pistols and paces. At the risk of perpetuating this pointless discussion any further, when I really want to turn my back on the whole sorry mess, I feel I do need to answer at least these points. There is a gradation of "fairness". It's said "All's fair in love and war". But I guess I would look rather to what is ethical rather than simply the subjective concept of fairness. Yes, people who play fairly are seen as losers to a vast number of people these days, probably the majority. I count myself as one of these "losers", and quite proudly. I'd rather be a loser by playing fairly than a winner by any means available. That said, I'm hardly "losing", with close on 200m ISK and over 20m SP in only 8 months. I have 4 State LP suits paid for by earning them in CFW, and 2 State LP skins to go with them, which can only be earnt, not bought, as they're not transferable. Yes I shoot other players in the back as they do me. Yes it's "unfair" by some sets of rules, but in warfare, it's not. Again, that saying "All's fair in love and war" comes up. But there's no ridiculous advantage here - all I have is a weapon, often a militia one, Caldari only (because that's another of the ridiculous rules I've imposed on myself) and a fleeing target, usually someone who fired at me first and then runs because I'm beating them. I've never used REs to bait anyone. Yes, that's unfair but it's a valid tactic, scrubby though it may be. I've fallen for it many times, but have learnt to see the signs, and avoid following people for that reason. OB? Orbital strike? Not sure what that is, but if it's an orbital strike, then as far as I can see it's unfair when it's bought with AUR, which to me contributes to the pay-to-win aspect of this game. Yes, I bought one once, to see how to deploy it. I don't think I killed anyone with it. Yes, of course I invested SP into suits and weapons, but primarily into core skills which make all suits, weapons, modules and equipment better. Yes, I shoot starter fits, or at least I assume I do, but I wouldn't know because I don't exactly make a habit of checking first to see whether I can shoot them or not since they're usually shooting me, and if I don't shoot back, I'll die. In any case I mostly run starter MLT suits myself anyway. I find them fast, flexible, cheap (obviously) and totally adequate to what I do. I don't mind dying and have no KDR obsession like most seem to. I'm usually the one making the suicide run to take out some of the enemy camping the point when everyone else is either hiding in the shadows or sitting on a hill with a sniper rifle. You can do that quite well in a MLT suit, you know, and it costs almost nothing. As for my ruleset "ruining" more than it helps, no, it doesn't. It actually makes me a better player than I would be if I allowed myself to follow the easy road. Players that stick to a purpose and resolutely follow a plan to excel in whatever they choose will ultimately be better than players that do FOTM or easy road. At the end of the day, when they nerf whatever is FOTM, I'll still have my skills in my chosen race and racial weaponry. I will continue to play by my rules and leave matches whenever I encounter the sort of garbage that uses scrubby tactics. I refuse to add to their kills, at least any more than the one they get me with. They can rail against that all they like. If they nerf being able to leave matches, I'll simply stop playing. That will always be my ultimate answer to this game if it gets too ridiculous and disgusting.
Look at the ridiculous mental contortions a scrub has to go through.
Just absurd.
Forum representative for Mr. Hybrid Vayu: The Attorney General.
|
|
|
|