|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Corporation
3
   |
Posted - 2016.02.10 02:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Murder Medic wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Whilst most of the points noted by the PCMR crowd in this thread are true, in a 'competitive' game with a 'persistent' universe it is also immensely more vulnerable to hackers. So why isn't EVE plagued with hacks?
I guess Eve doesn't need aimbots, did it? There is a certain line you know you should not cross when hacking a game, and almost any possible "hack" in Eve is crossing that line: infinite isks is easily trackable, and same goes for infinite health or, I don't know, instant mining? I'm not saying there is no way to hack Eve, I just feel like it is way too difficult and risky compared to the "reward".
In an fps, especially in f2p, it's different. Think about aimbots. They are a pretty common hack and works wonderfully if you use them with caution.
Although there is no hack for eve, anyway, there are (or have been, not sure on that actually) many "cheats" involving third party softwares... and anyone who played eve should know what I'm saying-
We just have to hope that CCP have a strong anti-cheat system, otherwise...
take time or take aurums (Gò»#-_-)Gò»~~~GòºGòÉGòº [FSTNM SCDNM]
#PortDust514
|
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Corporation
3
|
Posted - 2016.02.10 03:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Aidualc wrote:4lbert Wesker wrote:60 fps
1080p at 60 fps
superior graphics on 1080p at 60 fps
Anything else console peasant? The human eye only perceive 24-30 FPS... Yea, you have no idea what you're talking about.
This is untrue afaik: human eyes can perceive a much wider range of "fps". Last time I've read something about it it was at like 150 - 200 fps to clearly perceive an image. Might be higher for some people, lower for others.
The problem here is much more complicated than a simple "there's no need to go beyond x fps because I wouldn't perceive the difference anyway". It's actually really complicated, but the simple thing to test it is:
Watch this gif. Can you see any difference between 30 fps and 60 fps? if so, great! You just answered yourself!
take time or take aurums (Gò»#-_-)Gò»~~~GòºGòÉGòº [FSTNM SCDNM]
#PortDust514
|
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Corporation
3
|
Posted - 2016.02.10 04:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Aidualc wrote:4lbert Wesker wrote:60 fps
1080p at 60 fps
superior graphics on 1080p at 60 fps
Anything else console peasant? The human eye only perceive 24-30 FPS... Yea, you have no idea what you're talking about. This is untrue afaik: human eyes can perceive a much wider range of "fps". Last time I've read something about it it was at like 150 - 200 fps to clearly perceive an image. Might be higher for some people, lower for others. The problem here is much more complicated than a simple "there's no need to go beyond x fps because I wouldn't perceive the difference anyway". It's actually really complicated, but the simple thing to test it is: Watch this gif. Can you see any difference between 30 fps and 60 fps? if so, great! You just answered yourself! You know, I hate it when I look up Google for articles or journals posted by experienced medical professionals to see what they found to be the fasted that the human eye can perceive in terms of frame rates. BUT NOOOOOOOO I keep running into nothing but video game websites with people posting seemingly conflicting information on what are the estimates. Isn't there a single professional article or medical journal describing in detail what's going on?
Well, I think this is not so "interesting" for the scientific community perhaps, don't know. The very least you can do to test yourself is to make a short video, put inside the video one frame with an image or just a blank frame and then play the video at different framerates.
take time or take aurums (Gò»#-_-)Gò»~~~GòºGòÉGòº [FSTNM SCDNM]
#PortDust514
|
|
|
| |
|