DUST Search - Vehicles finally got fixed!!!

Thumb Green wrote:

Takahiro Kashuken wrote:

Well a person outside a vehicle on top of a building can deny vehicles to a larger area than the vehicle on the ground.

Vehicles in general were around to combat other vehicles, give 1 person a equal footing with a surya then what use is the vehicle?

Falls on deaf ears anyways because CCP never did listen and they still wont hence how vehicles lost everything which was actually useful and made vehicles intresting to use.

The one guy in a tank (because that's all you really care about) is also immune to the majority of weapons in this game which the one guy in just a suit isn't, even swarms can hurt them in the off chance they get in the way of an enemies volley. It took and takes a larger percentage of an AV weapon's ammo to kill a tank, apposed to the percentage of ammo it takes for most infantry & vehicle weapons to kill infantry. AV infantry is also more vulnerable to other infantry than non-AV infantry.

You say "in general were around to combat other vehicles" and yet in general they've been used to farm infantry. Even when tanks were demi-gods compared to IAV and the only reliable way to take them down was another tank (when CCP actually listened to the likes of you and Spkr on AV vs V), they were mostly used to farm infantry.

CCP Rattati - "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have got to be kidding...''

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. 4	Posted - 2016.02.04 20:20:00 - [1] - Quote By deleting the game because they didnt have a ******* clue. CCP Rattati - "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have got to be kidding...''
Soldner VonKuechle SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance 2	Posted - 2016.02.04 20:32:00 - [2] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: By deleting the game because they didnt have a ******* clue. I liked it better when your insufferable personality wasn't goobering around the forums. You had good ideas, but the butthurt from them not being implemented... End the forums now! It's the only way to keep Taka silent. :) Like usual, the forums went full r-tard with the news.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. 4	Posted - 2016.02.04 20:38:00 - [3] - Quote Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: By deleting the game because they didnt have a ******* clue. I liked it better when your insufferable personality wasn't goobering around the forums. You had good ideas, but the butthurt from them not being implemented... End the forums now! It's the only way to keep Taka silent. :) Idgaf what you think tbh fam. Does not matter if i had good ideas or not, CCP consistantly implemented bad ones and dont worry i will be around to shitpost on the next game whatever it happens to be called. CCP Rattati - "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have got to be kidding...''
Daemon Ceyd SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance 0	Posted - 2016.02.04 20:48:00 - [4] - Quote Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: By deleting the game because they didnt have a ******* clue. I liked it better when your insufferable personality wasn't goobering around the forums. You had good ideas, but the butthurt from them not being implemented... End the forums now! It's the only way to keep Taka silent. :) Kuech! Where did the corp forums go?!? We should get back on PS3 and Dust! I'll even set up my capture gear!
Soldner VonKuechle SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance 2	Posted - 2016.02.04 20:54:00 - [5] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: By deleting the game because they didnt have a ******* clue. I liked it better when your insufferable personality wasn't goobering around the forums. You had good ideas, but the butthurt from them not being implemented... End the forums now! It's the only way to keep Taka silent. :) Idgaf what you think tbh fam. Does not matter if i had good ideas or not, CCP consistantly implemented bad ones and dont worry i will be around to shitpost on the next game whatever it happens to be called. As long as you drive a vehicle for me to shoot, ill look forward to it. Like usual, the forums went full r-tard with the news.
Soldner VonKuechle SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance 2	Posted - 2016.02.04 20:54:00 - [6] - Quote Daemon Ceyd wrote: Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: By deleting the game because they didnt have a ******* clue. I liked it better when your insufferable personality wasn't goobering around the forums. You had good ideas, but the butthurt from them not being implemented... End the forums now! It's the only way to keep Taka silent. :) Kuech! Where did the corp forums go?!? We should get back on PS3 and Dust! I'll even set up my capture gear! Uhh, they still should be there. And yes, officer blow out is a must. Like usual, the forums went full r-tard with the news.
Thumb Green Elephant Riders 2	Posted - 2016.02.04 20:57:00 - [7] - Quote And afterwards Spkr will still be bitching about how op a single merc with militia swarms is. It was both infuriating and fun while it lasted.
DEATH DEALER 1975 KILL-EM-QUICK Rise Of Legion. 34	Posted - 2016.02.04 21:40:00 - [8] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: By deleting the game because they didnt have a ******* clue. +1
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. 4	Posted - 2016.02.04 21:40:00 - [9] - Quote Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: By deleting the game because they didnt have a ******* clue. I liked it better when your insufferable personality wasn't goobering around the forums. You had good ideas, but the butthurt from them not being implemented... End the forums now! It's the only way to keep Taka silent. :) Idgaf what you think tbh fam. Does not matter if i had good ideas or not, CCP consistantly implemented bad ones and dont worry i will be around to shitpost on the next game whatever it happens to be called. As long as you drive a vehicle for me to shoot, ill look forward to it. What makes you think there will be vehicles in the next game if they couldnt do it right in this one? CCP Rattati - "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have got to be kidding...''
Thumb Green Elephant Riders 2	Posted - 2016.02.04 22:49:00 - [10] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: By deleting the game because they didnt have a ******* clue. I liked it better when your insufferable personality wasn't goobering around the forums. You had good ideas, but the butthurt from them not being implemented... End the forums now! It's the only way to keep Taka silent. :) Idgaf what you think tbh fam. Does not matter if i had good ideas or not, CCP consistantly implemented bad ones and dont worry i will be around to shitpost on the next game whatever it happens to be called. As long as you drive a vehicle for me to shoot, ill look forward to it. What makes you think there will be vehicles in the next game if they couldnt do it right in this one? Because they haven't made a game that doesn't involve vehicles in some form. But your version of doing it right either means infantry AV is only a nuisance to vehicles or requiring half the team to take down one vehicle, so you'll never be happy with how they do it. Should just stick to world of tanks, man. It was both infuriating and fun while it lasted.

Derpty Derp Dead Man's Game 1	Posted - 2016.02.04 23:08:00 - [11] - Quote The biggest problem with vehicles were the maps and the ****** redzone... Here's to hoping for a wider playing area in the sequel!
Medical Crash Systematic Engineers Unlimited 497	Posted - 2016.02.04 23:11:00 - [12] - Quote If CCP would have put that damn All-Purpose Spud Launcher I asked to be put in, then tanks would never have been a problem. Mankinds toughest issues through the centuries have have fixed by potatoes. Tru stori My YouTube Channel
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. 4	Posted - 2016.02.04 23:27:00 - [13] - Quote Thumb Green wrote: Because they haven't made a game that doesn't involve vehicles in some form. But your version of doing it right either means infantry AV is only a nuisance to vehicles or requiring half the team to take down one vehicle, so you'll never be happy with how they do it. Should just stick to world of tanks, man. Chrome was fine, vehicles were fine and AV hit hard but asking for 1 AV to 1 vehicle espc if that vehicle was a marauder such as a Surya then every other vehicle which is not a tank will get hammered in 1 shot which then makes vehicles pointless if 1 person can do what a vehicle can. CCP Rattati - "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have got to be kidding...''
CrotchGrab 360 TasteTheTamsen 2	Posted - 2016.02.04 23:38:00 - [14] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Thumb Green wrote: Because they haven't made a game that doesn't involve vehicles in some form. But your version of doing it right either means infantry AV is only a nuisance to vehicles or requiring half the team to take down one vehicle, so you'll never be happy with how they do it. Should just stick to world of tanks, man. Chrome was fine, vehicles were fine and AV hit hard but asking for 1 AV to 1 vehicle espc if that vehicle was a marauder such as a Surya then every other vehicle which is not a tank will get hammered in 1 shot which then makes vehicles pointless if 1 person can do what a vehicle can. yes 1 person outside a vehicle can do what 1 person inside a vehicle can do. you say "what a vehicle can" but you really mean "what a person inside a vehicle can" you seem to be forgetting that. anyway at least even if/when you will be trolling on the new forums it will fall on deaf ears because everyone knows to not listen to you. YOUTUBE
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. 4	Posted - 2016.02.04 23:41:00 - [15] - Quote CrotchGrab 360 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Thumb Green wrote: Because they haven't made a game that doesn't involve vehicles in some form. But your version of doing it right either means infantry AV is only a nuisance to vehicles or requiring half the team to take down one vehicle, so you'll never be happy with how they do it. Should just stick to world of tanks, man. Chrome was fine, vehicles were fine and AV hit hard but asking for 1 AV to 1 vehicle espc if that vehicle was a marauder such as a Surya then every other vehicle which is not a tank will get hammered in 1 shot which then makes vehicles pointless if 1 person can do what a vehicle can. yes 1 person outside a vehicle can do what 1 person inside a vehicle can do. you say "what a vehicle can" but you really mean "what a person inside a vehicle can" you seem to be forgetting that. anyway at least even if/when you will be trolling on the new forums it will fall on deaf ears because everyone knows to not listen to you. Well a person outside a vehicle on top of a building can deny vehicles to a larger area than the vehicle on the ground. Vehicles in general were around to combat other vehicles, give 1 person a equal footing with a surya then what use is the vehicle? Falls on deaf ears anyways because CCP never did listen and they still wont hence how vehicles lost everything which was actually useful and made vehicles intresting to use. CCP Rattati - "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have got to be kidding...''
Atiim Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State 16	Posted - 2016.02.05 00:49:00 - [16] - Quote Shut up already. The game's literally over; find something else to complain about for once. The 1st Matari Commando -HAND
Thumb Green Elephant Riders 2	Posted - 2016.02.05 01:00:00 - [17] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Well a person outside a vehicle on top of a building can deny vehicles to a larger area than the vehicle on the ground. Vehicles in general were around to combat other vehicles, give 1 person a equal footing with a surya then what use is the vehicle? Falls on deaf ears anyways because CCP never did listen and they still wont hence how vehicles lost everything which was actually useful and made vehicles intresting to use. The one guy in a tank (because that's all you really care about) is also immune to the majority of weapons in this game which the one guy in just a suit isn't, even swarms can hurt them in the off chance they get in the way of an enemies volley. It took and takes a larger percentage of an AV weapon's ammo to kill a tank, apposed to the percentage of ammo it takes for most infantry & vehicle weapons to kill infantry. AV infantry is also more vulnerable to other infantry than non-AV infantry. You say "in general were around to combat other vehicles" and yet in general they've been used to farm infantry. Even when tanks were demi-gods compared to IAV and the only reliable way to take them down was another tank (when CCP actually listened to the likes of you and Spkr on AV vs V), they were mostly used to farm infantry. It was both infuriating and fun while it lasted.
Derpty Derp Dead Man's Game 1	Posted - 2016.02.05 02:33:00 - [18] - Quote Atiim wrote: Shut up already. The game's literally over; find something else to complain about for once. But, if we don't get it out of our systems now... Then we'll have that "what if" feeling forever!
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. 4	Posted - 2016.02.05 12:52:00 - [19] - Quote Thumb Green wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Well a person outside a vehicle on top of a building can deny vehicles to a larger area than the vehicle on the ground. Vehicles in general were around to combat other vehicles, give 1 person a equal footing with a surya then what use is the vehicle? Falls on deaf ears anyways because CCP never did listen and they still wont hence how vehicles lost everything which was actually useful and made vehicles intresting to use. The one guy in a tank (because that's all you really care about) is also immune to the majority of weapons in this game which the one guy in just a suit isn't, even swarms can hurt them in the off chance they get in the way of an enemies volley. It took and takes a larger percentage of an AV weapon's ammo to kill a tank, apposed to the percentage of ammo it takes for most infantry & vehicle weapons to kill infantry. AV infantry is also more vulnerable to other infantry than non-AV infantry. You say "in general were around to combat other vehicles" and yet in general they've been used to farm infantry. Even when tanks were demi-gods compared to IAV and the only reliable way to take them down was another tank (when CCP actually listened to the likes of you and Spkr on AV vs V), they were mostly used to farm infantry. If that 1 AV can stand up to the tank then any vehicle which is not a tank will be removed from the battlefield in double quick time. You are comparing a 4k HP vehicle to a at best 500hp infantry unless it was a heavy but at least AV weapons do not have RBS like the blasters do. They did make more infantry weapons do damage to vehicles over time that at the beginning. Why were vehicles used to farm infantry? random battles and no matchmaking, did you see it in PC? no, unless the enemy team were bad on the vehicle front and you either hammered em hard enough so you could farm the infantry, lolpubs has no intrest to me espc when MM does not exist, i could farm with an AR in lolpubs. CCP Rattati - "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have got to be kidding...''
TIGER SHARK1501 Savage Bullet RUST415 782	Posted - 2016.02.05 13:00:00 - [20] - Quote Thumb Green wrote: And afterwards Spkr will still be bitching about how op a single merc with militia swarms is. Are all the guys from from dead star like this?

The Modern Creature Incorruptibles 83	Posted - 2016.02.05 14:08:00 - [21] - Quote ITT: Salt. DEPLOYING COVER!!! -Me
AldnoahZero Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 10	Posted - 2016.02.05 19:27:00 - [22] - Quote Atiim wrote: Shut up already. The game's literally over; find something else to complain about for once. Somebody's mad.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page