Yes I know it would make some things load quicker, but I was hoping for a more focused answer. Not a vague statement. As far as paragraphing goes; I am using my phone and didn't feel like the extra hassle tbh. I get what your saying and I will take that into consideration for future posts.

Im a techie myself, been that way since I was very young that's how I understand the jargon and what not. I fully agree that an update should be delayed when upgrading hardware or software for many reasons. The hardware mainly correlates to Eve which is the sad part, that's why I want to know exactly how it will apply to Dust not just vague speculation. The test videos of new hardware shown through vmware were amazing, but thats displaying things through computers capable of using the full potential of things.

Splitting support between the systems just holds the game back. Most of the games that look pretty and run smoothly are single player games, and if multiplayer, lack the THOUSANDS of processes going on every second between calculating everyones skill points in game and applying them to each piece of equipment that's being used and calculating resistances and bonus damages in real time.

I'm far from a techy but many who ARE consistently point to this as the primary reason DUST looks like it was made on a potato. The PS3 is a dieing system that's losing support from the company that created it.

It's time to upgrade or get used to playing outdated games.

Yup I agree with you on that. If the numbers (specs) of new hardware apply to Dust like they can or should then we should see more than some loading improvements. I cant remember if it was the first or 2nd TQ3 post I read but one explained how it would apply to overall connection, latency, and speed. In theory if not in actuality it should allow for faster loading, reduced lag, more fps, better graphics, more depth (if they chose to take that route) and less qqing on the forums since there should be less problems.

Maybe we'll even see more rapid updates and hotfixes since they can now apply them without interrupting our actual gameplay.

Well my good sir I wasn't implying that you were being vague or that anyone was. I was just stating I want more of a concrete answer than broad speculation regardless of who is attempting to answer my questions. Unless your a dev or part of development your post serves no purpose for me since it is all speculation of the remaining playerbase until someone who actually knows things opens their mouth. However, thanks for taking offense to my post. It means I'm still doing my job right. Maybe next time you'll actually analyze the entire thread before acting like a childish immature idiot.

Lol again you fail to read everything before posting. Like I said, the game could have supported 1080p or been more in depth already, but it wasn't. Now there is more potential to do so. As far as graphics and FPS is concerned it is mainly client side, but the game itself is played from mostly RAM of the system and the connection to the game server. So yes upgrading the modem that previously supported 4 million connections that now supports 24 million and as stated in the TQ3 dev posts improves connection. If this game was ran off a disc entirely then it would be a client specific issue, but since its the connection to a server frames will be lost with the latency and connection times. If you dont understand that I suggest you go read about basic networking.

Trolling and dramatic bs aside I hope someone whos knowledgeable can help bring some light to this topic.