|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Soto Gallente
448
|
Posted - 2016.01.26 20:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
Pierced Daddy wrote:CrotchGrab 360 wrote:oh hey guys I just realised something which I never knew before! Most DUST players run starter fits!
Yes I know! I didn't know it either............ No...most new guys run starter fits. Keep stroking yourself. Makes me hawt. Lol wut? I've been playing since 2013 and I still run starter fits every single pub match. In fact I went 30/10 with an Armor AV MN Starter fit yesterday with 3000 wp and the previous match I went 18/5 with a Caldari Recon suit.
Starter fits are not bad.
Oh, and both matches I played? 1st place
Ex-news reporter for The Scope
|
Soto Gallente
450
|
Posted - 2016.01.26 20:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Pierced Daddy wrote:Soto Gallente wrote:Pierced Daddy wrote:CrotchGrab 360 wrote:oh hey guys I just realised something which I never knew before! Most DUST players run starter fits!
Yes I know! I didn't know it either............ No...most new guys run starter fits. Keep stroking yourself. Makes me hawt. Lol wut? I've been playing since 2013 and I still run starter fits every single pub match. In fact I went 30/10 with an Armor AV MN Starter fit yesterday with 3000 wp and the previous match I went 18/5 with a Caldari Recon suit. Starter fits are not bad. Oh, and both matches I played? 1st place Since 2013? So you know the maps. And have passives? And know what targets to pick. Knowledge is op Yes, knowledge is OP. But your point is that starter fits are run by new players, where I have pointed out this is not the case. By saying that they are mostly only run by new players, you imply that they are bad, and I have disproven that theory.
Ex-news reporter for The Scope
|
Soto Gallente
455
|
Posted - 2016.01.26 22:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Pierced Daddy wrote:Soto Gallente wrote:Pierced Daddy wrote:Soto Gallente wrote:Pierced Daddy wrote:
No...most new guys run starter fits. Keep stroking yourself. Makes me hawt.
Lol wut? I've been playing since 2013 and I still run starter fits every single pub match. In fact I went 30/10 with an Armor AV MN Starter fit yesterday with 3000 wp and the previous match I went 18/5 with a Caldari Recon suit. Starter fits are not bad. Oh, and both matches I played? 1st place Since 2013? So you know the maps. And have passives? And know what targets to pick. Knowledge is op Yes, knowledge is OP. But your point is that starter fits are run by new players, where I have pointed out this is not the case. By saying that they are mostly only run by new players, you imply that they are bad, and I have disproven that theory. I knucklehead does not disprove anything. Let alone that knucklehead is you Yes, you are a kuncklehead
Ex-news reporter for The Scope
|
Soto Gallente
456
|
Posted - 2016.01.27 01:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:Lightning35 Delta514 wrote:
Basic light damage mod does 4% damage, Same as krins, only difference is that it has a sack penalty, which the krins doesn't have. At the end, you can do more damage with 2 krins than with 2 basic light mods.
What is your source for that claim? that for some reason the stacking penalty wouldn't work? fitting screen? GM Archduke confirmed that the Krin's damage mod does not have stacking penalty.
Also, I believe that the Basic Light Damage Modifier only does 3% extra damage.
So, basically, 2 Complex Light Damage Modifiers and 1 Krin's LEX-71 Damage Modifier does more damage than 3 Complex Light Damage Modifier.
Ex-news reporter for The Scope
|
Soto Gallente
457
|
Posted - 2016.01.27 05:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Milita Mable wrote:If you want proof that Krin DMG mods have no sacking penalties just check their in game info vs regular damage mods.
Regular mods clearly state that they have a stacking penalty while Krin DMG has no such statement.
Back on topic:
I'm the best Milita Suit User.
Like hell you are. 1v1 me in my unmodified Recon Caldari shoot brah.
jk, I respect all militia suit users.
Ex-news reporter for The Scope
|
Soto Gallente
504
|
Posted - 2016.01.27 23:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
The post got deleted.
Ex-news reporter for The Scope
|
Soto Gallente
505
|
Posted - 2016.01.27 23:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:Soto Gallente wrote: The post got deleted.
I know for a fact that it existed. I even replied to his post.
Ex-news reporter for The Scope
|
Soto Gallente
507
|
Posted - 2016.01.27 23:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote:Soto Gallente wrote:KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:Soto Gallente wrote: The post got deleted.
I know for a fact that it existed. I even replied to his post. Well...if no one digs it up, I'll try to do a test tomorrow if FW ever gets up while I'm on dust. The thing is, people have already done numerous tests, and I know they are on the forums. Try searching for posts around last july to november.
Ex-news reporter for The Scope
|
Soto Gallente
543
|
Posted - 2016.01.29 00:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote:Thaddeus Reynolds wrote:Soto Gallente wrote:KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:Soto Gallente wrote: The post got deleted.
I know for a fact that it existed. I even replied to his post. Well...if no one digs it up, I'll try to do a test tomorrow if FW ever gets up while I'm on dust. An update on attempted Testing: Inconclusive...We couldn't test with a weapon that had significant enough damage to show any difference in the final damage (as far as what is displayed is concerned)...either that or the damage does the same...will need to go into a PC to test at some point, since I think we could only see this in action with heavy weapons (or sniper rifles) I suggest testing high alpha weapons.
Ex-news reporter for The Scope
|
|
|
|