My problem with them is CQC. When they jump over my head and I can't track them cause they travel faster than my vertical sensitivity allows me track(sensitivity is at 100). They're essentially kiting me in the air... Very frustrating. Or maybe I'm just a noob. IDK.

You... still don't get it do you?

....

Your entire platform is based on, by your own admission, anecdotal evidence instead of sound argument or compelling evidence. Where is your sound reasoning that brought you to the conclusion that higher sensitivity would fix everything? Is there any evidence that is closely relevant to Dust that would show this? You've yet to even make a proper case for yourself, let alone a compelling one. Instead you continue to chant 'I've got the answer' when you've said nothing that would suggest such.

You are trying to maintain a position where you change something that has little to no effect on the issue at hand, making your platform nearly nonexistant. I cannot argue against something pertaining to the issue at hand properly when it makes no sense to begin with. Well... not more than to say 'you're wrong, go peddle your uselessness elsewhere'. For example, let's say you increased the sensitivity of the controls 500%. You would still likely have well over 95% of the playerbase who never took it beyond 200% of what it is now and likely more than 85% of them couldn't handle sensitivity beyond what it is now. A large percentage of players cannot handle the current speeds at 100%, let alone with it up however much it would take to properly track someone flying over their heads in a firefight

BUT. Let's say we did do what you suggest and increase the sensitivity to 200%. And let's say, for the sake of argument, that 50% of the playerbase were able to aim pinpoint accurate at these speeds and were capable of doing what you say they would be able to do. Best possible case scenario that'll never happen, but let's just say that 50% of everyone suddenly got gungame and better mastery of the Ds3 and were capable of it. This would only fix the issue for 50% of the playerbase. A half fix is not a fix, it is a cop out claiming to be a fix. Balance is not achieved when something is still broken for half of the playerbase.

However, since this wouldn't even be CLOSE to a half fix it's not even worth being considered a fix at all let alone a solution. This game's mechanics are not based around jump mods. Whether or not higher turn speeds would be good for the game overall is hard to say, but from the anti-twitch shooter attitude contained in the majority of posts about it I've read, I'd say the consenus would probably be 'no'.

Now I have stated what you call an A-R-G-U-M-E-N-T, which is required so you to have something to attack when debating someone, feel free to give up your cringeworthy attempts at getting under my skin. They are painfully pathetic to watch and the only thing it's doing is make me embarrassed for you.

So far you've pushed your ideas with annecdotal evidence and you've pushed the envelope for how bad one person can be at name calling. (Which is, if you didn't know, called a *personal attack* and encompassed under the definition of an ad hominem attack when two people are on opposite sides of a debate) You might want to read up on logical fallacies, they can be facinating. The purpose of an ad hominem is typically to distract from an argument's failure to contain any sound reasoning or compelling evidence. Hmm, seems like someone I've spoke to recently had an argument with only annecdotal evidence who was calling names and making derisive comments.... now who could that be....